The potential of biotechnology for mitigation of greenhouse gasses effects: solutions, challenges, and future perspectives

  • Nasser Delangiz
  • Mohammad Behrouzi Varjovi
  • Behnam Asgari Lajayer
  • Mansour GhorbanpourEmail author
Review Paper


Global warming is a serious threat to humans and other creatures’ existence. In recent years, it has led to devastating consequences among which storms, as witnessed in all over the world, can be pointed out. It has also caused sea and ocean levels rise, the soil grows dry, and the quantity and quality of agricultural crops decrease. Moreover, the extinction of species is the other side of the problem. Political conflicts caused by the migration of people from poor and crisis-hit countries to rich countries can be mentioned as one of the other consequences. Human activities, such as vast consumptions of fossil fuels, which release gases including carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) into the atmosphere, preserve the temperature in the atmosphere as the main causes of global warming. However, some natural phenomena can alter climatic conditions around the world. Couple of studies has proven that the role of human is more destructive than natural ones. The Paris World Summit on global warming and climate change has underscored the importance of country’s combat against this phenomenon. Biotechnology, as a leading science, provides novel solutions for this crisis and plays an inevitable role in reducing greenhouse gases. Genetic engineering methods such as genome editing, or gene transfer could suitably overcome the severe environmental conditions by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis and overall biomass. Optimizing biofuel production and providing environmentally friendly fuels that are easily feasible via biotechnology are the possible methods that reduce greenhouse gases and ultimately control the global warming. Here, in this review, we discuss the possible ways that biotechnology can help to ameliorate the global warming effect.


Biofuels Extinction Global warming Greenhouse gases Biotechnology 


  1. Adesemoye AO, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1–12Google Scholar
  2. Almeida JR, Fávaro LC, Quirino BF (2012) Biodiesel biorefinery: opportunities and challenges for microbial production of fuels and chemicals from glycerol waste. Biotechnol Biofuels 5(48):1–16Google Scholar
  3. von Alvensleben N, Demedts B, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W (2016) Salinity tolerance of four freshwater microalgal species and the effects of salinity and nutrient limitation on biochemical profiles. J Appl Phycol 28:861–876Google Scholar
  4. Anthony KW, von Deimling TS, Nitze I, Frolking S, Emond A, Daanen R et al (2018) 21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes. Nat Commun 9:3262Google Scholar
  5. Babu V, Murthy M (2017) Butanol and pentanol: the promising biofuels for CI engines—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:1068–1088Google Scholar
  6. Bado S, Forster BP, Nielen S, Ghanim A, Lagoda PJ, Till BJ, Laimer M (2015) Plant mutation breeding: current progress and future assessment. Plant Breeding Rev 39:23–88Google Scholar
  7. Banerjee A, Banerjee C, Negi S, Chang JS, Shukla P (2017) Improvements in algal lipid production: a systems biology and gene editing approach. Crit Rev Biotechnol 38(3):369–385Google Scholar
  8. Basarab JA, Beauchemin KA, Baron VS, Ominski KH, Guan L, Miller SP, Crowley J (2013) Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production. Animal 7:303–315Google Scholar
  9. Benemann J (2013) Microalgae for biofuels and animal feeds. Energies 6:5869–5886Google Scholar
  10. Bindoff NL, Stott PA, AchutaRao KM, Allen MR, Gillett N, Gutzler D, Hansingo K, Hegerl G, Hu Y, Jain S, Okhov II, Overland J, Perlwitz J, Sebbari R, Zhang X (2013) Detection and attribution of climate change: from global to regional. In: Stocker T (ed) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 867–952Google Scholar
  11. Bita CE, Gerats T (2013) Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front Plant Sci 4:1–17Google Scholar
  12. Broothaerts W, Mitchell HJ, Weir B, Kaines S, Smith LM, Yang W, Mayer JE, Roa-Rodriguez C, Jefferson RA (2005) Gene transfer to plants by diverse species of bacteria. Nature 433:629–633Google Scholar
  13. Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos Trans R Soc B 368:20130122Google Scholar
  14. Carroll A, Mansoori N, Li S, Lei L, Vernhettes S, Visser RG, Somerville C, Gu Y, Trindade LM (2012) Complexes with mixed primary and secondary cellulose synthases are functional in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 160:726–737Google Scholar
  15. Cerri MR, Wang Q, Stolz P, Folgmann J, Frances L, Katzer K, Li X, Heckmann AB, Wang TL, Downie JA (2017) The ERN1 transcription factor gene is a target of the CCaMK/CYCLOPS complex and controls rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus. New Phytol 215:323–337Google Scholar
  16. Charoensuk K, Sakurada T, Tokiyama A, Murata M, Kosaka T, Thanonkeo P, Yamada M (2017) Thermotolerant genes essential for survival at a critical high temperature in thermotolerant ethanologenic Zymomonas mobilis TISTR 548. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(204):1–11Google Scholar
  17. Colombo B, Favini F, Scaglia B, Sciarria TP, D’Imporzano G, Pognani M, Alekseeva A, Eisele G, Cosentino C, Adani F (2017) Enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by using mixed microbial culture. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(201):1–15Google Scholar
  18. Cui Z, Zhang F, Chen X, Miao Y, Li J, Shi L, Xu J, Ye Y, Liu C, Yang Z (2008) On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil N min test. Field Crop Res 105:48–55Google Scholar
  19. Datta A, Ullah H, Ferdous Z (2017) Water management in rice. In: Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp 255–277Google Scholar
  20. Derelle E, Ferraz C, Rombauts S, Rouzé P, Worden AZ, Robbens S, Partensky F, Degroeve S, Echeynié S, Cooke R (2006) Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:11647–11652Google Scholar
  21. Dugan AJ, Birdsey R, Mascorro VS, Magnan M, Smyth CE, Olguin M, Kurz WA (2018) A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector. Carbon Balance Manag 13:13Google Scholar
  22. Edwards D, Batley J (2016) Plant genomics and climate change. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. El-Araby R, Amin A, El Morsi A, El-Ibiari N, El-Diwani G (2017) Study on the characteristics of palm oil–biodiesel–diesel fuel blend. Egypt J Pet 27(2):187–194Google Scholar
  24. Ferrante A, Nocito FF, Morgutti S, Sacchi GA (2017) Plant breeding for improving nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency. In: Tei F, Nicola S, Benincasa P (eds) Advances in research on fertilization management of vegetable crops. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 221–246Google Scholar
  25. Fischer CR, Klein-Marcuschamer D, Stephanopoulos G (2008) Selection and optimization of microbial hosts for biofuels production. Metab Eng 10:295–304Google Scholar
  26. Fu Y, Guo Q, Wu X, He C, Sang X, Xie T (2018) A modified model of surface temperature inversion based on Landsat 8 remote-sensing data and measured data. Int J Remote Sens 39:6170–6181Google Scholar
  27. Good AG, Beatty PH (2011) Fertilizing nature: a tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biol 9:100–112Google Scholar
  28. Gouveia L, Graça S, Sousa C, Ambrosano L, Ribeiro B, Botrel EP, Neto PC, Ferreira AF, Silva CM (2016) Microalgae biomass production using wastewater: treatment and costs: scale-up considerations. Algal Res 16:167–176Google Scholar
  29. Groenewald JH, Botha FC (2008) Down-regulation of pyrophosphate: fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP) activity in sugarcane enhances sucrose accumulation in immature internodes. Transgenic Res 17:85–92Google Scholar
  30. Hashimoto T, Horikawa DD, Saito Y, Kuwahara H, Kozuka-Hata H, Shin T, Minakuchi Y, Ohishi K, Motoyama A, Aizu T (2016) Extremotolerant tardigrade genome and improved radiotolerance of human cultured cells by tardigrade-unique protein. Nat Commun 7:12808Google Scholar
  31. Hay WW (1996) Tectonics and climate. Geol Rundsch 85:409–437Google Scholar
  32. Hood EE, Love R, Lane J, Bray J, Clough R, Pappu K, Drees C, Hood KR, Yoon S, Ahmad A (2007) Subcellular targeting is a key condition for high-level accumulation of cellulase protein in transgenic maize seed. Plant Biotechnol J 5:709–719Google Scholar
  33. Höök M, Tang X (2013) Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—a review. Energ Policy 52:797–809Google Scholar
  34. Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, Darzins A (2008) Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J 54:621–639Google Scholar
