Advertisement

Petrography and geochemistry of the Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks from the Batal Formation of Spiti Basin: implication on provenance

  • Shivani PandeyEmail author
  • Suraj K. Parcha
  • Pankaj K. Srivastava
Original Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

The petrography and geochemistry of the siliciclastic rocks of Batal Formation, Spiti Basin were studied to define the provenance, tectonic setting, and depositional environment. Petrographical studies show that the percentage of quartz in sandstone varies from 70 to 80%, whereas in siltstone and shale, it varies from 50 to 60%. Similar pattern of chondrite-normalized REE, with enriched LREE, depleted HREE, and a negative Eu anomaly, suggests that the source rock is of felsic type. Significant correlation between Zr versus Yb and ΣHREE indicates that these sediments are influenced by sediment recycling. The Ni/Co and Cu/Zn ratios suggest that sediments were deposited under low to moderate oxygenated conditions, while the CIA values and A-CN-K plot reflect moderate to intense weathered source area with the presence of clay minerals derived during the cold period. The major element–based multidimensional tectonic discrimination diagrams suggest an active marginal setting for the sediments of Batal Formation. Further, the discrimination diagrams equally suggest that these sediments were derived from sedimentary provenance and to some extent from the felsic igneous provenance.

Keywords

Neoproterozoic Tectonic setting Provenance Depositional environment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, for providing facilities and giving permission to publish this work. We are highly thankful to Dr. Hakim Rai for providing his valuable suggestions and scientific inputs to shape the manuscript in the present form. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful reviews.

Funding information

This work was carried out under the Project SR/FTP/ES-111/20014 funded by the Science and Engineering Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

References

  1. Ahmad AHM, Noufal KN, Masroor AM, Khan T (2014) Petrography and geochemistry of Jumara dome sediments, Kachchh Basin: implications for provenance, tectonic setting and weathering intensity. Chin J Geochem 33:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anaya-Gregorio A, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Machain-Castillo ML, Montiel-García PC, Ramos-Vázquez MA (2018) Textural and geochemical characteristics of late Pleistocene to Holocene fine-grained deep-sea sediment cores (GM6 and GM7), recovered from southwestern Gulf of Mexico. J Palaeogeogr 187:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong-Altrin JS (2009) Provenance of sands from Cazones Acapulco and Bahia Kino beaches, Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Geol 26(3):764–782Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong-Altrin JS (2015) Evaluation of two multi-dimensional discrimination diagrams from beach and deep sea sediments from the Gulf of Mexico and their application to Precambrian clastic sedimentary rocks. Int Geol Rev 57(11–12):1446–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Verma SP (2005) Critical evaluation of six tectonic setting discrimination diagrams using geochemical data of Neogene sediment from known tectonic settings. Sediment Geol 177:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Lee YI, Kasper-Zubillaga JJ, Carranza-Edwards A, Garcia D, Eby N, Balaram V, Cruz-Ortiz NL (2012) Geochemistry of beach sands along the Western Gulf of Mexico: implication for provenance. Chem Erde - Geochem 72:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagarajan R, Madhavaraju J, Rosalez-Hoz L, Lee YI, Balaram V, Cruz-Martínez A, Avila-Ramírez G (2013) Geochemistry of the Jurassic and UpperCretaceous shales from the Molango Region, Hidalgo, eastern Mexico: implications for source-area weathering, provenance, and tectonic setting. Comptes Rendus Geosci 345:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Machain-Castillo ML, Rosales-Hoz L, Carranza-Edwards A, Sanchez-Cabeza JA, Ruíz-Fernández AC (2015a) Provenance and depositional history of continental slope sediments in the Southwestern Gulf of Mexico unraveled by geochemical analysis. Cont Shelf Res 95:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagarajan R, Balaram V, Natalhy-Pineda O (2015b) Petrography and geochemistry of sands from the Chachalacas and Veracruz beach areas, western Gulf of Mexico, Mexico: constraints on provenance and tectonic setting. J S Am Earth Sci 64:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Lee YI, Juan J, Kasper-Zubillaga J, Trejo-Ramírez E (2017) Mineralogy and geochemistry of sands along the Manzanillo and El Carrizal beach areas, southern Mexico: implications for palaeoweathering, provenance and tectonic setting. Geol J 52:559–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Ramos Vázquez MA, Zavala-León AC, Montiel-García PC (2018) Provenance discrimination between Atasta and Alvarado beach sands, western Gulf of Mexico, Mexico: constraints from detrital zircon chemistry and U–Pb geochronology. Geol J.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3122
  12. Bau M, Dulski P (1996) Distribution of yttrium and rare-earth elements in the Penge and Kuruman iron-formations, Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. Precambrian Res 79:37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhargava ON (2008a) Paleozoic successions of Indian plate; Geol. Soc India Memoir 74:209–244Google Scholar
  14. Bhargava ON (2008b) An update of introduction to the Spiti geology. J Palaeontol Soc India 53(2):113–128Google Scholar
  15. Bhatia MR (1983) Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones. J Geol 91:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhatia MR, Cook KAW (1986) Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins. Contrib Mineral Petrol 92:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox R, Low DR, Cullers RL (1995) The influence of sediment recycling and basement composition on evolution of mudrock chemistry in the southwestern United States. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:2919–2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cullers R L (1994) The controls on the major and trace element variation of shale, siltstone and sandstone of Pennsylvanian- Permian age from uplifted continental blocks in Colorado to platform sediment in Kansas, USA. Geochimica et Cosmochica Acta. 58:4955–4972Google Scholar
  19. Cullers RL, Graf J (1983) Rare earth elements in igneous rocks of the continental crust: intermediate and silicic rocks, ore petrogenesis. In: Henderson P (ed) Rare-Earth Geochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–312Google Scholar
  20. Cullers RL, Bock B, Guidotti C (1997) Elemental distributions and neodymium isotopic compositions of Silurian metasediments, western Maine, USA: redistribution of the rare earth elements. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:1847–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dabard MP (1990) Lower Brioverian formations (Upper Proterozoic) of the Armorican Massif (France): geodynamic evolution of source areas revealed by sandstone petrography and geochemistry. Sediment Geol 69:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dill H (1986) Metallogenesis of early Paleozoic graptolite shales from the Graefenthal Horst (northern Bavaria-Federal Republic of Germany). Econ Geol 81:889–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiPietro JA, Pogue KR (2004) Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of the Himalaya: a view from the west. Tectonics 23:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dragnits E (2000) The Muth Formation in the Pin Valley (Spiti, N-India): depositional environment and ichnofauna of a Lower Devonian barrier island system. Ph D Thesis, University of Vienna. 144 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Dypvik H (1984) Geochemical compositions and depositional conditions of Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous Yorkshire clays, England. Geol Mag 121(5):489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fedo CM, Young GM, Nesbitt GM (1997) Paleoclimatic control on the composition of the Paleoproterozoic Serpent Formation, Huronian Supergroup, Canada: a greenhouse to icehouse transition. Precambrian Res 86:201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank W, Grasemann B, Guntili P, Miller C (1995) Geological map of the Kishtwar, Chamba anf Kulu region, NW Himalaya, India. Jahrb Geol Bundesanst 138:299–308Google Scholar
  28. Fu X, Wang J, Zeng Y, Tan F, Feng X (2010) REE geochemistry of marine oil shale from the Changshe Mountain area, northern Tibet, China. Int J Coal Geol 81:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Govindaraju K (1994) Compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards. Geostand Newslett 18:l58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griesbach CL (1891) Geology of the Central Himalayas. Mem Geol Surv India 23:1–232Google Scholar
  31. Hallberg RO (1976) A geochemical method for investigation of palaeoredox conditions in sediments: Ambio. Spec Rep 4:139–147Google Scholar
  32. Hayden HH (1904) The geology of the Spiti with parts of Bashahr and Rupshu. Mem Geol Surv India Mem 36(1):1–129Google Scholar
  33. Hernández-Hinojosa V, Montiel-García PC, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagarajan R, Kasper-Zubillaga JJ (2018) Textural and geochemical characteristics of beach sands along the Western Gulf of Mexico, Mexico. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sciences 13(1):161–174Google Scholar
  34. Jones B, Manning DAC (1994) Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of paleoredox conditions in ancient mudstones. Chem Geol 111:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar G, Raina BK, Bhargava ON, Maithy PK, Babu R (1984) The Precambrian-Cambrian boundary problem and its prospects, northwest Himalaya, India. Geol Mag 121(3):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madhavaraju J (2015) Geochemistry of Campanian–Maastrichtian sedimentary rocks in the Cauvery basin, south India; In: Ramkumar M (ed) Constraints on paleoweathering, provenance and Cretaceous environments. Chemostratigraphy: Concepts, Techniques and Applications, Elsevier Spec. pp 185–214Google Scholar
  37. Madhavaraju J, Lee YI (2010) Influence of Deccan volcanism in the sedimentary rocks of late Maastrichtian–Danian age of Cauvery basin, southeastern India: constraints from Geochemistry. Curr Sci 98:528–537Google Scholar
  38. Madhavaraju J, González-León C M, Yong Il Lee, Armstrong-Altrin J S, Reyes-Campero L M, (2010) Geochemistry of the Mural Formation (Aptian-Albian) of the Bisbee Group, Northern Sonora, Mexico: Cretaceous Research 31:400–414Google Scholar
  39. Madhavaraju J, Erik Ramirez-Montoya E, Monreal R, González-Leon CM, Pi-Puig T, Espinoza-Maldonado IG, Grijalva-Noriega FJ (2016) Paleoclimate, paleoweathering and paleoredox conditions of Lower Cretaceous shales from the Mural Limestone, Tuape section, northern Sonora, Mexico: Constraints from clay mineralogy and geochemistry. Rev Mex Cienc Geol 33(1):34–48Google Scholar
  40. McLennan SM, Taylor SR (1991) Sedimentary rocks and crustal evolution: tectonic setting and secular trends. J Geol 99:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLennan SM, Hemming S, McDaniel DK, Hanson GN (1993) Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenamce and tectonics. In: Johnson MJ, Basu A (eds) Processes controlling the composition of clastic sediments. Geological Society of America Special Paper, USA, pp 21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myrow PM, Thompson KR, Hughes NC, Paulsen TS, Sell BK, Parcha SK (2006) Cambrian stratigraphy and depositional history of the northern Indian Himalaya, Spiti Valley, north-Central India. Geol Soc Am 18(3–4):491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myrow PM, Hughes NC, Goodge JW, Fanning CM, Williams IS, Peng S, Bhargava ON, Parcha SK, Pogue KR (2010) Extraordinary transport and mixing of sediment across Himalayan Central Gondwana during the Cambrian–Ordovician. Geol Soc Am Bull 122(9–10):1660–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nagarajan R, Madhavaraju J, Nagendra R, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Moutte J (2007a) Geochemistry of Neoproterozoic shales of the Rabanpalli formation, Bhima basin, northern Karnataka, southern India: implications for provenance and paleoredox conditions; rev. Mex Cienc Geol 24:150–160Google Scholar
  45. Nagarajan R, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagendra R, Madhavaraju J, Moutte J (2007b) Petrography and geochemistry of terrigenous sedimentary rocks in the Neoproterozoic Rabanpalli formation, Bhima basin, southern India: implications for paleoweathering condition, provenance, and source rock composition. J Geol Soc India 70:297–312Google Scholar
  46. Nagarajan R, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Kessler FL, Jong J (2017) Petrological and geochemical constraints on provenance, paleoweathering and tectonic setting of clastic sediments from the Neogene Lambir and Sibuti formations, northwestern Borneo. In: Mazumder R (ed) Sediment provenance. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nesbitt HW, Young GM (1982) Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature 299:715–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nyakairu GWA, Koeerl C (2001) Mineralogical and chemical composition and distribution of rare earth elements in clay-rich sediments from Central Uganda; Geochem. J 35:13–28Google Scholar
  49. Pandey S, Parcha SK (2017) Provenance, tectonic setting and source-area weathering of the lower Cambrian sediments of the Parahio valley in the Spiti basin. India J Earth Syst Sci 126(27)Google Scholar
  50. Ramos-Vázquez M, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Rosales-Hoz L, Machain-Castillo ML, Carranza-Edwards A (2017) Geochemistry of deep-sea sediments in two cores retrieved at the mouth of the Coatzacoalcos river delta, Western Gulf of Mexico. Mex Arab J Geosci 10(6):148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramos-Vázquez M, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Machain-Castillo ML, Gío-Argáez FR (2018) Foraminiferal assemblages, 14C ages, and compositional variations in two sediments cores in the western Gulf of Mexico. J S Am Earth 88:480–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roser BP, Korsch RJ (1986) Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone-mudstone suites using SiO2 content and K2O/Na2O ratio. J Geol 94:635–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roser B P, Korsch R J (1988) Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discrimination function analysis of major-element data. Chemical Geology 67:119–39Google Scholar
  54. Sari A, Koca D (2012) An approach to provenance, tectonic and redox conditions of Jurassic– cretaceous Akkuyu formation, central Taurids, Turkey. Min Res Explor Bull 144:51–74Google Scholar
  55. Srikantia SV (1981) The Lithostratigraphy, sedimentation and structure of the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic formations of Spiti basin in the higher Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh India. In: Sinha AK (ed) Contemporary geoscientific research in Himalaya, vol 1. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Publisher, Dehradun, pp 31–38Google Scholar
  56. Srikantia SV, Bhargava ON (1998) Geology of Himachal Pradesh. Geological Society of India. 406 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Tang Y, Sang L, Yuan Y, Zhang Y, Yang Y (2012) Geochemistry of late Triassic pelitic rocks in the NE part of Songpan–Ganzi basin, western China: implications for source weathering, provenance and tectonic setting. Geosci Front 3(5):647–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1985) The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford 312 pGoogle Scholar
  59. Thakur VC (1980) Tectonics of the central crystallines of western Himalaya. Tectonophysics 62(1–2):141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tobia FH, Aswad KJ (2015) Petrography and geochemistry of Jurassic sandstones, western desert, Iraq: implications on provenance and tectonic setting. Arab J Geosci 8:2771–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Verma SP, Armstrong-Altrin JS (2013) New multi-dimensional diagrams for tectonic discrimination of siliciclastic sediments and their application to Precambrian basins. Chem Geol 355:117–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wronkiewicz DJ, Condie KC (1987) Geochemistry of Archean shales from the Witwatersrand Supergroup, South Africa: source-area weathering and provenance. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51:2401–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zaid SM (2015b) Integrated petrographic, mineralogical, and geochemical study of the late cretaceous-early tertiary Dakhla shales, Quseir-Nile valley province, Central Egypt: implications for source area weathering, provenance, and tectonic setting. Arab J Geosci 8:9237–9259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zaid SM (2015c) Geochemistry of sandstone from the Pliocene Gabir formation, north Marsa Alam, Red Sea, Egypt: implication for provenance, weathering and tectonic setting. J Afr Earth Sci 102:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shivani Pandey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suraj K. Parcha
    • 1
  • Pankaj K. Srivastava
    • 2
  1. 1.Wadia Institute of Himalayan GeologyDehra DunIndia
  2. 2.University of JammuJammuIndia

Personalised recommendations