Advertisement

Spatial variability analysis and mapping of soil physical and chemical attributes in a salt-affected soil

  • Masoomeh DelbariEmail author
  • Peyman Afrasiab
  • Bahram Gharabaghi
  • Meysam Amiri
  • Armand Salehian
Original Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Knowledge of inherent spatial variability of soil physical and chemical properties is needed for more accurate site-specific management of soil nutrients. In this study we investigated the spatial variability of a wide range of soil physical and chemical properties including soil texture fractions (percentages of sand, silt, and clay denoted as Sand, Silt and Clay, respectively), soil water content (WC), bulk density (BD), gypsum, organic carbon (OC), electrical conductivity (EC), pH, Ca, Mg, Na, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), sodium absorption ratio (SAR), available phosphorous (AP), and available potassium (AK) in a saline-alkaline soil catena in Sistan Plain, southeast of Iran. Soil samples were collected from two depths (0–15 and 15–30 cm) on a nearly regular grid at 113 sites over an 85-ha agricultural field. Statistical analysis of soil properties showed that Na, Mg, Ca, WC, EC, ESP, and SAR have a large coefficient of variation (CV) (more than 50%) and BD and pH have a low CV (less than 15%) for both layers. The correlation among soil properties varies for two layers; while Silt, WC, EC, ESP, Na, and gypsum are statistically (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) correlated with most of physical and chemical properties in topsoil, Sand, EC, and OC are the most dominant properties in subsoil. Geostatistical autocorrelation analysis of soil properties were examined based on the “range of spatial continuity” and “nugget to sill” ratio. Accordingly, AP and subsoil ESP have the lowest spatial correlation while texture fractions are the most auto-correlated variables in space. The spatial structure of soil properties followed either a spherical or an exponential model with a minimum correlation distance of 70 m for AP to almost 800 m for soil fractions. The results indicated that spatial continuity generally increases and decreases with depth for soil physical and chemical properties, respectively. The difference in spatial variability of soil properties could be attributed to internal factors (e.g., the forming processes of soil) as well as external factors (e.g., human activities). The maps of soil physical and quality parameters were generated using either kriging or inverse distance weighting methods depending on cross-validation results. In general, topsoil layer has a greater amount of EC, ESP, SAR, pH, Na, Ca, Mg, and OC than subsoil while Silt, WC, and gypsum were often higher in subsoil. OC maps showed that the whole area is relatively low in organic carbon, mainly due to hot and dry climate and windy conditions in Sistan. The maps of soil nutrients provide useful information for adapting an efficient and precision agricultural production management.

Keywords

Kriging Spatial correlation Soil nutrients Site-specific management Saline-sodic soil 

References

  1. Abegaz A, Adugna A (2015) Effects of soil depth on the dynamics of selected soil properties among the highlands resources of northeast Wollega, Ethiopia: are these sign of degradation? Solid Earth Discussions 7(3)Google Scholar
  2. Adhikari G, Bhattacharyya KG (2015) Correlation of soil organic carbon and nutrients (NPK) to soil mineralogy, texture, aggregation, and land use pattern. Environ Monit Assess 187:735Google Scholar
  3. Afrasiab P, Delbari M (2013) Assessing the risk of soil vulnerability to wind erosion through conditional simulation of soil water content in Sistan plain, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 70:2895–2905Google Scholar
  4. Amini M, Afyuni M, Khademi H, Abbaspour KC, Schulin R (2005) Mapping risk of cadmium and lead contamination to human health in soils of Central Iran. Sci Total Environ 347:64–77Google Scholar
  5. Ayoubi SH, Mohammad Zamani S, Khormali F (2012) Spatial variability of some soil properties for site specific farming in northern Iran. Intl J Plant Prod 1(2):225–236Google Scholar
  6. Basso B, Ritchie JT (2015) Simulating crop growth and biogeochemical fluxes in response to land management using the SALUS model. In: The ecology of agricultural landscapes: long-term research on the path to sustainability. Oxford University press, New York, NY USA, pp 252–274Google Scholar
  7. Basso B, Bertocco M, Sartori L, Martin EC (2007) Analyzing the effects of climate variability on spatial pattern of yield in a maize-wheat-soybean rotation. Eur J Agron 26:82–91Google Scholar
  8. Bhatti AU, Bakhsh A, Afzal M, Gurmani AH (1999) Spatial variability of soil properties and wheat yields in an irrigated field. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:1279–1290Google Scholar
  9. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute, a., Ed., methods of soil analysis, part 1-physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd ed. agronomy monograph 9, am Soc Agron-soil Sci Soc am, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumfield TJ, Zhi-Hong XU, Prasolova NV (2007) Sampling size required for determining soil carbon and nitrogen properties at early establishment of second rotation hoop pine plantations in subtropical Australia. Pedosphere 17:706–711Google Scholar
  11. Boekhold AE, Van der Zee SE (1992) Significance of soil chemical heterogeneity for spatial behavior of cadmium of cadmium in field soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:747–754Google Scholar
  12. Bogunovic I, Trevisani S, Seput M, Juzbasic D, Durdevic B (2017) Short-range and regional spatial variability of soil chemical properties in an agro-ecosystem in eastern Croatia. Catena 154:50–62Google Scholar
  13. Bouma J, Stoorvogel J, van Alphen BJ, Booltink HWG (1999) Pedology, precision agriculture, and the changing paradigm of agricultural research. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(6):1763–1768Google Scholar
  14. Box GE, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J Royal Stat Soc Series B (Methodological) 26:211–252Google Scholar
  15. Brouder SM, Hofmann BS, Morris DK (2005) Mapping Soil pH. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:427–442Google Scholar
  16. Brus DJ, Heuvelink GBM (2007) Optimization of sample patterns for universal kriging of environmental variables. Geoderma 138:86–95Google Scholar
  17. Burgess TM, Webster R (1980) Optimal interpolation and isar1thmic mapping of soil properties. Eur J Soil Sci 31:315–331Google Scholar
  18. Callesen I, Liski J, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Olsson MT, Tau-Strand L, Vesterdal L, Westman CJ (2003) Soil carbon stores in Nordic well-drained forest soils—relationships with climate and texture class. Glob Chang Biol 9:358–370Google Scholar
  19. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511Google Scholar
  20. Cemek B, Guler M, Kilic K, Demir Y, Arslan H (2007) Assessment of spatial variability in soil properties as related to soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra plain in northern Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 124:223–234Google Scholar
  21. Chung CK, Chong SK, Varsa EC (1995) Sampling strategies for fertility on a stoy silt loam soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26(5-6):741–763Google Scholar
  22. Clark I (1979) Practical geostatistics. Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Loiskandl W (2009) Using sequential Gaussian simulation to assess the field-scale spatial uncertainty of soil water content. Catena 79:163–169Google Scholar
  24. Delbari M, Loiskandl W, Afrasiab P (2010) Uncertainty assessment of soil organic carbon content spatial distribution using geostatistical stochastic simulation. Soil Res 48:27–35Google Scholar
  25. Delbari M, Afrasiab P, Loiskandl W (2011) Geostatistical analysis of soil texture fractions on the field scale. Soil Water Res 6:173–189Google Scholar
  26. Eswaran H, Reich PF (2005) World soil map. In: Hillel D, Hatfield JL (eds) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment (Vol. 3). Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Evrendilek F, Celik I, Kilic S (2004) Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediterranean forest, grassland, and cropland ecosystems in Turkey. J Arid Environ 59:743–752Google Scholar
  28. Fu W, Tunney H, Zhang C (2010) Spatial variation of soil nutrients in a dairy farm and its implications for site-specific fertilizer application. Soil Tillage Res 106:185–193Google Scholar
  29. Gallardo A, Paramá R (2007) Spatial variability of soil elements in two plant communities of NW Spain. Geoderma 139:199–208Google Scholar
  30. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis, hydrometer method. In a Klute et al. (eds.) methods of soil analysis, part I.3rd ed., am Soc Agron, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  31. Geypens M, Vanongeval L, Vogels N, Meykens J (1999) Spatial variability of agricultural soil fertility parameters in a gleyic podzol of Belgium. Precis Agric 1:319–326Google Scholar
  32. Gomez JA, Vanderlinden K, Nearing MA (2005) Spatial variability of surface roughness and hydraulic conductivity after disk tillage: implications for runoff variability. J Hydrol 311:143–156Google Scholar
  33. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Goovaerts P (1998) Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils 27:315–334Google Scholar
  35. Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state of the art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45Google Scholar
  36. Goovaerts P, AvRuskin G, Meliker J, Slotnick M, Jacquez G, Nriagu J (2005) Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of Southeast Michigan. Water Resour Res 41:1–19Google Scholar
  37. Gotway CA, Ferguson RB, Hergert GW, Peterson TA (1996) Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1237–1247Google Scholar
  38. Goulard M, Voltz M (1992) Linear coregionalization model: tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Math Geol 24(3):269–286Google Scholar
  39. Guo Y, Amundson R, Gong P, Yu Q (2006) Quantity and spatial variability of soil carbon in the conterminous United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(2):590–600Google Scholar
  40. Haan CT (2002) Statistical methods in hydrology. The Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Hirzel A, Guisan A (2002) Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecol Model 157:331–341Google Scholar
  42. Huang X, Skidmore EL, Tibke G (2001) Spatial variability of soil properties along a transect of CRP and continuously cropped land. Sustaining the Global Farm: 24–29Google Scholar
  43. Iqbal J, Thomasson JA, Jenkins JN, Owens PR, Whisler FD (2005) Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1338–1350Google Scholar
  44. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied Geostatistics: Oxford University press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Jawad IT, Taha MR, Majeed ZH, Khan TA (2014) Soil stabilization using lime: advantages, disadvantages and proposing a potential alternative. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 8:510–520Google Scholar
  46. Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Karlen DL, Wollenhaupt NC, Erbach DC, Berry EC, Swan JB, Eash NS, Jordahl JL (1994) Long-term tillage effects on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res 32:313–327Google Scholar
  48. Kerry R, Oliver MA (2004) Average variograms to guide soil sampling. Intl J Appl Earth Obs 5(4):307–325Google Scholar
  49. Kravchenko A, Bullock DG (1999) A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron J 91:393–400Google Scholar
  50. Lal R (1990) Soil erosion and land degradation: the global risks. In advances in soil science. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Lal R (2015) Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7:5875–5895Google Scholar
  52. Laslett GM, McBratney AB, Pahl P, Hutchinson MF (1987) Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH. Eur J Soil Sci 38:325–341Google Scholar
  53. Lehmann J, Schroth G (2003) Nutrient leaching. Trees, crops, and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. Wallingford, UK: CAB international: 151-166Google Scholar
  54. Li J, Okin GS, Alvarez L, Epstein H (2008) Effects of wind erosion on the spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in two desert grassland communities. Biogeochemistry 88:73–88Google Scholar
  55. Ma Y, Minasny B, Wu C (2017) Mapping key soil properties to support agricultural production in eastern China. Geoderma Reg 10:144–153Google Scholar
  56. MacCarthy DS, Agyare WA, Vlek PLG, Adiku SGK (2013) Spatial variability of some soil chemical and physical properties of an agricultural landscape. West Afr J Appl Ecol 21(2013):47–61Google Scholar
  57. McBratney AB, Webster R (1983) How many observations are needed for regional estimation of soil properties? Soil Sci 135:177–183Google Scholar
  58. McGrath D, Zhang C, Carton OT (2004) Geostatistical analyses and hazard assessment on soil lead in Silvermines area, Ireland. Environ Pollut 127:239–248Google Scholar
  59. McGrath D, Zhang C (2003) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of Ireland. Appl Geochem 18(10):1629–1639Google Scholar
  60. Mirakzehi K, Pahlavan-Rad MR, Shahriari A, Bameri A (2018) Digital soil mapping of deltaic soils: a case of study from Hirmand (Helmand) river delta. Geoderma 313:233–240Google Scholar
  61. Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, p 304Google Scholar
  62. Mulla DJ (1991) Using geostatistics and GIS to manage spatial patterns in soil fertility. In: Kranzler G (ed) Automated Agriculture for the 21st Century. Am. Soc. Ag. Eng, St. Joseph, pp 336–345Google Scholar
  63. Nichols JD (1984) Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in the southern Great Plains 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1382–1384Google Scholar
  64. Norušis MJ (2002) SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  65. USDA-NRCS (1996) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigations report 42, Version 3.0. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  66. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorous in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Cire. 939. U. S. Gov. print. Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  67. Ontl TA, Schulte LA (2012) Soil carbon storage. Nat Educ Knowledge 3:35Google Scholar
  68. Reeves DW (1997) The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil Tillage Res 43:131–167Google Scholar
  69. Rhoades JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis part 3-chemical methods, am Soc Agron, MedisonGoogle Scholar
  70. Robertson GP (2008) GS+: Geostatistics for the environmental sciences. Gamma Design Software, PlainwellGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2006) Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 50:97–108Google Scholar
  72. Rosemary F, Indraratne SP, Weerasooriya R, Mishra U (2017) Exploring the spatial variability of soil properties in an Alfisol soil catena. Catena 150:53–61Google Scholar
  73. Safadoust A, Doaei N, Mahboubi AA, Mosaddeghi MR, Gharabaghi B, Voroney P, Ahrens B (2016a) Long-term cultivation and landscape position effects on aggregate size and organic carbon fractionation on surface soil properties in semi-arid region of Iran. Arid Land Res Manag 30:345–361Google Scholar
  74. Safadoust A, Amiri Khaboushan E, Mahboubi AA, Gharabaghi B, Mosaddeghi MR, Ahrens B, Hassanpour Y (2016b) Comparison of three models describing bromide transport affected by different soil structure types. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:674–687Google Scholar
  75. Sakin E (2012a) Organic carbon organic matter and bulk density relationships in arid-semi arid soils in Southeast Anatolia region. Afr J Biotechnol 11:1373–1377Google Scholar
  76. Sakin E (2012b) Relationships between of carbon, nitrogen stocks and texture of the Harran plain soils in southeastern Turkey. Bulgarian J Agri Sci 18:626–634Google Scholar
  77. Salem BB (1989) Arid zone forestry: a guide for field technicians (no. 20). Food and agriculture organization (FAO)Google Scholar
  78. Schepers JS, Schlemmer MR, Ferguson RB (2000) Site-specific considerations for managing phosphorus. J Environ Qual 29:125–130Google Scholar
  79. Schollenberger CJ, Simon RH (1945) Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soil-ammonium acetate method. Soil Sci 59:13–24Google Scholar
  80. Sharma P, Singh G, Singh RP (2011) Conservation tillage, optimal water and organic nutrient supply enhance soil microbial activities during wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation. Braz J Microbiol 42:531–542Google Scholar
  81. Shukla MK, Slater BK, Lal R, Cepuder P (2004) Spatial variability of soil properties and potential management classification of a chernozemic field in lower Austria. Soil Sci 169(12):852–860Google Scholar
  82. Soil Survey Division Staff (2017) Soil survey manual. 4th In USDA Handbook 18, USDA-Nat. Resour. Conserv. Serv., Ed Ditzler C, Scheffe K, Monger HC, Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  83. Stang C, Gharabaghi B, Rudra R, Golmohammadi G, Mahboubi AA, Ahmed SI (2016) Conservation management practices: success story of the hog creek and sturgeon river watersheds, Ontario, Canada. J Soil and Water Conserv 71:237–248Google Scholar
  84. Sun B, Zhou S, Zhao Q (2003) Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma 115:85–99Google Scholar
  85. Tabor JA, Warrick AW, Myers DE, Pennington DA (1985) Spatial variability of nitrate in irrigated cotton: II. soil nitrate and correlated variables 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49(2):390–394Google Scholar
  86. Tanner S, Katra I, Haim A, Zaady E (2016) Short-term soil loss by eolian erosion in response to different rain-fed agricultural practices. Soil Tillage Res 155:149–156Google Scholar
  87. Thayer WC, Griffith DA, Goodrum PE, Diamond GL, Hassett JM (2003) Application of geostatistics to risk assessment. Risk Anal 23:945–960Google Scholar
  88. Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil activity. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Method of soil analysis, part 3. Am Soc Agron, MedisonGoogle Scholar
  89. Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Uehara G (1985) Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv Agron 38:45–94Google Scholar
  90. US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook 60. US Government Printing Office, Washington D CGoogle Scholar
  91. Vachaud G, Chen T (2002) Sensitivity of computed values of water balance and nitrate leaching to within soil class variability of transport parameters. J Hydrol 264:87–100Google Scholar
  92. Van Alphen JG, de los Ríos Romero F (1971) Gypsiferous soils: notes on their characteristics and management (no. 12). ILRIGoogle Scholar
  93. Vasu D, Singh SK, Sahu N, Tiwary P, Chandran P, Duraisami VP, Kalaiselvi B (2017) Assessment of spatial variability of soil properties using geospatial techniques for farm level nutrient management. Soil Tillage Res 169:25–34Google Scholar
  94. Walter C, McBratney AB, Douaoui A, Minasny B (2001) Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the Chelif Valley, Algeria, using local ordinary kriging with local variograms versus whole-area variogram. Soil Res 39(2):259–272Google Scholar
  95. Wang G, Gertner G, Howard H, Anderson A (2008) Optimal spatial resolution for collection of ground data and multi-sensor image mapping of a soil erosion cover factor. J Environ Manag 88:1088–1098Google Scholar
  96. Warrick AW (1998) Spatial variability. In: Hillel D (ed) Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  97. Wollenhaupt NC, Wolkowski RP, Clayton MK (1994) Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application. J Prod Agri 7:441–448Google Scholar
  98. Yan H, Wang S, Wang C, Zhang G, Patel N (2005) Losses of soil organic carbon under wind erosion in China. Glob Chang Biol 11:828–840Google Scholar
  99. Yu J, Li Y, Han G, Zhou D, Fu Y, Guan B, Wang G, Ning K, Wu H, Wang J (2014) The spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta. Environ Earth Sci 72:589–599Google Scholar
  100. Zhang C (2006) Using multivariate analyses and GIS to identify pollutants and their spatial patterns in urban soils in Galway, Ireland. Environ Pollut 142(3):501–511Google Scholar
  101. Zhang WT, Hong-Qi WU, Hai-Bin GU, Guang-Long FENG, Ze WANG, Sheng JD (2014) Variability of soil salinity at multiple spatio-temporal scales and the related driving factors in the oasis areas of Xinjiang, China. Pedosphere 24:753–762Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and SoilUniversity of ZabolZabolIran
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  3. 3.Department of Water Resources, Hamoun International Wetland Research InstituteUniversity of ZabolZabolIran

Personalised recommendations