  35. Huang S, Weigel D, Beachy RN, Li J (2016) A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops. Nat Genet 48:109–111Google Scholar
  36. Jaeger D, Winkler A, Mussgnug JH, Kalinowski J, Goesmann A, Kruse O (2017) Time-resolved transcriptome analysis and lipid pathway reconstruction of the oleaginous green microalga Monoraphidium neglectum reveal a model for triacylglycerol and lipid hyperaccumulation. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(97):197Google Scholar
  37. Jakobsen I, Smith SE, Smith FA, Watts-Williams SJ, Clausen SS, Grønlund M (2016) Plant growth responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 are increased by phosphorus sufficiency but not by arbuscular mycorrhizas. J Exp Bot 67(21):6173–6186Google Scholar
  38. Jönsson KI (2007) Tardigrades as a potential model organism in space research. Astrobiology 7:757–766Google Scholar
  39. Katahira S, Muramoto N, Moriya S, Nagura R, Tada N, Yasutani N, Ohkuma M, Onishi T, Tokuhiro K (2017) Screening and evolution of a novel protist xylose isomerase from the termite Reticulitermes speratus for efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(203):203Google Scholar
  40. Kazemi A, Ghorbanpour M (2017) Introduction to environmental challenges in all over the world. In: Ghorbanpour M, Varma A (eds) Medicinal plants and environmental challenges, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing AG, Germany, pp 25–48Google Scholar
  41. Khalid A, Tamaldin N, Jaat M, Ali M, Manshoor B, Zaman I (2013) Impacts of biodiesel storage duration on fuel properties and emissions. Procedia Engineer 68:225–230Google Scholar
  42. Koller M, Muhr A, Braunegg G (2014) Microalgae as versatile cellular factories for valued products. Algal Res 6:52–63Google Scholar
  43. Kotake T, Aohara T, Hirano K, Sato A, Kaneko Y, Tsumuraya Y, Takatsuji H, Kawasaki S (2011) Rice Brittle culm 6 encodes a dominant-negative form of CesA protein that perturbs cellulose synthesis in secondary cell walls. J Exp Bot 62:2053–2062Google Scholar
  44. Koutinas AA, Wang RH, Webb C (2007) The biochemurgist–bioconversion of agricultural raw materials for chemical production. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1:24–38Google Scholar
  45. Kromdijk J, Głowacka K, Leonelli L, Gabilly ST, Iwai M, Niyogi KK, Long SP (2016) Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354:857–861Google Scholar
  46. Kumar S (2015) GM algae for biofuel production: biosafety and risk assessment. Collect Biosaf Rev 9:52–75Google Scholar
  47. Kumar R, Kumar P (2017) Future microbial applications for bioenergy production: a perspective. Front Microbiol 8:1–4Google Scholar
  48. Li Q, Song J, Peng S, Wang JP, Qu GZ, Sederoff RR, Chiang VL (2014) Plant biotechnology for lignocellulosic biofuel production. Plant Biotechnol J 12:1174–1192Google Scholar
  49. Lin MT, Occhialini A, Andralojc PJ, Parry MA, Hanson MR (2014) A faster Rubisco with potential to increase photosynthesis in crops. Nature 513:547–550Google Scholar
  50. Liu R, Chen L, Jiang Y, Zou G, Zhou Z (2017) A novel transcription factor specifically regulates GH11 xylanase genes in Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(194):194Google Scholar
  51. Longobardi P, Magnusson M, Heimann K (2016) Deforestation induced climate change. Effects of spatial scale. PLoS One 11:861–876Google Scholar
  52. Lucas PL, Vuuren DP, Olivier JG, Den Elzen MG (2007) Long-term reduction potential of non-CO 2 greenhouse gases. Environ Sci Pol 10:85–103Google Scholar
  53. Lucht JM (2015) Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses 7:4254–4281Google Scholar
  54. Mackinder L (2018) The Chlamydomonas CO2-concentrating mechanism and its potential for engineering photosynthesis in plants. New Phytol 217:54–61Google Scholar
  55. Maity JP, Bundschuh J, Chen CY, Bhattacharya P (2014) Microalgae for third generation biofuel production, mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment: present and future perspectives—a mini review. Energy 78:104–113Google Scholar
  56. Mathur S, Umakanth A, Tonapi V, Sharma R, Sharma MK (2017) Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(146):146Google Scholar
  57. Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, Harris EH, Karpowicz SJ, Witman GB, Terry A, Salamov A, Fritz-Laylin LK, Maréchal-Drouard L (2007) The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science 318:245–250Google Scholar
  58. Min BR, Solaiman S, Shange R, Eun JS (2014) Gastrointestinal bacterial and methanogenic archaea diversity dynamics associated with condensed tannin-containing pine bark diet in goats using 16S rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing. Int J Microbiol 2014:1–11Google Scholar
  59. Mohan C (2017) Sugarcane biotechnology: challenges and prospects. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–172Google Scholar
  60. Montzka SA, Dlugokencky EJ, Butler JH (2011) Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature 476:43–50Google Scholar
  61. Ng JMS, Han M, Beatty PH, Good A (2016) Genes, meet gases: the role of plant nutrition and genomics in addressing greenhouse gas emissions. In: Edwards D, Batley J (eds) Plant genomics and climate change. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 149–172Google Scholar
  62. Nigam PS, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog Energy Combust 37:52–68Google Scholar
  63. Ohama N, Sato H, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2017) Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends Plant Sci 22:53–65Google Scholar
  64. Pandey A, Lee DJ, Chisti Y, Soccol CR (2013) Biofuels from algae. Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  65. Park S, Croteau P, Boering K, Etheridge D, Ferretti D, Fraser P, Kim KR, Krummel P, Langenfelds R, Van Ommen T (2012) Trends and seasonal cycles in the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide since 1940. Nat Geosci 5:261–265Google Scholar
  66. Patra AK (2012) An overview of antimicrobial properties of different classes of phytochemicals. Dietary phytochemicals and microbes. Springer, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  67. Patra A, Park T, Kim M, Yu Z (2017) Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8:1–13Google Scholar
  68. Pecl GT, Araújo MB, Bell JD, Blanchard J, Bonebrake TC, Chen IC, Clark TD, Colwell RK, Danielsen F, Evengård B et al (2017) Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355(6332):eaai9214Google Scholar
  69. Petrou EC, Pappis CP (2009) Biofuels: a survey on pros and cons. Energy Fuels 23:1055–1066Google Scholar
  70. Pretty J (2008) Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363:447–465Google Scholar
  71. Qin X, Li YE, Wang H, Li J, Wan Y, Gao Q, Liao Y, Fan M (2015) Effect of rice cultivars on yield-scaled methane emissions in a double rice field in South China. J Integr Environ Sci 12:47–66Google Scholar
  72. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Darzins A, Posewitz MC (2010) Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot Cell 9:486–501Google Scholar
  73. Rind D (2002) The Sun’s role in climate variations. Science 296:673–677Google Scholar
  74. Robock A (2000) Volcanic eruptions and climate. Rev Geophys 38:191–219Google Scholar
  75. Ryden P, Efthymiou MN, Tindyebwa TA, Elliston A, Wilson DR, Waldron KW, Malakar PK (2017) Bioethanol production from spent mushroom compost derived from chaff of millet and sorghum. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(1):195Google Scholar
  76. Sakadevan K, Nguyen ML (2017) Livestock production and its impact on nutrient pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, volume 141. Elsevier, pp 147–184. Google Scholar
  77. Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra K, Takara D, Oechsner H, Khanal SK (2015) Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 178:178–186Google Scholar
  78. Scheller S, Goenrich M, Thauer RK, Jaun B (2013) Methyl-coenzyme M reductase from methanogenic archaea: isotope effects on the formation and anaerobic oxidation of methane. J Am Chem Soc 135:14975–14984Google Scholar
  79. Schuchardt U, Sercheli R, Vargas RM (1998) Transesterification of vegetable oils: a review. J Braz Chem Soc 9:199–210Google Scholar
  80. Solomon S, Ivy DJ, Kinnison D, Mills MJ, Neely RR, Schmidt A (2016) Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer. Science 353:269–274Google Scholar
  81. Stern DB, Witman GB (2009) The Chlamydomonas sourcebook (second edition), vol 2. Academic Press, London, p 1040Google Scholar
  82. Su J, Hu C, Yan X, Jin Y, Chen Z, Guan Q, Wang Y, Zhong D, Jansson C, Wang F (2015) Expression of barley SUSIBA2 transcription factor yields high-starch low-methane rice. Nature 523:602–606Google Scholar
  83. Sun Z (2018) Bright side of lignin depolymerization: toward new. 118:614–678Google Scholar
  84. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83:1–11Google Scholar
  85. Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ (2017) The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8(7):1–11Google Scholar
  86. Theodorakopoulos N, Lognoul M, Degrune F, Broux F, Regaert D, Muys C, Heinesch B, Bodson B, Aubinet M, Vandenbol M (2017) Increased expression of bacterial amoA during an N 2 O emission peak in an agricultural field. Agric Ecosyst Environ 236:212–220Google Scholar
  87. Tomme P, Warren R, Gilkes N (1995) Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 37:1–81Google Scholar
  88. Trentacoste E, Shrestha M, Smith RP, Glé SR, Hartmann C, Hildebrand AC, Gerwick M (2013) Metabolic engineering of lipid catabolism increases microalgal lipid accumulation without compromising growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:19748–19753Google Scholar
  89. Tsai DDW, Chen PH, Ramaraj R (2017) The potential of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration with algae. Ecol Eng 98:17–23Google Scholar
  90. Vallero D (2015) Environmental biotechnology: a biosystems approach. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 1–746Google Scholar
  91. Vanholme R, Demedts B, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W (2010) Lignin biosynthesis and structure. Plant Physiol 153:895–905Google Scholar
  92. Vinayak V, Dhawan AK, Gupta V (2010) PCR primers for identification of high sucrose Saccharum genotypes. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 16:107–111Google Scholar
  93. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1–14Google Scholar
  94. Wang B, Li Y, Wu N, Lan CQ (2008) CO2 bio-mitigation using microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:707–718Google Scholar
  95. Wang J, Chae M, Sauvageau D, Bressler DC (2017) Improving ethanol productivity through self-cycling fermentation of yeast: a proof of concept. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(193):193Google Scholar
  96. Weinberg J, Kaltschmitt M, Wilhelm C (2012) Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from microalgae-based biofuels. Biomass Conversion Bior 2:179–194Google Scholar
  97. Whitney SM, Houtz RL, Alonso H (2011) Advancing our understanding and capacity to engineer nature’s CO 2-sequestering enzyme, Rubisco. Plant Physiol 155:27–35Google Scholar
  98. Wilkerson C, Mansfield S, Lu F, Withers S, Park JY, Karlen S, Gonzales-Vigil E, Padmakshan D, Unda F, Rencoret J (2014) Monolignol ferulate transferase introduces chemically labile linkages into the lignin backbone. Science 344:90–93Google Scholar
  99. Wilkinson S, Mills G, Illidge R, Davies WJ (2012) How is ozone pollution reducing our food supply? J Exp Bot 63:527–536Google Scholar
  100. Wright A, Kennedy P, O’Neill C, Toovey A, Popovski S, Rea S, Pimm C, Klein L (2004) Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22:3976–3985Google Scholar
  101. Yamada K, Suzuki H, Takeuchi T, Kazama Y, Mitra S, Abe T, Goda K, Suzuki K, Iwata O (2016) Efficient selective breeding of live oil-rich Euglena gracilis with fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Sci Rep 6:26327Google Scholar
  102. Yang B, Liu JM, Xiaonian GB, Liu B, Wu T, Jiang Y, Chen F (2017) Genetic engineering of the Calvin cycle toward enhanced photosynthetic CO2 fixation in microalgae. Biotechnol Biofuels 10(1):229Google Scholar
  103. Zeng W, Jiang N, Nadella R, Killen TL, Nadella V, Faik A (2010) A glucurono (arabino) xylan synthase complex from wheat contains members of the GT43, GT47, and GT75 families and functions cooperatively. Plant Physiol 154:78–97Google Scholar
  104. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:235–261Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nasser Delangiz
    • 1
  • Mohammad Behrouzi Varjovi
    • 2
  • Behnam Asgari Lajayer
    • 3
  • Mansour Ghorbanpour
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biotechnology and Breeding, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural and Natural ResourcesUniversity of Mohaghegh ArdabiliArdabilIran
  3. 3.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Tabriz BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTabrizIran
  4. 4.Department of Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesArak UniversityArakIran

Personalised recommendations