Advertisement

Statistical analysis of NRCS curve number (NRCS-CN) in arid basins based on historical data

  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

CN method is a commonly used technique for estimation of direct runoff for flood mitigation studies. In Saudi Arabian (SA) arid basins, there is no analysis of NRCS-CN obtained from measured rainfall-runoff events. The research objectives are to find out the actual range of CN values in arid basins, the statistical distribution of CN, the confidence intervals of CNs, and the relation between the CN and initial abstraction factor, λ. Five basins with 19 sub-basins located in the southwest of Saudi Arabia were considered, and 161 rainfall-runoff events were analyzed during the period 1984–1987. The least squares method was used to obtain the optimum range of values for λ and CN based on three estimation methods. The rainfall and runoff exhibited log-normal distribution. The analysis showed that CN varied between 45 and 85 at λ = 0.2. The low CN values account for the transmission losses which is a typical phenomenon in arid regions. The initial abstraction ratio λ = 0.01 is found to be more representative to arid basins rather than λ = 0.2. The Beta distribution is the best to fit CN at both λ = 0.2 and 0.01. The confidence intervals are estimated and tabulated at different significant levels for flood risk assessment studies in arid basins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Change history

  • 10 January 2020

    The original version of this paper was published with error. Some symbols in equations of Figure 3 went missing. Given in this article is the correct figure.

References

  1. Alagha, M. O., and Gutub, S. A., and Elfeki, A. M. (2016). Estimations of NRCS Curve Number from Watershed Morphometric Parameters: A Case Study of Yiba Watershed in Saudi Arabia‏. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 7( 2), pp. 247–265.

  2. Baltas EA, Dervos NA, Mimikou MA (2007) Technical note: determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(6):1825–1829

  3. Banasik, and Madeyski, and Wiezik, and Woodward. (1994). Applicability of Curve Number technique for runoff estimation from small Carpathian watersheds. Development in Hydrology of Mountainous Areas (Eds. L. Molnar, P. Miklanek & I. Meszaros), Slovak Committee for Hydrology and Institute of Hydrology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Stara Lesna, Slovakia, 125-126.

  4. Banasik, and Krajewski, and Sikorska, and Hejduk. (2014). Curve Number estimation for a small urban catchment from recorded rainfall-runoff events. Archives of Environmental Protection, 40(3), 75-86.

  5. Bonta JV (1997) Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. J Irrig Drain Eng 123(1):28–36

  6. Bosznay M (1989) Generalization of SCS curve number method. J Irrig Drain Eng 115(1):139–144

  7. Cazier, D. J., and Hawkins, R. H. (1984). Regional application of the curve number method. Paper presented at the water today and tomorrow: (pp. 710-710). ASCE

  8. Chen, C. (1982). An evaluation of the mathematics and physical significance of the soil conservation service curve number procedure for estimating runoff volume. Paper presented at the Proc., Int. Symp. On rainfall-runoff modeling, water resources Publ., Littleton, Colo., 387-418

  9. Hamed, K., and Rao, A. R. (1999). Flood frequency analysis: CRC press

  10. Hawkins (1973) Improved prediction of storm runoff in mountain watersheds. J Irrig Drain Div 99(4):519–523

  11. Hawkins (1993) Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. J Irrig Drain Eng 119(2):334–345

  12. Hawkins, and Hjelmfelt Jr, A. T., and Zevenbergen, A. W. (1985). Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 111(4), 330-340.

  13. Hawkins, and Woodward, and Jiang. (2001). Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio. Paper presented at the USDA-NRCS Hydraulic Engineering Workshop, Tucson, Arizona.

  14. Hawkins, and Jiang, R., and Woodward, D. (2002). Application of Curve Number Method in Watershed Hydrology. Paper presented at the Presentation at American Water Resources Association Annual Meeting, Albuquerque NM.

  15. Hawkins, and Ward, T. J., and Woodward, D. E., and Van Mullem, J. A. (2008). Curve number hydrology: State of the practice.

  16. Hjelmfelt (1980) Empirical investigation of curve number technique. J Hydraul Div 106(9):1471–1476

  17. Hjelmfelt (1991) Investigation of curve number procedure. J Hydraul Eng 117(6):725–737

  18. Jiang, R. (2001). Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio. (MS thesis, watershed management), University of Arizona, 120 pp.

