Advertisement

Method and application of rapid detection of local outburst prevention effect of coal uncovering in crosscut and shaft

  • Yujia ChenEmail author
  • Xiaowei Li
  • Jun Tang
  • Dingding Yang
  • Chenglin Jiang
Technical Note
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Before uncovering an outburst coal seam in crosscut and shaft, it is necessary to detect the effect of outburst prevention measure applied to the seam, which is a key step and the last link for ensuring the safety of coal miners. However, in the working face where outburst prevention measures have been taken, the large number of densely arranged discharge boreholes, as well as the difficulty in sealing pressure-measuring boreholes, makes it extremely hard to accurately detect the effect of the measure. In order to solve this problem, this paper studied the relationship between the initial rate of gas emission from the borehole (IRGEB) and the outburst danger through carrying out experiments on a self-designed oblong simulation device of outburst coal seam and a detection device of IRGEB. In addition, it proposed a method of testing the prevention effect using the initial volume of gas emission from the borehole (IVGEB) per unit length which actually refers to the time integral of IRGEB per meter. The experimental results show that IVGEB grows with the increase of outburst danger, but its critical value varies with the types of coal seams and gasses. As a result, it may take over 20 days to get the critical value of outburst detection of a specific coal seam. For this reason, this paper presented a simplified method of determining the critical value of IVGEB per unit length. When this method is applied, the total time taken up can be enormously reduced to shorter than 4 h just by drilling another borehole for measuring the IVGEB. The field application results indicate that the method can quickly detect whether outburst danger has been locally eliminated. Hence, it can be regarded as a very applicable method for the rapid detection of outburst prevention effect before coal uncovering in crosscut and shaft.

Keywords

Detection of outburst prevention effect Initial volume of gas emission from the borehole Critical value Gas pressure Initial release of gas expansion energy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their careful review of this paper.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41802188), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150180), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References

  1. Beamish BB, Crosdale PJ (1998) Instantaneous outbursts in underground coal mines: an overview and association with coal type. Int J Coal Geol 35:27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Y (2010) Study on the methods of outburst danger on crosscut exposing coal prediction. China University of Mining and Technology, XuzhouGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen S, Jiang C (2002) Study on gas flow measurement system of initial desorption gas. J China Univ Min Technol 04:80–84Google Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Li X, Tang J, Yang D, Jiang C (2017) A rapid prediction technology for the outburst risk of coal uncovered in crosscuts and shafts and its application in the Panyi Coal Mine in Huainan, China. Min Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14749009.2017.1384437
  5. Deng Q, Luan Y, Wang Y (1989) Coal and gas outburst simulation test. Safety in Coal Mines 11:5–10Google Scholar
  6. Fernandez-Diaz JJ, Gonzalez-Nicieza C, Alvarez-Fernandez MI et al (2013) Analysis of gas-dynamic phenomenon in underground coal mines in the central basin of Asturias (Spain). Eng Fail Anal 34:464–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisne A, Esen O (2014) Coal and gas outburst hazard in Zonguldak Coal Basin of Turkey, and association with geological parameters. Nat Hazards 74:1363–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Han Y, Jiang C (2005) Relationship between expansion energy of initial released gas and gas pressure. J Chin Univ Mining Technol 34(05):650–654Google Scholar
  9. Jiang C (2000) Linear discriminant analysis and critical value of outburst risk. J Chin Univ Min Technol 29(01):63–66Google Scholar
  10. Jiang C, Yu Q (1998) The spherical shell instability mechanism and prevention technology of coal and gas outburst. China University of Mining and Technology Press, XuzhouGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang C, Xu L, Li X et al (2015) Identification model and indicator of outburst-prone coal seams. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(1):409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lama R, Bodziony J (1998) Management of outburst in underground coal mines. Int J Coal Geol 35:83–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li G, Abouna S (2014) Comparing potentials for gas outburst in a Chinese anthracite and an Australian bituminous coal mine. Int J Min Sci Technol 24(1):23e29Google Scholar
  14. Li X, Jiang C, Tang J et al. (2017) A Fisher’s criterion-based linear discriminant analysis for predicting the critical values of coal and gas outbursts using the initial gas flow in a borehole. Mathematical Problems in EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  15. State Administration of Coal Mine Safety (2009) State Regulation of Coal and Gas Outburst Prevention and Control of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  16. Su W (1996) Probing into prediction of gas and coal outburst with dynamic index of gas emission. Coal Eng 05:2–7Google Scholar
  17. Tang J, Jiang C, Chen Y et al (2016) Line prediction technology for forecasting coal and gas outbursts during coal roadway tunneling. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 34:412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tian S, Jiang C, Xu L et al (2016) A study of the principles and methods of quick validation of the outburst-prevention effect in the process of coal uncovering. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 30:276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wei F, Shi G, Zhang T (2010) Study on coal and gas outburst prediction indexes base on gas expansion energy. J China Coal Soc S1:95–99Google Scholar
  20. Wu X (2014) Research the impact of predictive of drilling vibration and the height of coal in the funnel to continuous flow method prominent prediction means. China University of Mining and Technology, XuzhouGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu L, Jiang C (2017) Initial desorption characterization of methane and carbon dioxide in coal and its influence on coal and gas outburst risk. Fuel 203:700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xue S et al (2014) Advances in gas content based on outburst control technology in Huainan, China. Int J Min Sci Technol 24(3):385e389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang D, Chen Y, Tang J, Li X, Jiang C, Wang C, Zhang C (2018) Experimental research into the relationship between initial gas release and coal-gas outbursts. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 50:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhou A et al (2015) Numerical simulation for propagation characteristics of shock wave and gas flow induced by outburst intensity. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(1):107e112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zou Q et al (2014) Variation of methane adsorption property of coal after the treatment of hydraulic slotting and methane pre-drainage: a case study. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 20:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zou Q et al (2015) Novel integrated techniques of drilling-slotting-separation-sealing for enhanced coal bed methane recovery in underground coal mines. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 26:960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yujia Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Xiaowei Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jun Tang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dingding Yang
    • 4
  • Chenglin Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Gas and Fire Control for Coal MinesXuzhouChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Research Center of Coal Gas ControlXuzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Safety EngineeringChina University of Mining & TechnologyXuzhouChina
  4. 4.School of Petrochemical and Energy EngineeringZhejiang Ocean UniversityZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations