Advertisement

Future predictions of precipitation and temperature in Iraq using the statistical downscaling model

  • Mustafa Al-MukhtarEmail author
  • Mariam Qasim
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Iraq is facing a critical water crisis that has ever experienced. This necessitates a wise management for present and future water resources. Future water availability is mainly influenced by the impacts of climate changes and to dams in Turkey, Syria, Iran, and northern Iraq. The meteorological parameters obtained from global circulation models (GCM) cannot be used to assess the impacts of future climate changes on the water resources availability at catchment scale. The dynamical or statistical downscaling is employed to transfer the coarse resolution of GCM into a finer. In this study, the future maximum/minimum temperature and precipitation for 12 stations of Iraq were projected for three future periods 2020s (2011–2040), 2050s (2041–2070), and 2080s (2071–2100) from the Canadian GCM model (CanESM2) under different scenarios (RCP2.5, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5) using statistical downscaling model (SDSM). The model was set up utilizing partial correlation and significance level of 0.05 between National Center for Environmental Prediction/Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) parameters as predictors and the local station data as predictand. Subsequently, the model was calibrated and validated against daily data by using 70% of the data for calibration and the remaining 30% for the validation. Thereafter, the calibrated model was applied to downscale future scenarios of CanESM2 predictors. The study proved a satisfactory performance of SDSM for simulation of maximum-minimum temperatures and precipitation for future periods. All considered stations and the scenarios were consistent in predicting increasing trend of maximum-minimum temperature and decreasing trend of precipitations. RCP8.5 scenario shows the worst trend of precipitation and temperature.

