Advertisement

Source rock potential and reservoir characterization of the Lower Cretaceous Sarmord Formation in selected sections in Kurdistan Region-Iraq

  • Ayad N. F. EdilbiEmail author
  • Khalat F. Mohammed
  • Zhila H. Sadeq
  • Ammar A. Aldalawy
  • Bahroz G. A. Zebari
  • Mohammad Pirouei
  • Ramyar Suramairy
  • Jagar A. Ali
Original Paper
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The Sarmord Formation is underlain by the most important source rocks and overlain by several major reservoirs in the Kurdistan Region. Two sections including a subsurface (well from Kirkuk oilfield) and a surface (outcrop at Bekhme Gorge) of the Sarmord Formation were studied to identify and describe the role of the Sarmord Formation within petroleum systems in the region. Thus, organic geochemistry and petrophysical characteristics of the Sarmord Formation have been studied using Rock-Eval, log data, core analysis and thin section studies. Results showed different lithologies between the studied sections of the Sarmord Formation; an intercalating of yellowish-gray marl (calcareous mudstone) and dark brownish to dark-gray shale was observed at outcrop, and subsurface section was mostly composed of clays with a composition of limestone and dolomite. The source rock potential of the shale layers of the Sarmord Formation reveals that the total organic carbon (TOC wt%) of subsurface section is 0.22 wt% on average which is regarded as poor organic carbon content. The average of Tmax value is 426 °C that shows the formation is thermally immature. The capability of formation in generating of hydrocarbons is poor at subsurface section. Whereas the surface (outcrop) samples show fair to good content of organic carbon (0.83 TOC wt% on average), and they are thermally mature (Tmax is 440 °C on average). The hydrocarbon generative potential of outcrop seems to be poor to good. The petrophysical study of the subsurface section displays low porosity and permeability (0.04% and 0.04 mD on average respectively). These values are generally considered as poor reservoir quality. Likewise, measurement values of porosity and permeability from outcrop are 6.425% and 0.108 mD on average, respectively, showing poor reservoir quality. The microscopic study also shows that the matrix material is largely comprised of lime mud and allomicrite types, and its porosity types (particularly of vague and fracture types) indicate the low percentage of porosity (not exceeding 1%). On the other hand, presence of bitumen seeps along fractures at the outcrop section may reveal that the formation can be regarded as a fractured-reservoir.

Keywords

Source rock Reservoir quality Porosity Permeability Sarmord Formation Kurdistan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank NOC for providing subsurface data. We are also deeply grateful to Professor Dr. Kamal Kolo for providing facilities and analyzing our samples in Scientific Research Center (SRC) of Soran University.

References

  1. Abdula R (2010) Petroleum source rock analysis of the Jurassic Sargelu Formation, northern Iraq: M.S. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 106 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed SM (2007) Source rock evaluation of Naokelekan and Barsarin formations (Upper Jurassic), Kurdistan Region, north Iraq: M.Sc. thesis, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq, 197 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Ameri TK, Najaf AA, Al-Khafaji AS, Zumberge J, Pitman J (2014) Hydrocarbon potential of the Sargelu Formation, North Iraq. Arab J Geosci 7(3):987–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0875-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Eisa ME, Al-Omeri F (1996) Facies, depositional environment, and occurrence of Sarmord Formation. Unpuble Report, Alum Al-Rafidain-Univ of Musoul, Dep Of Geology, Iraq, p 15Google Scholar
  5. Aqrawi AAM, Goff JC, Horbury AD, Sadooni FNI (2010) The petroleum geology of Iraq. Scientifc Press Ltd, Beaconsfield, p 424Google Scholar
  6. Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Mech Eng 146:54–62Google Scholar
  7. Asquith G, Krygowski D (2004) Basic well log analysis, 2nd edn, 244 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellen RC, Van DHV, Wetzel R, Morton DM (1959) Lexique stratigraphique international. V. III, Asie, Fasc., 10a Iraq. Paris, 333 pGoogle Scholar
  9. Bordenave ML (1993) Applied petroleum geochemistry. Editions Technip, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Buday T (1980) The regional geology of Iraq. vol. 1, Stratigraphy and paleogeography. Dar Al-Kutub pub., Univ. of Mosul, Iraq, 445 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Choquette PW, Pray LC (1970) Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. AAPG Bull 54:207–250Google Scholar
  12. Crain ER (1986) The log analysis handbook. Penn-Well Publishing Company, Tulsa 700 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Csontos L, Sasvári Á, Pocsai T, Kósa L, Salae AT, Ali A (2012) Structural evolution of the northwestern Zagro, Kurdistan Regions, Iraq: Implications on oil migration. GeoArabia 17(2):81–116Google Scholar
  14. Dembicki H (2017) Petroleum geochemistry for exploration and production. Elsevier, Amsterdam 342 pGoogle Scholar
  15. Edilbi ANF (2010) Stratigraphy and petroleum potential of Chia Gara Formation (Tithonian-Berriasian) in selected sections in north Iraq: M.Sc. thesis. Salahaddin University, Erbil 126 pGoogle Scholar
  16. English JM, Lunn GA, Ferreira L, Yaku G (2015) Geologic evolution of the Iraqi Zagros, and its influence on the distribution of hydrocarbons in the Kurdistan Region. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 99(2):231–272Google Scholar
  17. Gluyas J, Swarbrick R (2004) Petroleum geoscience. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, p 359Google Scholar
  18. Hunt JM (1996) Petroleum geochemistry and geology, 2nd edn. Cambridge, USA, 743 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Ibrahimbas A, and Riediger C (2004) Hydrocarbon Source Rock Potential as determined by Rock-Eval 6/TOC Pyrolysis, Northeast British Columbia and Northwest Alberta. Resource Development and Geoscience Branch, Summary of Activities: British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/natural-gas-oil/petroleum-geoscience/geoscience-reports/2004/ibrahimbas_riediger.pdf
  20. Jassim SZ, Buday T (2006) Tectonic framework. In: Jassim SZ, Goff JC (eds) Regional Geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno, pp 71–183Google Scholar
  21. Jassim SZ, Goff JC (2006) Regional geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno 341 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinghorn RRF (1983) Introduction to the physics and chemistry of petroleum. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Langford FF, Blanc-Valleron MM (1990) Interpreting rock-Eval pyrolysis data using graphs of pyrolyzable hydrocarbons vs. total organic carbon. AAPG Bull 74:799–804Google Scholar
  24. Larionov V (1969) Borehole Geometery. Nedra, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  25. Law CA (1999) Evaluating source rocks; treatise of petroleum geology / Handbook of Petroleum Geology: Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps. AAPG, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  26. Law A, Munn D, Symms A, Wilson D, Hattingh S, Boblecki R, Al Marei K, Chernik P, Parry D, Ho J (2014) Competent person’s report on certain petroleum interests of Gulf Keystone petroleum and its subsidiaries in Kurdistan, Iraq. ERC Equipoise Ltd, CroydonGoogle Scholar
  27. Levorsen AI (1967) Geology of petroleum. C.B.S Publishers and Distribution, Delhi, pp 77–137Google Scholar
  28. Lucia FJ (2007) Carbonate reservoir characterization, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 336 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Mamaseni WJ, Naqshabandi SF, Al-Jaboury FK (2018) Petrophysical properties of the Early Cretaceous Formations in the Shaikhan Oilfeld/Northern Iraq. Earth Sci Res J 22(1):45–52.  https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v22n1.66088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mamaseni WJ, Naqshabandi SF, Al-Jaboury FK (2019) Hydrocarbon generation potential of Chia Gara Formation in three selected wells, Northern Iraq. Open Geosci 11:77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2019-0007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohialdeen IMJ, Hakimi MH, Al-Beyati FM (2013) Geochemical and petrographic characterization of Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Chia Gara Formation in northern Iraq: palaeoenvironment and oil-generation potential. Mar Pet Geol 43:166–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohyaldin IMJ (2008) Source rock appraisal and oil-source correlation for the Chia Gara Formation, Kurdistan, north Iraq: Ph.D. thesis, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq, 140 p.Google Scholar
  33. Mohyaldin IMJ, and Al-Beyati FM (2007) Sedimentology and hydrocarbon generation potential of Middle Tithonian-Berriassian Chia Gara Formation, Well K-109, Kirkuk oilfield, NE Iraq. Journal of Kirkuk University 2:27–43Google Scholar
  34. Nnaemeka E (2010). Petroleum Reservoir Engineering Practice: Porosity of Reservoir Rocks, 816 pGoogle Scholar
  35. North FK (1985) Petroleum geology. Allen & Unwin, Boston 607 pGoogle Scholar
  36. Nunez-Betelu L, Baceta JI (1994) Basic and application on Rock – Eval/TOC pyrolysis, and example from the Upper Paleocene/Lowermost Eocene in the Basque Basin, Western Pyrenees. MUNIBE(Ciencias)Google Scholar
  37. Peters KE (1986) Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 70:318–329Google Scholar
  38. Peters KE, Cassa MR (1994) Applied source rock geochemistry. In : Magoon LB, and Bow WG (1994) The petroleum system- from source to trap. AAPG Mem 60:93–120Google Scholar
  39. Peters KE, Walters CC, Moldowan JM (2005) The Biomarker Guide. Volumes 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1155 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Pitman JK, Steinshour D, Lewan MD (2004) Petroleum generation and migration in the Mesopotamian basin and Zagros Fold Belt of Iraq, result from a basin modeling study. GeoArabia 9(4):41–72Google Scholar
  41. Rabbani AR, Kamali MR (2005) Source rock evaluation and petroleum geochemistry, offshore SW Iran. J Pet Geol 28(4):413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlumberger (1989) Log interpretation principles and application, SMP-7017Google Scholar
  43. Selley RC, Sonnenberg SA (2015) Elements of petroleum geology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Sissakian VK (2013) Geological evolution of the Iraqi Mesopotamia Foredeep, inner platform and near surroundings of the Arabian Plate. J Asian Earth Sci 72:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Society of Petrophysics and Well-Log Analysts, 9th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 9(4)Google Scholar
  46. Timur A (1968) An Investigation of Permeability, Porosity, & Residual Water Saturation Relationships for Sandstone Reservoirs, Society of Petrophysics and Well-Log Analysts, 9th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 9(4)Google Scholar
  47. Tissot BP, Welte DH (1984) Petroleum Formation and occurrence: a new approach to oil and gas exploration, 2nd edn. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, p 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wetzel R (1950) Stratigraphy survey in North Iraq. MPC report, NIMCO Library, No. 139, BaghdadGoogle Scholar
  49. Zebari MM, Burberry CM (2015) 4-D evolution of anticlines and implications for hydrocarbon exploration within the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. GeoArabia 20(1):161–188Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayad N. F. Edilbi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khalat F. Mohammed
    • 1
  • Zhila H. Sadeq
    • 1
  • Ammar A. Aldalawy
    • 2
  • Bahroz G. A. Zebari
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mohammad Pirouei
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ramyar Suramairy
    • 5
  • Jagar A. Ali
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Petroleum Geosciences, Faculty of ScienceSoran UniversitySoranIraq
  2. 2.Department of Petroleum EngineeringCollege of Engineering, Knowledge UniversityErbilIraq
  3. 3.Department of Geology, College of scienceSalahaddin UniversityErbilIraq
  4. 4.Scientific Soran Research CenterSoran UniversitySoranIraq
  5. 5.University of Kurdistan HewlerErbilIraq
  6. 6.Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringSoran UniversitySoranIraq

Personalised recommendations