Advertisement

Investigation of yield, yield components and nutrient contents of wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC.)

  • Ramazan Acar
  • Nur KoçEmail author
  • Ade Sumiahadi
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC.), a member of the Brassicaceae family, is vital in natural areas and soil protections as well as in human and animal nutrition. The study was conducted to determine the appropriate row spacing of Turkey’s native plant wild rocket in Konya conditions. This study was conducted in 2015; observations and measurements were carried out in the second (i.e., 2016) and third (i.e., 2017) years. In this study, fodder yield and its components consisted of plant height, canopy diameter, number of branches, fresh and dry fodder yield per plant, and dry fodder yield per hectare and seed yield and its components consisted of number of pods per branch, number of pods per plant, 1000 grains weight, seed yield per plant, and seed yield per hectare were examined. Macro and micronutrient contents of the plant were also analyzed in 2016. The results show that seed yield values such as seed yield (i.e., 76.2 kg ha−1) and 1000 grains weight (i.e., 1.00 g) were higher in 2016. However, in 2017, while seed yield was lower, plant height (i.e., 92.78 cm), canopy diameter (i.e., 85.67 cm), and fodder yield (i.e., 20339.5 kg ha−1) were higher. In nutrient contents (especially Ca, K, and Fe), 20- and 30-cm row spacings were determined as significant. Furthermore, the yield values related to dry fodder and seed yields are higher with 20- and 30-cm row spacings. This study indicated that 20- and 30-cm row spacings are recommended row spacing for wild rocket culture.

Keywords

Fodder yield Forage crop Rangeland Seed yield Wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia

References

  1. Acar R, Coşkun B, Özcan MM, Özcan C, Özköse A, Koç N (2015) The importance and agricutural usage of wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC). In: Proceeding of International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Enviroment (2nd ICSAE), September 30 - October 3. Konya, Turkey, pp 829–833Google Scholar
  2. Acar R, Geçgel Ü, Hamurcu M, Coşkun B, Koç N, Özcan MM (2016) Some chemical properties, fatty acid composition and mineral contents of Diplotaxis tenuifolia seed and oil. Am. J. Essent. Oil. Nat. Prod. 4:23–26Google Scholar
  3. Bianco VV (1995) Rocket, an ancient underutilized vegetable crop and its potential. In: Padulosi S (Ed) Rocket Genetic Resources Network, Report of the First Meeting. November 13-15, 1994, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 35-37.Google Scholar
  4. Bozokalfa MK, Yagmur B, Ilbi H, Esiyok D, Kavak S (2009) Genetic variability for the mineral concentration of Eruca sativa L. and Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. accessions. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 9:372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruso G, Parrella G, Giorgini M, Nicoletti R (2018) Crop systems, quality and protection of Diplotaxis tenuifolia. Agriculture 8(55):1–19Google Scholar
  6. de Feo V, Senatore F (1993) Medicinal plants and phytotherapy in the Amalfitan Coast, Salerno Province, Campania, Southern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 39:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durazzo A, Azzini E, Lazzè MC, Raguzzini A, Pizzala R, Maiani G (2013) Italian wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC.): influence of agricultural practices on antioxidant molecules and on cytotoxicity and antiproliferative effects. Agriculture 3:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erik S (2012) Çok yönlü ruderal bir tur: Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L) DC. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi 4:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO (1990) Micronutrient assessment at the country level: an international study. FAO Soil Bulletin, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  10. Follet RH (1969) Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu in Colorado soils. Colorado State University, Colorado, USA, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabner B, Ribaric-Lasnik C, Romih N, Pfeifhofer HW, Batic F (2011) Bioaccumulation capacity for Pb, Cd and Zn from polluted soil in selected species of the Brassicaceae family growing in different vegetation types. Phyton-Annales Rei Botanicae 50:287–300Google Scholar
  12. Hall M, Jobling J, Rogers G (2012) Some perspectives on the rocket as a vegetable crop: a review. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin 76:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hurka H, Bleeker W, Neuffer B (2003) Evolutionary processes associated with biological invasions in the Brassicaceae. Biol Invasions 5:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenigsbuch D, Ovadia A, Shahar-Ivanova Y, Chalupowicz D, Maurer D (2014) “Rock-Ad”, a new wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) mutant with late flowering and delayed postharvest senescence. Sci Hortic 174:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1969) Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil test. Soil Sci Am Proc 35:600–602Google Scholar
  16. Nicoletti R, Raimo F, Miccio G (2007) Diplotaxis tenuifolia: biology, production and properties. Eur J Plant Sci Biotech 1:36–43Google Scholar
  17. Özcan C (2015) Diplotaxis tenuifolia (yabani roka) bitkisinin ruminant beslemede kullanılabilirliğinin araştırılması. Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  18. Pimpini F, Enzo M (1996) Present status and prospects for rocket cultivation in the Veneto region. A Mediterranean Crop for the World Report of A Workshop, Rocket, pp 13–14Google Scholar
  19. Pimpini F, Giannini M, Lazzarin R (2005) Ortaggi: da foglia da taglio. Veneto Agricoltura, Padua, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. Tomas-Barberan F, Allende A, Truchado P, Bortolotti L, Sabatini A, Simuth J, Bilikova K (2009) Phytochemicals as markers of the floral origin of honey. 41st Congress of Apimondia, September 15-20, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  21. Török P, Miglécz T, Valkó O, Tóth K, Kelemen A, Albert ÁJ, Matus G, Molnár VA, Ruprecht E, Papp L, Deák B, Horwart O, Takács A, Hüse B, Tóthmérész B (2013) New thousand-seed weight records of the Pannonian flora and their application in analysing social behaviour types. Acta Bot Hungar 55(3-4):429–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tripodi P, Francese G, Mennella G (2017) Rocket salad: crop description, bioactive compounds and breeding perspectives. Adv Hortic Sci 31:107–113Google Scholar
  23. USDA (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42. United States Department of Agriculture, Nebraska, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Wolf B (1971) The determination of boron in soil extracts, plant materials, composts, manures, water and nutrient solutions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 2(5):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yaniv Z (1995) Preliminary report on major activities initiated within the framework of network activities. In: Padulosi S (ed) Rocket Genetic Resources Network, Report of the First Meeting, November 13-15, 1994. Lisbon, Portugal, p 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Field Crops, Faculty of AgricultureSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Agrotechnology, Agricultural FacultyUniversitas Muhammadiyah JakartaJakarta SelatanIndonesia

Personalised recommendations