Keywords

Statistical downscaling Projections Precipitation Temperature Iraq 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Iraq is acknowledged for their support during the study. The authors are grateful for the IPCC for making the global climate change models freely available.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbasnia M, Tavousi T, Khosravi M (2016) Assessment of future changes in the maximum temperature atselected stations in Iran based on HADCM3 and CGCM3 models. Asia-Pac J Atmos Sci 52(4):371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ansari NA, Ezz-Aldeen M, Knutsson S, Zakaria S (2012) Water harvesting and reservoir optimization in selected areas of south Sinjar Mountain, Iraq. J Hydrol Eng 18:1607–1616.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Awadhi JM (2014) Measurement of air pollution in Kuwait City using passive samplers. ACS Journal 04(02):253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Dousari A (2005) Causes and indicators of land degradation in the North-Western part of Kuwait. Arab Gulf J Sci Res 23(2):69–79Google Scholar
  5. Al-Dousari AM, Al-Hazza A (2013) Physical properties of aeolian sediments within major dune corridor in Kuwait. Arab J Geosci 6(2):519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Ghadban AN et al (1999) Preliminary assessment of the impact of draining of Iraqi marshes on Kuwait’s northern marine environment. Part I. physical manipulation. Water Sci Technol 40(7):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Ghadban AN, Uddin S, Beg MU, Al-Dousari AM, Gevao B, Al-Yamani F (2008) Ecological consequences of river manipulations and drainage of Mesopotamian marshes on the Arabian Gulf ecosystem: investigations on changes in sedimentology and environmental quality, with special reference to Kuwait Bay. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) 9362:1–141Google Scholar
  8. Al-Mukhtar M (2016) Modelling the root zone soil moisture using artificial neural networks, a case study. Environ Earth Sci 75(15):1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Mukhtar M (2018) Integrated approach to forecast future suspended sediment load by means of SWAT and artificial intelligence models, a case study. FOG Journal 51(Jun):52–77Google Scholar
  10. Anandhi A, Shrinivas VV, Nanjundiah RS, Kumar DN (2009) Role of predictors in downscaling surface temperature to river basin in India for IPCC SRES scenarios using support vector machine. Int J Climatol 29(4):583–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen JH, Machenhauer B, Jones RG, Schär C, Ruti PM, Castro M, Visconti G (1997) Validation of presentday regional climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions. Clim Dyn 13:489–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu J, Xia J, Xu CY, Singh V (2010) Statistical downscaling of daily mean temperature, pan evaporation and precipitation for climate change scenarios in Haihe River, China. Theor Appl Climatol 99(1):149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0129-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diaz-Nieto J, Wilby RL (2005) A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the river Thames, United Kingdom. Clim Chang 69(2):245–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1157-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elhakeem A, Elshorbagy WE, AlNaser H, Dominguez F (2015) Downscaling global circulation model projections of climate change for the United Arab Emirates. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(9):04015007Google Scholar
  15. Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27(12):1547–1578.  https://doi.org/10.1002/Joc.1556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gachon P, St-Hilaire A, Ouarda TBM.J, Nguyen VTV, Lin C, Milton J, Chaumont D, Goldstein J, Hessami M, Nguyen TD, Selva F, Nadeau M, Roy P, Parishkura D, Major N, Choux M, Bourque A, (2005) A First Evaluation of the Strength and Weaknesses of Statistical Downscaling Methods for Simulating Extremes over Various Regions of Eastern Canada. Sub-component, Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF), Environment Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 209 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Gagnon S, Singh B, Rousselle J, Roy L (2005) An application of the statistical downscaling model (SDSM) to simulate climatic data for streamflow modelling in Québec. Can Water Resour J 30(4):297–314.  https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3004297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gebremeskel S, Liu YB, de Smedt F, Hoffmann L, Pfister L (2005) Analyzing the effect of climate changes on streamflow using statistically downscaled GCM scenarios. Int J River Basin Manag 2(4):271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giorgi F (1990) Simulation of regional climate using a limited area model nested in a general circulation model. J Clim 3(9):941–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassan Z, Shamsudin S, Harun S (2014) Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature. Theor Appl Climatol 116(1–2):243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hessami M, Gachon P, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A (2008) Automated regression-based statistical downscaling tool. Environ Model Softw 23(6):813–834.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hewitson BC, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Clim Res 7(2):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang J, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Xu C, Wang B, Yao J (2011) Estimation of future precipitation change in the Yangtze River basin by using statistical downscaling method. Stoch Env Res Risk A 25(6):781–792.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0441-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huth R (2002) Statistical downscaling of daily temperature in Central Europe. J Clim 15(13):1731–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1731:sdodti>2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor MM, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1535Google Scholar
  26. Jones RG, Murphy JM, Noguer M (1995) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional climate model. I. Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121(526):1413–1450.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khadka D, Pathak D (2016) Climate change projection for the Marsyangdi river basin, Nepal using statistical downscaling of GCM and its implications in geodisasters. Geoenvironmental Disasters 3:15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0050-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319(1–4):357–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97Google Scholar
  30. Liu J, Williams JR, Wang X, Yang H (2009) Using MODAWEC to generate daily weather data for the EPIC model. Environ Model Softw 24(5):655–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moussa S, Sellami H, Mlayh A (2018) Climate change impact projections at the catchment scale in Tunisia using the multi-model ensemble mean approach. Arab J Geosci 11(8):181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Najafi R, Kermani M (2016) Uncertainty modeling of statistical downscaling to assess climate change impacts on temperature and precipitation. Earth Syst Environ 2:68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0112-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash JE, Sutcliff JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I—adiscussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nimah MN (2008) Water resources (2008) report of the Arab forum for environment and development. In: Tolba MK, Saab NW (eds) Arab environment and future challenges, Chapter 5. Arab Forum for Environment and Development, Cairo, pp 63–74Google Scholar
  36. Romanowicz RJ, Bogdanowicz E, Debele SE, Doroszkiewicz J, Hisdal H, Lawrence D, Meresa HK, Napiórkowski JJ, Osuch M, Strupczewski WG, Wilson D (2016) Climate change impact on hydrological extremes: preliminary results from the polish-Norwegian project. Acta Geophys 64(2):477–509.  https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0009
  37. Singh J, Knapp HV, Arnold JG, Demissie M (2004) Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(2):343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tavakol-Davani H, Nasseri M, Zahraie B (2013) Improved statistical downscaling of daily precipitation using SDSM platform and data-mining methods. Int J Climatol 33:2561–2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wentz FJ, Ricciardulli L, Hilburn K, Mears C (2007) How much more rain will global warming bring? Science 317:233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wetterhall F, Bárdossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Xu C-Y (2009) Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation over Sweden using GCM output. Theor Appl Climatol 96(1):95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0038-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2007) Statistical downscaling model (SDSM), version 4.2. Department of Geography, Lancaster University, LancashireGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilby RL, Wigley TML, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) (1998). Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34:2995–3008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilby RL, Hay LE, Gutowski WJ, Arritt RW, Takle ES, Pan Z, Leavesley GH, Martyn PC (2000) Hydrological responses to dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output. Geophys Res Lett 27(8):1199.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL00607. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM—a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17(2):145–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00060-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilby RL, Whitehead PG, Wade AJ, Butterfield D, Davis RJ, Watts G (2006) Integrated modelling of climate change impacts on water resources and quality in a lowland catchment: river Kennet, UK. J Hydrol 330(1–2):204–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilks DS, Wilby RL (1999) The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models. Prog Phys Geogr 23:329–357.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339902300302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu C-Y (1999) Climate change and hydrologic models: a review of existing gaps and recent research developments. Water Resour Manag 13(5):369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008190900459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang T, Li H, Wang W, Xu C-Y, Yu Z (2012) Statistical downscaling of extreme daily precipitation, evaporation, and temperature and construction of future scenarios. Hydrol Process 26(23):3510–3523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zakaria S et al (2013) Estimation of annual harvested runoff at Sulaymaniyah governorate, Kurdistan region of Iraq. Nat Sci 05(12):1272–1283Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Technology-BaghdadBaghdadIraq
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringAl-Kufa UniversityNajafIraq

Personalised recommendations