  19. Kite, G. W. (1977). Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology. Water Resour Publ, 224

  20. Laio, F., and Di Baldassarre, G., and Montanari, A. (2009). Model selection techniques for the frequency analysis of hydrological extremes. Water Resources Research, 45(7). 

  21. McCuen. (1982). A guide to hydrologic analysis using SCS methods: prentice-hall, Inc.

  22. McCuen (2002) Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. Hydrol Eng Amer Soc Civ Eng 7(1):43–48

  23. Mishra SK, Singh VP (2002) SCS-CN method. Part 1: derivation of SCS-CN-based models. Acta Geophysica Polonica 50(3):457–477

  24. Mishra S, Singh VP (2004) Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall-excess rates. Hydrol Process 18(17):3323–3345

  25. Mishra SK, and Singh, V. (2013). Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology (Vol. 42): Springer Science & Business Media

  26. Pilgrim D, Cordery I (1993) Flood runoff. Chapter 9. In: Maidment D (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-hill, Inc, New York

  27. Ponce H (1996) Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng 1(1):11–19

  28. Rallison, R. E. (1980). Origin and evolution of the SCS runoff equation. Paper presented at the symposium on watershed management 1980

  29. Rallison RE, Cronshey RG (1979) Discussion of runoff curve numbers with varying site moisture by Richard H. Hawkins J Irrig Drain Div 105(4):439–439

  30. Rallison, R. E., and Miller, N. (1982). Past, present, and future SCS runoff procedure. Paper presented at the rainfall-runoff relationship/proceedings, international symposium on rainfall-runoff modeling held May 18–21, 1981 at Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA/edited by VP Singh

  31. Ramasastri, K., and Seth, S. (1985). Rainfall-runoff relationships. Rep. RN-20, National Institute of hydrology, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh

  32. Rawls, W. J., and Maidment, D. R. (1993). Infiltration and soil water movement: McGraw-hill

  33. Saudi Arabian Dames and Moore. (1988). Representative basins study for Wadi: Yiba, Habwnah, Tabalah, Liyyah and Al-Lith (Main report) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Water Resource Development Department. Retrieved from

  34. Schneider LE, McCuen RH (2005) Statistical guidelines for curve number generation. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(3):282–290

  35. Soulis K, Dercas N (2007) Development of a GIS-based spatially distributed continuous hydrological model and its first application. Water Int 32(1):177–192

  36. Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2012) SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds-the two-CN system approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(3)

  37. Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2013) Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds. Water Resour Manag 27(6):1737–1749

  38. USDA-NRCS (2004) National Engineering Handbook: section 4: hydrology, soil conservation service. USDA, Washington

  39. USDA-SCS (1963) National Engineering Handbook Section 4: hydrology, soil conservation service. USDA, Washington

  40. USDA-SCS (1972) National Engineering Handbook: section 4: hydrology, soil conservation service. USDA, Washington

  41. USDA-SCS (1985) National Engineering Handbook Section 4: hydrology, soil conservation service. USDA, Washington

  42. Woodward, D. E., and Hawkins, R. H., and Jiang, R., and Hjelmfelt, J., Allen T, and Van Mullem, J. A., and Quan, Q. D. (2003). Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. Paper presented at the World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003.

  43. Yuan, Y., and Nie, W., and McCutcheon, S. C., and Taguas, E. V. (2014). Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in Southeastern Arizona. Hydrological Processes, 28(3), 774-783.

  44. Zevenbergen, A. W. (1985). Runoff curve numbers for rangeland from Landsat data. Technical rep. HL85-1, United States Dept. of agriculture-Agricultural Research Service hydrology laboratory, Beltsville, 72

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Mohammed M. Farran.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The original version of this paper was published with error. Some symbols in equations of Figure 3 went missing. Given in this article is the correct figure.

Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farran, M.M., Elfeki, A.M. Statistical analysis of NRCS curve number (NRCS-CN) in arid basins based on historical data. Arab J Geosci 13, 31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4993-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • NRCS-CN method
  • Curve number
  • Least square method
  • Arid regions
  • Initial abstraction
  • Flood studies