Advertisement

Integrated effect of nano-Zn, nano-Si, and drainage using crop straw–filled ditches on saline sodic soil properties and rice productivity

  • Ahmed Mohammed Saad KheirEmail author
  • Hesham Mahmoud Abouelsoud
  • Emad Maher Hafez
  • Osama Ali Mohamed Ali
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Soil salinity and sodicity issues due to limited water resources and arid climate are the main sources of land degradation in the North Nile delta. Moreover, burning rice and cotton straw is a very common practice in this region contributing to global warming and further polluting the environment. Improving saline sodic properties by biological drainage has received less attention so far. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of burying some crop residuals in field ditches and foliar application of nanoparticles on salt affected soil properties and rice productivity. The obtained results revealed that burying rice or cotton straw in field ditches prior to rice planting resulted in significant increase in rice yield and its components with superiority of cotton stalk–filled ditches to that filled by rice straw especially in the second season. Likewise, the incorporation of crop residual improved soil properties including soil fertility. The decomposition of rice straw or cotton stalk obviously decreased soil electric conductivity and soil compaction and slightly decreased bulk density. Also, soil hydraulic conductivity and organic matter content were positively responded to incorporation of crop residues. In addition, the availability of N and Zn in soil was increased due to the application of crop residues. The yield and yield components of rice were significantly affected by the foliar application of nano-Si and Zn with superiority of nano-Zn. Also, soil properties such as soil salinity, bulk density, soil compaction, hydraulic conductivity, organic matter, and available nitrogen were slightly affected by these nanoparticles while the available Zn was clearly increased.

Keywords

Nanoparticles Injection Burying Residual-filled ditches Soil fertility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Agricultural Research Center, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI) for technical and financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abd El-Aziz MA (2013) Safely disposal of some field wastes through the injection into salt affected soils at North delta using mole drain to improve soil. J Soil Sci Agric Eng, Mansoura Univ 4:163–174Google Scholar
  2. AbdelRahman MAE, Shalaby A, Aboelsoud HM, Moghanm FS (2018) GIS spatial model based for determining actual land degradation status in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, North Nile Delta. Model Earth Syst Environ 4:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adhikari T, Kundu S, Rao AS (2013) Impact of SiO2 and Mo Nano Particles on Seed Germination of Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Int J Agric Food Sci Technol 4:2249–3050Google Scholar
  4. Asseng S, Kheir AMS, Kassie BT, Hoogenboom G, Abdelaal AIN, Haman DZ, Ruane AC (2018) Can Egypt become self-sufficient in wheat? Environ Res Lett 13:094012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azeem M, Hayat R, Hussain Q, Ahmed M, Pan G, Tahir MI, Imran M, Irfan M, Ul-Hassan M (2019) Biochar improves soil quality and N2-fixation and reduces net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a dryland legume-cereal cropping systems. Soil Tillage Res 186:172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batsmanova LM, Gonchar LM, Taran NY, Okanenko AA, Kyiv (2013) Using a Colloidal Solution of Metal Nanoparticles as Micronutrient Fertiliser for Cereals. Proc Int Conf Nanomater Appl Prop 2:2–3Google Scholar
  7. Black (1983) Methods of soil analysis, Part I and Part II. Amer Argon.Inc. Publ, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  8. Elamawi RM, Bassiouni SM, Elkhoby WM, Zayed BA (2016) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on brown spot disease and rice productivity under saline soil. J Plant Prot Path Mansoura Univ 7:171–181Google Scholar
  9. El-Ashry AS (2008) Improving performance of a ditcher for depositing crop residuals, p 373–388Google Scholar
  10. El-Berry A, Arif M, Baiomy EM, Radwan HA (2001) Evaluation of (hematol) machine in rice straw chopping El-Berry. Misr J Agric Eng 356:421–435.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein E (1999) Emanuel epstein. Annu Rev Plant Biol 50:641–664.  https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.sj.6300107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fores E, Menendez M, Comin FA (1988) Rice straw decomposition in rice-field soil. Plant Soil 109:145–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia G (1978) Soil water engineering laboratory manual. Color. State Univ Dept. Agric. Chem. Eng. State Univ Dept. Agric Chem Eng Fortcollins, Color 80523Google Scholar
  14. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken 6Google Scholar
  15. González-Melendi P, Fernández-Pacheco R, Coronado MJ, Corredor E, Testillano PS, Risueño MC, Marquina C, Ibarra MR, Rubiales D, Pérez-De-Luque A (2008) Nanoparticles as smart treatment-delivery systems in plants: assessment of different techniques of microscopy for their visualization in plant tissues. Ann Bot 101:187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, pp 134–204Google Scholar
  17. Kardoni F, Mosavi SJS, Parande S, Torbaghan ME (2013) Effect of salinity stress and silicon application on yield and component yield offaba bean (Vicia faba). Int J Agric Crop Sci 6:814–818Google Scholar
  18. Khan HR, McDonald GK, Rengel Z (2004) Zinc fertilization and water stress affects plant water relations, stomatal conductance and osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Plant Soil 267:271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0120-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan RU, Gurmani ALIR, Khan MS, Gurmani AH (2009) Residual, direct and cumulative effect of boron application on wheat and rice yield under rice-wheat system. Soil Env 27:219–223Google Scholar
  20. Kheir AMS, El Baroudy A, Aiad MA, Zoghdan MG, Abd El-Aziz MA, Ali MGM, Fullen MA (2019) Impacts of rising temperature, carbon dioxide concentration and sea level on wheat production in North Nile delta. Sci Total Environ 651:3161–3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kishk MA (1986) Land degradation in the Nile Valley. Ambio 15Google Scholar
  22. Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c18 Google Scholar
  23. Korndörfer GH, Lepsch I (2001) Effect of silicon on plant growth and crop yield. Stud Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80011-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemraski MG, Normohamadi G, Madani H, Abad HHS, Mobasser HR (2017) Two Iranian rice cultivars’ response to nitrogen and nano-fertilizer. Open J Ecol 07:591–603.  https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2017.710040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin D, Xing B (2008) Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42:5580–5585.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es800422x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu C, Li F, Luo C, Liu X, Wang S, Liu T, Li X (2009) Foliar application of two silica sols reduced cadmium accumulation in rice grains. J Hazard Mater 161:1466–1472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller DE, Aarstad JS (1971) Furrow infiltration rates as affected by incorporation of straw or furrow cultivation. Soil Water Manag Conserv:492–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohamed N (2016) Land degradation in the Nile Delta. Springer International Publishing, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mousavi SR, Rezaei M (2011) Nanotechnology in food production. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 1:37–57.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527634798.ch3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Needelman B, Kleinman P, Allen A (2007) Improved management of agricultural drainage ditches for water quality protection: an overview. J Soil Water Conserv 62:171–178.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0401412jes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Page A (1982) Methods of {S}oil {A}nalysis. {P}art 2, {C}hemical and {M}icrobiological {P}roperties. Am Soc Agron Soil Sci Soc Am Madison, Wisconsin,USA (9):1982Google Scholar
  33. Piper N (1950) Soil and plant analysis. Inc. Soc., Publ.Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Powter C (2002) Glossary of reclamation and remediation terms used in Alberta 7th edn. ISBN: 0-7785-2156-7
  35. Prasad TNVKV, Sudhakar P, Sreenivasulu Y, Latha P, Munaswamy V, Raja Reddy K, Sreeprasad TS, Sajanlal PR, Pradeep T (2012) Effect of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of peanut. J Plant Nutr 35:905–927.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.663443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rameshraddy GJ, Pavithra GJ, Rajashekar Reddy BH, Salimath M, Geetha KN, Shankar AG (2017) Zinc oxide nano particles increases Zn uptake, translocation in rice with positive effect on growth, yield and moisture stress tolerance. Indian J Plant Physiol 22:287–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-017-0303-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, United States Salinity Lab. Agriculture Handbook  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1954.03615995001800030032x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizwan M, Ali S, Ibrahim M, Farid M, ADrees M, Bharawana SA, Zia-ur-rehman M, Qayyum MF, Abbas F (2015) Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:15416–15431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5305-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seleiman MF, Kheir AMS (2018a) Saline soil properties, quality and productivity of wheat grown with bagasse ash and thiourea in different climatic zones. Chemosphere 193:538–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seleiman MF, Kheir AMS (2018b) Maize productivity, heavy metals uptake and their availability in contaminated clay and sandy alkaline soils as affected by inorganic and organic amendments. Chemosphere 204:514–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Servin A, Elmer W, Mukherjee A, De la Torre-Roche R, Hamdi H, White JC, Bindraban P, Dimkpa C (2015) A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J Nanopart Res 17:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2907-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shalaby A, Ali RR, Gad A (2012) Land Degradation Monitoring in the Nile Delta of Egypt, using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Basic Appl Sci 1:283–294Google Scholar
  43. Shehata SM, Zayed BA, Naeem ES, Seedek SE, Gohary AAE (2009) Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to different levels of zinc and sulfur under saline soil. Egypt J Appl Sci 24Google Scholar
  44. Sims JT (1986) Soil pH effects on the distribution and plant availability of manganese, copper, and zinc. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:367.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000020023x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh S (2012) Achieving second green revolution through nanotechnology in India, pp 545–572Google Scholar
  46. Singh Y, Bijay S, Ladha JK, Khind CS, Gupta RK, Meelu OP, Pasuquin E (2004) Long-term effects of organic inputs on yield and soil fertility in the rice–wheat rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:845–853Google Scholar
  47. Sugano A, Tsuchimoto H, Tun CC, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2005) Succession of methanogenic archaea in rice straw incorporated into a Japanese rice field: Estimation by PCR-DGGE and sequence analyses. Archaea 1:391–397.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/582597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suppan S (2013) Nanomaterials In Soil Inst Agric Trade PolicyGoogle Scholar
  49. Takakai F, Ichikawa J, Ogawa M, Ogaya S, Yasuda K, Kobayashi Y, Sato T, Kaneta Y, Nagahama K (2017) Suppression of CH4 emission by rice straw removal and application of bio-ethanol production residue in a paddy field in Akita, Japan. Agriculture 7:21.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7030021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tirol-Padre A, Tsuchiya K, Inubushi K, Ladha JK (2005) Enhancing soil quality through residue management in a rice-wheat system in Fukuoka, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 51:849–860.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2005.tb00120.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Torabian S, Zahedi M, Khoshgoftarmanesh A (2016) Effect of foliar spray of zinc oxide on some antioxidant enzymes activity of sunflower under salt stress. J Agric Sci Technol 18:1013–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Upadhyaya H, Roy H, Shome S, Tewari S, Bhattacharya M k, Panda SK (2017) Physiological impact of zinc nanoparticle on germination of rice ( Oryza sativa L ) seed. J Plant Sci Phytopathol 1:62–70.  https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang S, Wang F, Gao S (2015) Foliar application with nano-silicon alleviates Cd toxicity in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2837–2845.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3525-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watts-Williams SJ, Turney TW, Patti AF, Cvagnaro TR (2014) Uptake of zinc and phosphorus by plants is affected by zinc fertiliser material and arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Soil 376(1):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soils, Water and Environment Research InstituteAgricultural Research CenterGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureKafrelsheikh UniversityKafr-ElsheikhEgypt
  3. 3.Crop Science Dept., Faculty of AgricultureMenoufia UniversityShebin El-KomEgypt

Personalised recommendations