Advertisement

A sparse solution for accurate seismic refraction arrival time selection

  • Alireza GoudarziEmail author
  • Shadi Veisi
  • Mina Omidvar
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Picking the seismic arrival time is an important parameter for the refraction studies. However, random noise, mainly generated by unknown sources, leads to the data quality reduction and incorrect arrival definition. Besides, picking the accurate first arrival time requires expert interpreters. Poor quality of seismic refraction data related to the high noise amount (because of human being-related noise and low energy source) leads to the reduce accuracy of automatic picking methods. For the improvement of the first arrival time selection, different operators are used. One of the operators used for arrival time picking is the derivation operator. Indeed, the calculation of the non-smooth first orders of derivation increases the standard deviation. Thus, to apply the derivative, sufficient smoothing is used to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we enhance the accuracy of first break picking by polynomial approximation and total variation (PATV) method. This method in three steps (smoothing, filtering, and denoising) prepares the signal for derivative operator implementation to pick the first break. We have determined the first arrival time with more accuracy.

Keywords

The first arrival PATV method P phase picker Derivative operator 

References

  1. Baer M, Kradolfer U (1987) An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(4):1437–1445Google Scholar
  2. Boschetti F, Dentith MD, List RD (1996) A fractal-based algorithm for detecting first arrivals on seismic traces. Geophysics 61(4):1095–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coppens F (1985) First arrivals picking on common-offset trace collections for automatic estimation of static correction. Geophys Prospect 33:1212–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1985.tb01360.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelchinsky BT, Shtivelman V (1983) Automatic picking of first arrivals and parameterization of travel time curve. Geophys Prospect 31:915–928.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01097.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goudarzi AR, Riahi MA (2012) Seismic coherent and random noise attenuation using the undecimated discrete wavelet transform method with WDGA technique. IOP Science, pp 619–631.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/10/6/065007, 10
  6. Hatherly PJ (1982) A computer method for determining seismic first arrival time. Geophysics 47(10):1431–1436.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalkan E (2016) An automatic P-phase arrival-time picker. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(3):971–986.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liao Q, Kouri D, Nanda D, Castagna J (2011) Automatic first break detection by spectral decomposition using minimum uncertainty wavelets. Society of Exploration Geophysics 81st Annual Meeting (San Antonio), pp1627–1631.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3627515
  9. Mausa WA, Al-Shuhail AA, Al-Lehyani A (2011) A new technique for first-arrival picking of refracted seismic data based on digital image segmentation. Geophysics 76:79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0322.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murat ME, Rudman AJ (1992) Automated first arrival picking: a neural network approach. Geophys Prospect 40:587–604.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00543.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nijim YW, Stearns SD, Mikhael WB (1996) Lossless compression of seismic signals using differentiation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 34(1):52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1109/36.481892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peraldi R, Clement A (1972) Digital processing of refraction data: study of first arrivals. Geophys Prospect 20:529–548.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00653.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sabbione JI, Velis D (2010) Automatic first-breaks picking: new strategies and algorithms. Geophysics 75(4):v67–v76.  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Selesnick IW (2013) Simultaneous polynomial approximation and total variation denoising. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp 5944–5948.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638805
  15. Selesnick IW, Arnold S, Dantham VR (2012) Polynomial smoothing of time series with additive step discontinuities. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60:6305–6318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Şenkaya M, Karsli H (2014) A semi-automatic approach to identify first arrival time: the cross-correlation technique (CCT). Earth Sci Res J 18(2):107–113.  https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v18n2.35887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Souza WE, Manenti RR, Porsani MJ (2016) Automatic first-breaks picking using linear moveout correction and complex seismic traces. Revista Brasileira de Geofisica, vol 34, no. 3.  https://doi.org/10.1190/sbgf2017-300
  18. Spagnolini U (1991) Adaptive picking of refracted first arrivals. Geophys Prospect 39:293–312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00314.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tibuleac IM, Herrin ET, Britton JM, Shumway R, Rosca AC (2003) Automatic determination of secondary seismic phase arrival times using wavelet transforms. 25th seismic research review—nuclear explosion monitoring: building the Knowledge Base, session 3–04, pp 352–359.  https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.6.884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate University of Advanced TechnologyKermanIran

Personalised recommendations