Advertisement

Geotechnical performance of sandy bricks made with fine aggregates of sand dunes, Saudi Arabia

  • El-Sayed Sedek Abu SeifEmail author
  • Abdullah Rashed Sonbul
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

The utilization of eolian sands as construction fine aggregates in bricks and mortar production has been achieved on dune sands collected from Jeddah-Al-Lith area (Saudi Arabia). These dune sands had been mixed with well-graded crushed fine aggregates at a variety mixing ratio fluctuated between 10 and 100% of the total volume of sand at constant ratio 1:2:3 (cement/water/sand). By comparing the physical characteristics (grain size, specific gravity, texture) mineral composition, workability and compressive strength features of the study materials, it is found that similarity with the most of the dune sands characteristics which reported in pervious literatures. The obtained results show that except for the gradational and textural features, these materials are fitting as construction fine aggregates when the mixing ratio not exceed than 50% of the total quantity of sands. Up to 50%, the compressive strength will be abruptly decreased owing to internal failure as a result of bleeding and segregation of raw mixtures before consolidation processes that due to increasing of surface area of well-rounded and high sphericity of dune grains.

Keywords

Sand dunes Sandy bricks Workability and strength South Jeddah Saudi Arabia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Professor Abdullah M. Al-Amri (Editor-in-Chief) and Professor Nabil Khélifi (Journal Managing Editor, Springer) and the two reviewers (Professor Ali Mesaed and Dr. Bader Hakami) for their insightful comments and criticism that improved the original manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. G-2-145-1438. The authors, therefore, acknowledge and thank the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) for the technical and financial support they kindly provided.

References

  1. Abu Seif ES (2013a) Assessing the engineering properties of concrete made with fine dune sands: an experimental study. Arab J Geosci 6:857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu Seif ES (2013b) Performance of cement mortar made with fine aggregates of dune sand, Kharga oasis, Western Desert, Egypt: an experimental study. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering 7(3):270–284Google Scholar
  3. Abu Seif ES, Sonbul AR, Hakami BAH, El-Sawy EK (2016) Experimental study on the utilization of dune sands as a construction material in the area between Jeddah and Mecca, Western Saudi Arabia. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1007–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn N (2000) An experimental study on the guidelines for using higher contents of aggregate microfines in Portland cement concrete. Ph. D., University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Harthy AS, Abdel Halim M, Taha R, Al-Jabri KS (2007) The properties of concrete made with fine dune sand. Constr Build Mater 21:1803–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Sanad HA, Ismael NF, Nayfeh AJ (1993) Geotechnical properties of dune sands in Kuwait. Eng Geol 34:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashour MM (1985) Textural properties of Qatar dune sands. J Arid Environ 8:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM C128 (1993) Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM C 128. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM specification, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM C33 (1999) Standard specification for concrete aggregates. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM specification, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  10. ASTM C469 (1994) Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM specification, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  11. ASTM D2419-95 (1998) Standard test method for sand equivalent value of soils and fine aggregate. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 1103–1187Google Scholar
  12. Basaham AS, Gheith AM, Khawfany AAA, Sharma R, Hashimi NH (2014) Sedimentary variations of geomorphic subenvironments at Al-Lith area, central-west coast of Saudi Arabia, Red Sea. Arab J Geosci 7:951–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basista M, Weglewski W (2008) Micromechanical modelling of sulphate corrosion in concrete: influence of ettringite forming reaction. Theoret Appl Mech 35(1–3):29–52 BelgradeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell FG (1978) Foundation engineering in difficult ground. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Bell FG (2007) Engineering geology, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier, 581pGoogle Scholar
  16. Biczok I (1972) Concrete Corrosion Concrete Protection. Akademiai Kiado, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  17. Bigas JP, Gallias JL (2002) Effect of fine mineral additions on granular packing of cement mixtures. Mag Concr Res 54(3):155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cramer SM, Parry HJ (1995) Effect of optimized total aggregate grading on Portland cement concrete for Wisconsin pavements. Transportation research record, no. 1478, National Research Council, pp 100–106Google Scholar
  19. De Larrard F, Hu C, Sedran T, Szitkar JC, Joly M, Claux F, Derkx F (1997) A new rheometer for soft-to-fluid fresh concrete. ACI Mater J 94(3):234–243Google Scholar
  20. Dumitru I, Zdrilic T, Crabb R (1999) Methylene blue adsorption value (MBV). Is it a rapid test method for the assessment of rock quality? Proceedings, 43rd annual conference of the Institute of Quarrying, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. Durgaprasada Rao NVN, Behairy AKA (1984) Mineralogical variations in the unconsolidated sediments of El-qasr reef, north of Jeddah, west coast of Saudi Arabia. J Cont Shelf Res 3:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durgaprasada Rao NVN, Behairy AKA (1986) Nature and composition of shore zone sediments between Jeddah and Yanbu, eastern Red Sea. Mar Geol 70:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folk RL (1968) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill’s, Drawer M. University Station, AustinGoogle Scholar
  24. Folk RL (1978) Angularity and silica coatings of Simpson Desert and grains, Northern Territory. J Sediment Petrol 52:93–101Google Scholar
  25. Galloway JE Jr (1994) Grading, shape and surface properties. ASTM special technical publication no. 169C, Philadelphia, pp 401–410Google Scholar
  26. Garzanti E, Andò S, Vezzoli G, Lustrino M, Boni M, Vermeesch P (2012) Petrology of the Namib sand sea: long-distance transport and compositional variability in the wind-displaced Orange Delta. Earth Sci Rev 112:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garzanti E, Vermeesch P, Andò S, Vezzoli G, Valagussa M, Allen K, Kadi KA, Al-Juboury AIA (2013) Provenance and recycling of Arabian desert sand. Earth Sci Rev 120:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillott JE (1980) Properties of aggregates affecting concrete in North America. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 13(4):289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glavind M, Olsen GS, Munch-Petersen C (1993) Packing calculations and concrete mix design. Nordic Concrete Research, Publication No 13Google Scholar
  30. Golterman P, Johansen V, Palbfl L (1997) Packing of aggregates: an alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix. ACI Mater J 94(5):435Google Scholar
  31. Hudson B (1999) Modification to the fine aggregate angularity test, proceedings, seventh annual International Center for Aggregates Research Symposium, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansen V, Andersen PJ (1989) Particle packing and concrete properties, Material Science of Concrete II (eds) Skalny J, Mindess S, pp 111–148Google Scholar
  33. Johansson L (1979) The Effect of Aggregate Grading and Mix Proportions on the Workability for concrete made with entirely crushed aggregate. Studies on concrete technology. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, pp 147–160Google Scholar
  34. Khalaf FI, Gharib IM (1985) Roundness parameters of quartz sand grains of recent Aeolian sand deposits in Kuwait. Sediment Geol 45:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khan IH (1982) Soil studies for highway construction in arid zones. Eng Geol 19:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kosmatka S (1994) Bleeding. ASTM special technical publication no. 169C, Philadelphia, pp 89–111Google Scholar
  37. Langer WH (1993) Natural aggregates of the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey bulletin no. 1594, 2nd printingGoogle Scholar
  38. Lopez-Querol S, Arias-Trujillo J, Elipe MGM, Sanchez AM, Cantero B (2017) Improvement of the bearing capacity of confined and unconfined cement stabilized aeolian sand. Constr Build Mater 153:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo FJ, Heb L, Pan Z, Duan WH, Zhao XL, Collins F (2013) Effect of very fine particles on workability and strength of concrete made with dune sand. Constr Build Mater 47:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Multon S, Sellier A, Cyr M (2009) Chemo–mechanical modeling for prediction of alkali silica reaction (ASR) expansion. Cem Concr Res 39:490–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neville AM (1995) Properties of concrete. Longman Group Limites, Harlow, p 844Google Scholar
  42. Padmakumar GP, Srinivas K, Uday KV, Iyer KR, Pathak P, Keshava SM, Singh DN (2012) Characterization of aeolian sands from Indian desert. Eng Geol 139–140:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pallister JS (1986) Geologic map of Al-Lith Quadrangle, sheet 20D, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jeddah: Saudi Arabian Directorate General of Mineral Resources. Geologic map GM-95, scale1:250,000Google Scholar
  44. Powers MC (1953) A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 23:117–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Powers TC (1968) Properties of Fresh Concrete. Wiley, Hoboken 654 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Rocco CG, Elices M (2009) Effect of aggregate shape on the mechanical properties of a simple concrete. Eng Fract Mech 76:286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabatini FH (1984) O processo construtivo de edifícios de alvenaria estrutural sílicocalcário. Thesis of Master of Science, University of São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  48. Shilstone JM (1990) Concrete mixture optimization. Concrete international: design and. Construction 12(6):33–39Google Scholar
  49. Shilstone JM (1999) The aggregate: the most important value-adding component in concrete. proceedings 7th Annual International Center for Aggregates Research Symposium, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  50. Skalny J, Marchand J, Odler I (2002) Sulphate attack on concrete. Spon Press, London 230pGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith RC (1979) Materials and construction, 3rd edn. Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc., New York, p 94Google Scholar
  52. Swenson EG, Gillott JE (1964) Alkali–carbonate rock reaction. Highw Res Rec 45:21–40Google Scholar
  53. Thomas DSG (1987) The roundness of aeolian quartz sand grains. Sediment Geol 52:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Washa GW (1998) In: Dobrowolski J (ed) Permeability and absorption, Chapter 8, Concrete Construction Handbook, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilby CB (1991) Concrete materials and structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Yool AIG, Lees TP, Fried A (1998) Improvements to the methylene blue dye test for harmful clay in aggregates for concrete and mortar. Cem Concr Res 28(10):1417–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • El-Sayed Sedek Abu Seif
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Abdullah Rashed Sonbul
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Earth SciencesKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceSohag UniversitySohagEgypt

Personalised recommendations