Advertisement

Layer regrouping optimization for multilayer heterogeneous reservoirs at a high water cut stage

  • Wu Zhongwei
  • Cui ChuanzhiEmail author
  • Japan Trivedi
  • Li Rongtao
  • Tang Wenhao
  • Wei Zijian
  • Gao Min
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the vertical heterogeneity of the multilayer reservoirs, which results in a great interlayer interference, the recovery of each layer is significantly different when all layers are perforated and produced simultaneously. The layer with poor reservoir properties has a smaller recovery than that with good reservoir properties. Layer regrouping is an effective method to reduce interlayer interference and improve the recovery of the layer with poor reservoir properties. However, not all layer regrouping programs are reasonable when considering the relationship of investment and income. We must find the optimal layer regrouping program. In this paper, we generate all possible layer regrouping programs by using the enumeration method with the second kind Stirling numbers. The optimal layer regrouping program is obtained with considering the effect of technique and economic factors. Based on the theory of Buckley-Leveret displacement, the cumulative oil production of each program is obtained. The more oil produced, the more favorable the program is. The feasibility of layer regrouping program is seriously depended on economic benefits, which can be calculated by net present value method. The feasibility of layer regrouping program under different drilling well number and crude oil price is analyzed. Finally, a case for layer regrouping optimization is introduced. From the case, we can conclude that when oil price is $70 per barrel and drilling well number is 2, the 237th program is the optimal layer regrouping program, whose net present value is 422.44 × 104 Chinese yuan.

Keywords

Multilayer heterogeneous reservoirs Layer regrouping Optimization Enumeration method High water cut stage 

Notes

Funding information

The work is supported by the China National Science and Technology Major Projects (Grant No: 2016ZX05011-002-003 and 2016ZX05010-002-007), China University of Petroleum Graduate Innovation Engineering Project (Grant No: YCX2018013), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No: 18CX06011A).

References

  1. Bao JW, Song XM, Ye JG et al (2010) Recombination of layer series of development in high water-cut oil field. Xinjiang Pet Geol 31(3):291–294Google Scholar
  2. Buckley SE, Leverett MC (1942) Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Trans Aime 14(46):107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen RQ (2006) Optimization study on the development plan of subdivision injection in the complicated fault block reservoir. Fault-Block Oil Gas Field 13(1):29–30Google Scholar
  4. Chen MQ, Ge JL (1987) Analytic method of reservoir series division with fuzzy classification in field development. J Southwest Pet Inst 9(2):25–32Google Scholar
  5. Chen MF, Jiang HQ, Zeng YX (2007) A study on max/min permeability ratio boundary for reasonable developed-layer recombination in extremely heterogeneous reservoirs. China Offshore Oil Gas 19(5):319–322Google Scholar
  6. Cui C, Wu Z (2018) Layer recombination technique for waterflooded low-permeability reservoirs at high water cut stage. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 5:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Cui CZ, Zhao XY (2010) Method for calculating production indices of multilayer water drive reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 75(1):66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui CZ, Xu JP, Wang DP, Liu ZH, Huang YS, Geng ZL (2016) Layer regrouping for water-flooded com-mingled reservoirs at a high water-cut stage. Pet Sci 13(2):272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cvetkov B (2013) On the theoretical foundation of the principle of least squares. Surv Rev 16(119):36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobsona AJ (1968) A note on stirling numbers of the second kind. J Combin Theory 5(2):212–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du QL, Zhu LH (2004) A new approach to study layered producing performance of oil and water wells. Pet Explor Dev 31(5):96–98Google Scholar
  12. Jahangiri HR, Zhang D (2011) Optimization of the net present value of carbon dioxide sequestration and en-hanced oil recovery. Offshore Technol Conf.  https://doi.org/10.4043/21985-MS
  13. Jia XF, Su YC, Deng JF et al (2016) Interlayer dynamic interference caused by commingled production and its influencing factors on sandstone reservoir. Fault-Block Oil Gas Field 23(3):334–337Google Scholar
  14. Jiang HQ, Yao J, Jiang RZ (2006) Principles and method of reservoir engineering. China University of Petroleum Press, DongyingGoogle Scholar
  15. Li J, Tu B, Chen F (2010) Studies on quantifying and optimizing techniques for development series subdivision. Pet Geol Oilfield Dev Daqing 29(6):87–91Google Scholar
  16. Li Q, Zhang J, Deng B, Chang J, Li H, Liu S, Xu X (2011) Grey decision-making theory in the optimization of strata series recombination programs of high water-cut oilfields. Pet Explor Dev 38(4):463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo SL, Zeng LF, Li LX et al (2010) Application of K-means methods in the subdivision of layers of the complex fault block reservoirs. J Southwest Pet Univ 32(6):98–102Google Scholar
  18. Peng DT, Shin KG (1993) Optimal scheduling of cooperative tasks in a distributed system using an enumerative method. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 19(3):253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rennie BC, Dobson AJ (1969) On stirling numbers of the second kind. J Comput Theor Nanosci 7(2):116–121Google Scholar
  20. Shi C, Du Q, Zhu L, et al (2006) Research on Remaining Oil Distribution and Further Development Methods for Different Kinds of Oil Layers in Daqing Oilfield at High Water-cut Stage[C]// SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  21. Stiles WE (1949) Use of permeability distribution in water flood calculations. J Pet Technol 1(1):9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang SB, Niu SW (2004) Layer subdivision in the late high water cut stage in the complex fault block reservoirs, Dongxin Oilfield. Pet Explor Dev 31(3):116–118Google Scholar
  23. Welge HJ (1952) A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive. J Pet Technol 4(4):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wooddy LD, Capshaw TD (1960) Investment evaluation by present-value profile. Soc Pet Eng.  https://doi.org/10.2118/1339-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woods RW, Muskat M (1945) An analysis of materialba-lance calculations. Soc Pet Eng.  https://doi.org/10.2118/945124-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu JW, Wang JC, Liu J (2006) Optimization method for layered water injection project based on the distribution of remaining oil. J Daqing Pet Inst 30(4):12–15Google Scholar
  27. Xian B, Xiong Y, Shi GX et al (2007) Interlayer interference analysis of commingled production in thin reservoirs and its technical countermeasures. Spec Oil Gas Reserv 14(3):51–54Google Scholar
  28. Yu HL, Wang WG, Rong N et al (2006) Rule of interlayer interference in various water cut periods of Shengtuo Oilfield. Pet Geol Recov Effic 13(4):71–73Google Scholar
  29. Yu HJ, Zhu GJ, Tan XH et al (2014) Study on interlayer interference caused by commingling production and development strategy in sandstone reservoir. J Southwest Pet Univ 36(1):101–106Google Scholar
  30. Zhang K, Lu R, Zhang L et al (2014) Threshold pressure and interlayer interference for multi-layer commingled production oil reservoirs. Pet Geol Oilfield Dev Daqing 33(6):57–64Google Scholar
  31. Zhao X (1997) An application of enumerative method in production planning. Appl Stat Manag (sl):16–18.Google Scholar
  32. Zhu MJ (2014) Sweep efficiency coefficient of injection well pattern based on equivalent flow resistances method. Bull Sci Technol 30(2):197–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wu Zhongwei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cui Chuanzhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Japan Trivedi
    • 2
  • Li Rongtao
    • 1
  • Tang Wenhao
    • 3
  • Wei Zijian
    • 1
  • Gao Min
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of Petroleum (East China)QingdaoChina
  2. 2.School of Mining and Petroleum, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Hebei Scoilmic Petroleum Technology Co., LtdChanzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations