Advertisement

Physical model study on geo-tube with gabion boxes for the application of coastal protection

  • Selvaraj Sherlin Prem Nishold
  • Ranganathan SundaravadiveluEmail author
  • Nilanjan Saha
Original Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Shoreline erosion takes place due to the movement of sand by tides, wave actions, and wave-induced currents. The conventional techniques used for coastal protection such as artificial armor units and rubble mound are costly, and transportation is difficult in remote areas. Moreover, they may not be suitable for poor soil conditions. In this paper, the detailed physical experimental studies were carried out for a geo-tube saline embankment with ten geo-tubes in a four-layer configuration in a wave flume. This soft engineering solution may be particularly viable since the location is remote with poor soil strata. The studies include a scaled model (1:10) of geo-tube embankment with and without gabion boxes to check its possible utilization for coastal protection. The model is tested in the deep wave flume equipped with a piston type wave maker. The embankment is studied for two different water depths of 0.4 m and 0.5 m. The chosen 0.4-m water depth characterizes the high tide condition, while the 0.5-m water depth reproduces the combined high tide and storm surge conditions. The regular wave heights are varied in the range of 2 to 16 cm with a corresponding wave period of 1.5 to 2.2 s. Three probe methods are used to obtain the hydrodynamic parameters, based on which a geo-tube embankment protected with gabion box as armor is designed and constructed along the coast of Pentha (Odisha, India).

Keywords

Physical modeling Coastal hydrodynamics Shoreline protection and erosion Geo-tube saline embankment Gabion protection 

References

  1. Bezuijen A, De Groot MB, Breteler MK, Berendsen E (2004, March) Placing accuracy and stability of geocontainers. In Proc. EuroGeo3 Third European Geosynthetics Conference, vol 3Google Scholar
  2. Cho S-M (2009) Geotechinical design of the Incheon bridge. In: International Commemorative Symposium for the Incheon Bridge, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Angremond K, van den Berg EJF, de Jager JH (1992) Use and behavior of gabions in coastal protection. In: 23rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering 1992. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 1748–1757Google Scholar
  4. Das Neves L, Lopes ML, Veloso-Gomes F, Taveira-Pinto F (2009) Experimental stability analysis of geotextile sand-filled containers for dune erosion control. J Coast Res 56:487–490Google Scholar
  5. Feagin RA (2005) Artificial dunes created to protect property on Galveston Island, Texas: the lessons learned. Ecol Restor 23:89–94.  https://doi.org/10.3368/er.23.2.89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris LE, Sample JW (2009) The evolution of multi-celled sand-filled geosynthetic systems for coastal protection and surfing enhancement. Reef J 1:1–15Google Scholar
  7. Heerten G, Wittmann L (1985) Filtration properties of geotextile and mineral filters related to river and canal bank protection. Geotext Geomembr 2:47–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(85)90011-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hughes SA, Fowler JE (1995) Estimating wave-induced kinematics at sloping structures. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 121:209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1995)121:4(209) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim H-J, Won M-S, Jamin JC (2015) Finite-element analysis on the stability of geotextile tube-reinforced embankments under scouring. Int J Geomech 15:06014019.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leshchinsky D, Leshchinsky O, Ling HI, Gilbert PA (1996) Geosynthetic tubes for confining pressurized slurry: some design aspects. J Geotech Eng 122:682–690.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:8(682) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luettich SM, Giroud JP, Bachus RC (1992) Geotextile filter design guide. Geotext Geomembr 11:355–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(92)90019-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mansard EPD, Funke ER (1980) The measurement of incident and reflected spectra using a least squares method. Proc 17th Conf Coast Eng Sydney, Australia 154–172Google Scholar
  13. Prem Nishold SS, Sundaravadivelu Ranganathan, Nilanjan Saha (2018) Geotextile Tube and Gabion Armoured Seawall for Coastal Protection - An alternative. In: 34th PIANC World Congress 2018. Panama City, PanamaGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Donoghue T (2014) Book review: “users guide to physical modelling and experimentationn: experience of the HYDRALAB network. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics 167(4):195–195.  https://doi.org/10.1680/eacm.14.00013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parab SR Chodankar DS, Shirgaunkar RM, Fernandes M, Parab AB, Aldonkar SS, Savoikar PP (2011) Geotubes for beach erosion control in Goa. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering 04(06):1013–1016Google Scholar
  16. Pilarczyk K (2008) Alternatives for coastal protection. J Water Resour Enviromental Eng:181–188Google Scholar
  17. Recio J, Oumeraci H (2009) Processes affecting the hydraulic stability of coastal revetments made of geotextile sand containers. Coast Eng 56:260–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shin EC, Oh YI (2007) Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile tube technology. Geotext Geomembr 25:264–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Takahashi S (1997) Breakwater design. Chapter in Book: Handbook of Port and Harbor Engineering. Springer US, Boston, pp 951–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. US Army Engineer Watetways Experiment Station (1986) Use of gabions in the coastal environment. Coastal Engineering Technical Note, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Accessed online- https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1003864.pdf
  21. van Steeg P, Bezuijen A, Zengerink E, de Gijt J (2013) Large scale physical model tests on sand-filled geotextile tubes and containers under wave attack. Coast Struct 2011:1083–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814412216_0094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Welsby JMM (1957) Hydraulics research: a review of novel shore protection methods. Nature 180:171–171.  https://doi.org/10.1038/180171c0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wuthrich D, Chanson H (2014) Hydraulics, air entrainment, and energy dissipation on a gabion stepped weir. J Hydraul Eng 2:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000919. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yuliastuti DI, Hashim AM (2011) Wave transmission on submerged rubble mound breakwater using L-blocks. In: International conference on Environmental Science and Technology. pp 243–248Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selvaraj Sherlin Prem Nishold
    • 1
  • Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nilanjan Saha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ocean EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations