Advertisement

Using multiple superpixel segmentation and merging of digital image method to auto-estimate gravel grain size

  • Chao Wang
  • Rui YuanEmail author
  • Yuqiu Sun
  • Changsheng Chen
  • Huimin Zhang
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The study of grain size distribution of gravels is an important and challenging issue in stratigraphy and morphology, especially in the field of automated measurement. It largely reduces many manual processes and time consumption. Using digital image processing method to extract effective information from digital images is a more advanced method. In this study, a digital image method using automated multiple superpixel segmentation and merging is proposed for extraction of the grain size data. It adds grain size estimation and improved merging rules and repeated execution rules to the superpixel segmentation and merging. It has made great improvements in many respects, especially in the accuracy of edge segmentation and measurement. Compared with manual measurement and other image processing ways, the method proposed in this paper is an efficient approach for precisely measuring the grain size distribution of riverbed material.

Keywords

Grain size distribution Superpixel segmentation and merging Auto-estimation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive reviews on the manuscript and the editors for carefully revising the manuscript.

Funding information

This research is financially supported by the Scientific Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education (no. Q20181310) and Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources (Yangtze University), Ministry of Education (no. K2018-21). The supports are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Süsstrunk S (2010) Slic superpixels (No. EPFL-REPORT-149300)Google Scholar
  2. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Süsstrunk S (2012) SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34:2274–2282.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams J (1979) Gravel size analysis from photographs. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civil Eng 105(10):1247–1255Google Scholar
  4. Baptista P, Cunha TR, Gama C, Bernardes C (2012) A new and practical method to obtain grain size measurements in sandy shores based on digital image acquisition and processing. Sediment Geol 282:294–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm 58(3–4):239–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler JB, Lane SN, Chandler JH (2001) Automated extraction of grain-size data from gravel surfaces using digital image processing. J Hydraul Res 39(5):519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2001.9628276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang FJ, Chung CH (2012) Estimation of riverbed grain-size distribution using image-processing techniques. J Hydrol 440:102–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung CH, Chang FJ (2013) A refined automated grain sizing method for estimating river-bed grain size distribution of digital images. J Hydrol 486:224–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham DG, Reid I, Rice SP (2005a) Automated sizing of coarse grained sediments: image processing procedures. Math Geol 37(1):1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-8745-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham DG, Rice SP, Reid I (2005b) A transferable method for the automated grain sizing of river gravels. Water Resour Res 41:W07020.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham DG, Rollet AJ, Piegay H, Rice SP (2010) Maximizing the accuracy of image-based surface sediment sampling techniques. Water Resour Res 46:W02508.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haris K, Efstratiadis SN, Maglaveras N, Katsaggelos AK (1998) Hybrid image segmentation using watersheds and fast region merging. IEEE T Image Process 7(12):1684–1699.  https://doi.org/10.1109/83.730380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kellerhals R, Bray DI (1971) Sampling procedure for fluvial sediment. ASCE J Hydraul Div 97:1165–1180Google Scholar
  14. Lane SN (2001) The measurement of gravel-bed river morphology. In: Mosley MP (ed) Gravel-bed rivers V. Caxton Press, Christchurch, pp 291–338Google Scholar
  15. Latulippe C, Lapointe MF, Talbot T (2001) Visual characterization technique for gravel-cobble river bed surface sediments; validation and environmental applications Contribution to the programme of CIRSA (Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur le Saumon Atlantique). Earth Surf Process Landforms 26(3):307–318Google Scholar
  16. McEwan IK, Sheen T, Cunningham GJ, Allen AR (2000) Estimating the size composition of sediment surfaces through image analysis. Proc Instn Civ Engrs Water & Mar Engng 142:189–195Google Scholar
  17. Parvati K, Rao P, Mariya Das M (2008) Image segmentation using gray-scale morphology and marker-controlled watershed transformation. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2008:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/384346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ren X, Malik J (2003) Learning a classification model for segmentation. Proc of 9th IEEE Int Conf Computer Vision 1:10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238308
  19. Rice SP, Church M (1998) Grain size along two gravel-bed rivers: statistical variation, spatial pattern and sedimentary links. Earth Surf Proc Land 23(4):345–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sime LC, Ferguson RI (2003) Information on grain sizes in gravel-bed rivers by automated image analysis. J Sediment Res 73(4):630–636.  https://doi.org/10.1306/112102730630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singer SB (2008) A new sampler for extracting bed material sediment from sand and gravel beds in navigable rivers. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:2277–2284.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Warrick JA, Rubin DM, Ruggiero P, Harney JN, Draut AE, Buscombe D (2009) Cobble cam: grain-size measurements of sand to boulder from digital photographs and autocorrelation analyses. Earth Surf Proc Land 34(9):1811–1821.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Q, Tan KH, Ahuja N (2009) Real-time O (1) bilateral filtering. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on (pp. 557–564) . IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206542

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chao Wang
    • 1
  • Rui Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yuqiu Sun
    • 1
  • Changsheng Chen
    • 1
  • Huimin Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information and MathematicsYangtze UniversityJingzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas ResourcesYangtze University, Ministry of EducationWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations