Resource- and content-aware, scalable stitching framework for remote sensing images

  • Süleyman EkenEmail author
  • Ümit Mert
  • Selahattin Koşunalp
  • Ahmet Sayar
Original Paper


This paper proposes a new approach to solving the scalability problem in stitching and registration of satellite images. The image stitching process is mostly utilized to capture an image of an entire object, whose parts fall in separate but overlapping mosaics. Due to their high resolutions and huge sizes, the stitching of satellite mosaic images is time- and resource-consuming process. The work presented in this paper proposes a resource- and content-aware, scalable stitching technique. The main idea is based on measuring and assessing the available hardware resources of the machine, on which stitching process runs, and scaling the resolution of the images accordingly. Moreover, preprocessing is not needed, and the adjustment is performed dynamically at run time. The effectiveness of the proposed technique was assessed by partially registering overlapping satellite mosaic images of the island of Cyprus and Lake Van. The scalability tests are performed on varying numbers and sizes of the overlapping LandSat-8 satellite images.


Image registration Image stitching Object extraction LandSat-8 Polygon Resolution scaling 


  1. Babbar G, Bajaj P, Chawla A, Gogna M (2010) A comparative study of image matching algorithms. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management 2(2):337–339Google Scholar
  2. Brown LG (1992) A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Comput Surv 24(4):325–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coppin P et al (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens 25(9):1565–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daniels K, Inkulu R (2001) Translational polygon covering using intersection graphs. 13th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, pp. 61–64, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, August 13–15Google Scholar
  5. David PR et al (2010) Web-enabled landsat data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sens Environ 114:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawn S, Saxena V, Sharma B (2010) Remote sensing image registration techniques: a survey. Image and Signal Processing 6134:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin SE, Wulder MA (2002) Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas. Prog Phys Geogr 26(2):173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gasster CA et al (2011) Recent developments in high performance computing for remote sensing: a review. IEEE J-STARS 4(3):508–527Google Scholar
  9. Jan K et al (2009) Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. Int J Remote Sens 113(5):957–964Google Scholar
  10. Lajiao C et al (2015) A review of parallel computing for large-scale remote sensing image mosaicking. Clust Comput 18(2):517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthew CH, Thomas RL (2012) A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ 122:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olasz A, Nguyen Thai B, Kristóf D, (2016) A new initiative for tiling, stitching and processing geospatial big data in distributed computing environments. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume III-4, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, pp. 111–118, 12–19 JulyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliveira FPM, Tavares JMRS (2014) Medical image registration: a review. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 17(2):73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parker JR (2010) Algorithms for image processing and computer vision. 2 Edition ed. WileyGoogle Scholar
  17. Suri S (2010) Automatic Image to Image Registration for Multimodal Remote Sensing Images. PhD Thesis, Institut für Photogrammetrie und Kartographie, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  18. Zitova B, Flusser J (2003) Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 21(11):977–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Süleyman Eken
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ümit Mert
    • 2
  • Selahattin Koşunalp
    • 3
  • Ahmet Sayar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringKocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey
  2. 2.Information Technologies Institute, TUBITAKGebzeTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Electricity and EnergyUniversity of BayburtBayburtTurkey

Personalised recommendations