Advertisement

Assessment and modeling of runoff in ungauged basins based on paleo-flood and GIS techniques (case study of Wadi Al Dawasir-Saudi Arabia)

  • Milad H. MasoudEmail author
  • Jalal Basahi
  • Burhan Niyazi
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Scarcity of measured hydrologic data is the main cause for difficulty in demonstrating the assessment of groundwater recharge. The aim of this study is to provide a new scope to assess the runoff and groundwater recharge in ungauged basins based on paleo-flood and morphometric features in arid environment in spite of limited hydrological data. This study is based on rainfall-runoff modeling through the integration between paleo-flood mark measurement, basin physiographic features, and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. Four models of ArcHydro, Grinne (channel) model, Watershed Modeling System (WMS), and HEC-HMS were integrated together and used to assess flood risk and the relationship between rainfall and runoff in the study basin. Al Dawasir basin was selected to demonstrate this study, because it is the biggest basin in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with an area of 257,689 km2 and extends for about 700 km from Makkah al-Mukarramah region in the west side of Saudi Arabia to Riyadh region and the Rub` Al Khali in the middle of Saudi Arabia. Al Dawasir basin which has stream order reaches to 8th order, composed of 2 sub-basins of 7th order, 12 sub-basins of 6th order, and 44 basins of 5th order. This study deals with the hydrological study of large sub-basins of highest order (7th and 6th) such as Al Fushsh, Turbah, Al Khurmah, Ranyah, Bishah, Shiab Yafikh, Tathlith, Al Hinu, Al Maqran, Himam, and Uyaynah sub-basins. Wadi Al Dawasir Basin is usually subjected to sporadic storm events, which vary spatially and temporally in intensity. Based on the paleo-flood measurement of Wadi Ranyah sub-basin, calibrated scenarios have been done and the resulted hydrograph is matching with rainfall event of 10-year return period with and without routing scenarios. Some scenarios have been done to calculate the surface runoff volume of the whole Wadi Al Dawasir basin and calibrated the results based upon the paleo-flood measurement of Wadi Ranyah sub-basin. The calculated volume of Wadi Al Dawasir basin ranges from 4.8 BCM to 27.4 BCM for 2- and 100-year return periods, respectively.

Keywords

Basin HEC-HMS Hydrograph Modeling Rainfall Runoff Wadi Al Dawasir 

Notes

Funding information

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No. 438/123/237. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.

References

  1. Aigner R (2000) Schlusselkurve version 1.0. In: Martin and Pohl (Hrsg.) Hydraulische und numerische Modelle, Technische Hydromechanik (hydraulic and numerical models, technical hydrodynamics), Bd. 4. Verlag Bauwesen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajabaa S, Masoud M, Ai-Amri N (2014) Flash flood hazard mapping based on quantitative hydrology, geomorphology and GIS techniques (case study ofWadi AI Lith, Saudi Arabia). Arabian J Geosci 7(6):2469e2481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s2517-013-0941-2
  3. Baker VR (1973) Paleohydrology and sedimentology of Lake Missoula flooding in eastern Washington. Special Paper, vol. 144. Geol Soc Am Bull 79.Google Scholar
  4. Baker VR (1975) Flood hazards along the Balcones Escarpment in central Texas: alternative approaches to their recognition, mapping and management. Univ Texas Bureau Econo Geol Circ 75–5:22Google Scholar
  5. Baker VR (1977) Stream channel response to floods with examples from central Texas. Geol Soc Am Bull 88:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker VR (1987) Paleoflood hydrology and extreme flood events. J Hydrol 96:79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker VR (1998) Paleohydrology and the hydrological sciences. In: Benito G, Baker VR, Gregory KJ (eds) Palaeohydrology and environmental change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Baker VR (2008) Paleoflood hydrology: origin, progress, prospects. Geomorphology 101(2008):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop MP, Shroder JF, Bonk R, Olsenholler J (2002) Geomorphic change in high mountains. Awestern Himalayan perspective. Glob Planet Chang 32:311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cetin M (2013) Landscape engineering, protecting soil, and runoff storm water, InTech-Open Science-Open Minds, Online July 1st, 2013. Chapter 27, Book: Advances in Landscape Architecture Environmental Sciences, ISBN 978–953–51-1167-2, 697–722 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Cetin M (2015) Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International. Int J Sust Dev World 22(5):1–5 June 2015 with 880 Reads.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cetin M (2016) Sustainability of urban coastal area management: a case study on Cide. J Sustain For 35(7):527–541.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2016.1228072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cetin M, Onac AK, Sevik H, Ugur C, Huseyin A (2018) Chronicles and geoheritage of the ancient Roman city of Pompeiopolis: a landscape plan. Arab J Geosci 11:798.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4170-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays L (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunge JA (1969) On the subject of a flood propagation computational method (Muskingum method). J Hydraul Res 7(2):2051230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis JC (1975) Statics and data analysis in geology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. El Osta M, Masoud M (2015) Implementation of a hydrologic model and GIS for estimating Wadi runoff in Dernah area, Al Jabal Al Akhadar, NE Libya. J Afr Earth Sci 107:36–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elfeki A, Masoud M, Niyazi B (2017) Integrated rainfall–runoff and flood inundation modeling for flash flood risk assessment under data scarcity in arid regions: Wadi Fatimah basin case study, Saudi Arabia. Nat Hazards 85(1):87–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2559-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity—a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31:328–330Google Scholar
  20. Fuller ML (1917) Discussion of the final report of the special committee on floods and flood prevention. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 81:1269–1278 Paper No. 1400Google Scholar
  21. Garrido MC, Deville Y, Lezaud P (2017) Extreme value analysis: an introduction. J de la Société Française de Statistique 154(2):66–97Google Scholar
  22. Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 456Google Scholar
  23. Haggett P (1965) Locational analysis in human geography. St. Martin’s Press-Arnold, London, p 339Google Scholar
  24. Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins, hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaya E, Agca M, Adiguzel F, Cetin M (2018) Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Human Ecol Risk Asses: An International Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leadbetter MR (1974) On extreme values in stationary sequences. Z Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw Gebiete 28:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majure JJ, Soenksen PJ (1991) Using geographic information system to determine physical basin characteristics for use in flood-frequency equations. In: Balthrop BH, Terry JE (eds) U.S. geological survey national computer technology meeting-proceedings, Phoenix, Arizona, p 14–18, 1998: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report, 90–4162:31–40Google Scholar
  29. Malik A, Kumar A, Kandpal H (2019) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds in a hilly watershed using weighted sum approach. Arab J Geosci 12:118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4310-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning R (1891) On the flow of water in open channels and pipes. Trans Inst Civil Eng Irel 20:161–207Google Scholar
  31. Martin H, Pohl RU (2000) Technische Hydromechanik, Hydraulische und numerische Modelle (Technical hydromechanics, hydraulic and numeric models), Band 4Google Scholar
  32. Masoud M (2015) Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged Wadis in arid environments (case study Wadi Rabigh—Saudi Arabia). Arab J Geosci 8:2587.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1404-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masoud M (2016) Geoinformatics application for assessing the morphometric characteristics’ effect on hydrological response at watershed (case study of Wadi Qanunah, Saudi Arabia). Arab J Geosci 9:280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2300-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masoud MH, EL Osta M (2016) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in El-Bahariya Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt, using modelling and GIS techniques: a case study. J Earth Syst Sci 125(6):1139–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0725-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Masoud M, Schumann S, Mogheeth SA (2013) Estimation of groundwater recharge in arid, data scarce regions; an approach as applied in the El Hawashyia basin and Ghazala sub-basin (Gulf of Suez, Egypt). Environ Earth Sci 69:103–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1938-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melton MN (1957) An analysis of the relations among elements of climate surfacepropertiesandgeomorphology. ProjectNR389-042TechRept.II, Columbiana. Dept. of geology, on Geog., R., branch, New York, 34Google Scholar
  37. Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Project NR, Technical Report 3, Columbia Univ., Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York, pp. 389–042Google Scholar
  38. Mueller JE (1968) An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity Indexes1. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 58(2):371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NRCS (1972) Hydrology guide for use in watershed planning. SCS national engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology, supplement a. US Department of Agriculture, soil conservation service, engineering division, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. NRCS (1985) National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller JR (2002) Process geomorphology. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  42. Romshoo SA, Bhat SA, Rashid IJ (2012) Geoinformatics for assessing the morphometric control on hydrological response at watershed scale in the Upper Indus Basin. Earth Syst Sci 121: 659.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0192-8, , 686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarangi A, Bhattacharya AK, Singh A, Singh AK (2001) Use of geographic information system (GIS) in assessing the erosion status of watersheds. Indian J Soil Conserv 29:190–195Google Scholar
  44. Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage system and slope in badlands of Perth Amboy. New Jersey 67:597–546Google Scholar
  45. Şen Z, Khiyami AH, Al-Harthy SG, Al-Ammawi FA, Al-Balkhi AB, Al-Zahrani MI, Al-Hawsawy HM (2012) Flash flood inundation map preparation for wadis in arid regions. Arab J Geosci 6:3563–3572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0614-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh O, Sarangi A, Sharma C (2008) Hypsometric integral estimation methods and its relevance on erosion status of north-western lesser Himalayan watersheds. Water Resour Manag 22:1545–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9242-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stewart JE, Bodhaine GL (1961) Floods in the Skagit River basin, Washington. Water Supply Paper, vol. 1527. US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  48. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography. Bull Geol Soc Am Bull 63:1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strahler AN (1953) Revision of Hortons’ quantitative factors in erosional terrain. Trans Am Geophys Union 34:356Google Scholar
  50. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Handbook of Applied Hydrology, New York, McGraw Hill Book Company, 411Google Scholar
  52. Strickler A (1923) mitteilungen des Eidgenossischen Amtes fur Wasserwirtschaft 16, Bern, Switzerland Translated as “Contributions to the question of a velocity formula and roughness data for streams, channels and closed pipelines.” by T. Roesgan and W. R. Brownie, Translation T-10, W. M. Keck Lab of Hydraulics and Water Resources, Calif. Inst. Tech., Pasadena, Calif. January 1981Google Scholar
  53. Viessman W, Knapp JW, Lewis GL, Harbauqh TE (1977) Introduction to hydrology. Happer and Row Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Wanielista MP, Kersten R, Eaglin R (1995) Hydrology water quantity and quality control, Wiley and Sons, 2nd EditionGoogle Scholar
  55. Wheater HS, Laurentis P, Hamilton GS (1989) Design rainfall characteristics for South-West Saudi Arabia. Proc Inst Civ Eng 87(4):517–538Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milad H. Masoud
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jalal Basahi
    • 2
  • Burhan Niyazi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Research CenterKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land AgricultureKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations