Advertisement

The assesment of rockfall analysis near a railroad: a case study at the Kızılinler village of Eskişehir, Turkey

  • Ali KayabaşıEmail author
Original Paper
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

Rockfalls from basaltic lava flow hills and the rockfall hazard for the railroad passing along the Kızılinler village (Odunpazarı/Eskişehir) were investigated in this study. Rockfalls are detected between 14 + 000 and 18 + 750 km on the Eskişehir-Kütahya railroad. This part of the railroad is controlled daily in case of rockfall, and the falling blocks on the railroad are cleared by workers. The rapid weathering of the tuff litology under the basaltic lava flows is the cause of the rockfalls. As a result of the weathering tuff unit, the basalt rock particles fall along the discontinuity surfaces due to the gravity forces. The geology of the rockfall region, the properties of the falling rock blocks, and the length to the railroad were investigated during the field study. During field studies, the rock blocks, greater than 5 m diameter that had passed to the other side of railroad, were recorded. In order to define the geologic properties of the rock mass and joint properties, two scan-line surveys were performed in the study area. A series of the rock block falling simulation studies were held with a computer program. The hazard for the train railroad was determined. A series of simple regression analysis was carried out between the fall height, the horizontal length of the rockfall, and the volume of falling rock blocks, and new empirical equations were determined. The evaluation of the estimation performances of some existing empirical equations for the determination of the runout distance of the rockfall using this study data was also performed. However, the prediction performance of the equations proposed in this study and the previous studies was not significant, except empirical equations derived between the fall height and the horizontal length of rockfall. The Rockfall Risk Rating system was applied at the selected slope sections along the study area. Consequently, the study area was classified as under medium risk. Active and passive protective measures were suggested for the study area.

Keywords

Basalt Eskişehir Railway Rockfall Regression 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Commission for the Scientific Research Projects of the Eskişehir Osmangazi University (Project ID No: 2017-1343).

Supplementary material

12517_2018_4175_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 19 kb)
12517_2018_4175_MOESM2_ESM.docx (118 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 121 kb)
12517_2018_4175_MOESM3_ESM.docx (316 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 315 kb)
12517_2018_4175_MOESM4_ESM.doc (34 kb)
ESM 4 (DOC 34 kb)
12517_2018_4175_MOESM5_ESM.docx (116 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 116 kb)

References

  1. Altunel E, Barka A (1998) Eskisehir Fay Zonu’nun İnonü-Sultandere arasındaki neotektonik aktivitesi. Türk Jeol Bül 2:41–52 [in Turkish with English abstract]Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez Grima M, Babuska R (1999) Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew RD (1994) The Colorado Rockfall Hazard rating system, Colorado Dept. of transportation, Report # CTI-CDOT-2-94Google Scholar
  4. Ansari MK, Ahmad M, Singh R, Singh TN (2015) Correlation between Schmidt hardness and coefficient of restitution of rocks. J Afr Earth Sci 104(1–5):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azzoni A, de Freitas MH (1995) Experimentally gained parameters,decisive for rockfall analysis. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28(2):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton N, Lion R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6:189–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience fromcase histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York 251 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolin H, Lide C, Xuanming P, Guanning L, Xiaoting C, Haogang D, Tianci L (2010) Assessment of the risk of rockfalls in Wu Gorge, Three Gorges, China. Landslides 7:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0170-7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brawner CO and Wyllie D (1975) Rock slope stability on railwayprojects. Proceedings of the American railway engineering association regional meeting, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  11. Budetta P (2004) Assesment of rockfall risk along roads. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:71–81.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budetta P, De Luca C, Nappi M (2016) Quantitative rockfall risk assessment for an important road by means of the rockfall risk management (RO.MA.) method. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1377–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0798-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunce CM, Cruden DM, Morgenstern NR (1997) Assessment of the hazard from rockfall on a highway. Can Geotech J 34:344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen-Chang L, Cheng-Haw L, Hsin-Fu Y, Hung-I L (2011) Modeling spatial fracture intensity as a control on flow in fractured rock. Environ Earth Sci 63:1199–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi Y, Lee JY, Lee J, Park HD (2009) Engineering geological investigation into rockfall problem: a case study of the seated seokgayeorae image carved on a rock face at the UNESCO world heritage site in Korea. Geosci J 13(1):69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Copons R (2004) Avaluacio de la perillositat de caigudes de blocs a ´Andorra la Vella (Principat d’Andorra). Department of Geodinamycs and Geophysics, University of Barcelona, Ph.D. thesis, 244 pp., 12 plates (in Catalan)Google Scholar
  17. Copons R, Vilaplana JM, Linares R (2009) Rockfall travel distance analysis by using empirical models (Sola’d’Andorra la Vella, Central Pyrenees). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:2107–2118 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/2107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corominas J (1996) The angle of reach as a mobility index for small andlarge landslides. Can Geotech J 33:260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corominas J, Copons R, Moya J, Vilaplana JM, Altimir J, Amig’o J (2005) Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rockfall protected area. Landslides 2:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2003) A methodology for physically basedrockfall hazard assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3(5):407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Tuner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Special report of the Transportation Research BrandLandslides. Investigation and Mitigation. Natural Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp 36–75Google Scholar
  22. Domaas U (1994) Geometrical methods of calculating rockfall range, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Report 585910-1, pp 21Google Scholar
  23. Dorren LKA, Maier B, Putters US, Seijmonsbergen AC (2004) Combining field and modelling techniques to assess rockfalldynamics on a protection forest hillslope in the European Alps. Geomorphology 57:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Erismann T, Abele G (2001) Dynamics of rockslides and Rockfalls. Springer, Berlin, p 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans SG, Hungr O (1993) The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes. Can Geotech J 30:620–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finol J, Guo YK, Jing XD (2001) A rule based fuzzy model for theprediction of petrophysical rock parameters. J Pet Sci Eng 29:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fityus SG, Giacomini A, Buzzi O (2013) The significance of geology forthe morphology of potentially unstable rocks. Eng Geol 162:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frattini P, Crosta G, Carrara A, Agliardi F (2008) Assessment ofrockfall susceptibility by integrating statistical and physicallybased approaches. Geomorphology 94(3–4):419–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geniş M, Sakız U, Aydıner BÇ (2017) A stability assessment of the rockfall problem around the Gökgöl tunnel (Zonguldak, Turkey). Bull Eng Geol Environ 76:1237–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0907-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  31. Gözler MZ, Cevher F, ve Küçükayman A (1985) Eskişehir civarının jeolojisi ve su kaynakları. MTA Dergisi, 103/104, s. 40–54, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  32. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Rockfall Hazard and risk assessment along a transportation corridor in the Nera Valley, Central Italy. Environ Manag 34(2):191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoek E (1996) Rock slopes: course notes. American Societyfor Civil Engineers, Pittsburgh Section, Pennsylvania, p 160Google Scholar
  34. Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering, 2nd edn. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holm K, Jakob M (2009) Long rockfall runout, Pascua Lama, Chile. Can Geotech J 46:25–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequencyof rockfalls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Columbia. Can Geotech J 36:224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hungr O, Fletcher L, Jakob M, MacKay C, Evans S G (2003) A system of rockfall and rock slide hazard rating for a railway. Proc. 3rd Canadian conference on Geotechnique and natural hazards (Geohazards 2003), Canada.Google Scholar
  39. Hunter G, Fell R (2003) Travel distance angle for “rapid” landslides in constructed and natural soil slopes. Can Geotech J 40:1123–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hutchinson JN (1988) General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on landslides, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  41. ISRM (2007) Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) The complete rmse suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring:1974–2006. Kozan, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaya Y, Topal T (2015) Evaluation of rock slope stability for a touristic coastal area near Kusadasi, Aydin (Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 74:4187–4199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4473-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kayabasi A (2012) Prediction of pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure of clayey soils by simple and non-linear multiple regression techniques: a case study from Mersin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66:2171–2183.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1439-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C, Ercanoglu M (2003) Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:55–63 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keskin İ (2013) Evaluation of rock falls in an urban area: the case of Boğaziçi(Erzincan/Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 70:1619–1628.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2247-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lied K (1977) Rockfall problems in Norway. In: Rockfall Dynamics and protective work effectiveness. ISMES, Bergamo, vol 90, pp 51–53.Google Scholar
  47. Meißl G (2001) Modelling the runout distances of rockfalls using a geographic information system. Z Geomorphol Suppl 125:129–137Google Scholar
  48. MGM (2018) Turkish State Meteorological Service: https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast- Citiesaspx
  49. Millan P, Matheson GD (1997) A two stage system for highway rock slope assessment. Int J Rock Mech Min Geomech Abstr 34(3–4):196Google Scholar
  50. MTA (2018) XRD analyses report about to Kızılin-Eskişehir. Ankara,Turkey (unpublished, in Turkish), report of the general directorate ofMineral research and exploration. MAT-18002587Google Scholar
  51. Ocakoğlu F (2007) A re-evaluation of the Eskişehir fault zone as a recent extensional structure in NW Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 31:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ocakoğlu F, Açıkalın S (2009) Late Pleistocene fault induced uplift and consequent fluvial response in Eskisehir fault zone NW Anatolia. Z Geomorphol 53(1):121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ocakoğlu F, Açıkalın S (2010) Field evidences of surface rupture occurred during the 20.02.1956 Eskişehir earthquake in the NW Anatolia. J Earth Syst Sci 119(6):841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Palmstrom A (1982) The volumetric joint count - a useful and simple measure of the degree of rock mass jointing. IAEG Congress, New Delhi, pp V221–V228Google Scholar
  55. Paronuzzi P (2009) Rockfall-induced block propagation on a soil slope, northern Italy. Environ Geol 58(7):1451–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pierson LA, Davis SA, and Van Vickle R (1990) Rockfall Hazard rating system – implementation manual, federal HighwayAdministration (FHWA), report FHWA-OR-EG-90–01, FHWA,U.S. Dep. of TranspGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard M, Porter M, Savigny W, Bruce I, Oboni F, Keegan T, and Abbott B (2005) CN rockfall hazard risk management system:experience, enhancements, and future direction. Landslide risk management: proc. of the Int. conference on landslide risk management, Vancouver, BalkemaGoogle Scholar
  58. Rocscience (2002) RocFall software for risk analysis of falling rocks on steep slopes. Rocscience user’s guide, p 59Google Scholar
  59. Santi MP, Russell PC, Higgins DJ, Spriet IJ (2009) Modification and statistical analysis of the Colorado Rockfall Hazard rating system. Eng Geol 104:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saroglou H, Marinos V, Marinos V, Tsiambaos G (2012) Rockfall hazard and risk assesment:an example from a high promontory at the historical site of Monemvasia, Greece. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1823–1836, www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/12/1823/2012/.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scheidegger AE (1973) On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides. Rock Mech 5:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schweigl J, Ferretti C, Nossing L (2003) Geotechnical characterization and rockfall simulation of a slope: a practical case studyfrom South Tyrol (Italy). Eng Geol 67:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seyitoğlu G, Ecevitoğlu GB, Kaypak B, Güney Y, Tün M, Esat K, Avdan U, Temel A, Çabuk A, Telsiz S, Uyar Adlaş GG (2015) Determining the main strand of the Eskişehir strike-slip fault zone using subsidiary structures and seismicity: a hypothesis tested by seismic reflection studies. Turk J Earth Sci 24:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1406-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shreve RL (1968) The Blackhawk landslide. Geol Soc Am S, 108 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh TN, Pradhan SP, Vishal V (2013) Stability of slopes in a fire-prone mine in Jharia coalfield, India. Arab J Geosci 6:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tanarro LM, Munoz J (2012) Rockfalls in the Duraton canyon,Central Spain: inventory and statistical analysis. Geomorphology 169:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tokay F (2001) Neotectonic features of the İnönü-Dodurga segment of the Eskişehir fault zone; Eskişehir Osmangazi University MSc thesis, 67 pp. In Turkish with English abstractGoogle Scholar
  68. Topal T, Akin M, Ozden AU (2007) Assessment of rock fall hazard around Afyon Castle, Turkey. Environ Geol 53:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tunusluoglu MC, Zorlu K (2009) Rockfall hazard assessment in acultural and natural heritage (Ortahisar Castle, CappadociaTurkey). Environ Geol 56:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C, Topal T, Sonmez H, Tuncay E, Erguler ZA, Kasmer O (2006) Assessment of environmentel and engineering geological problems for the possible re-use of an abandoned rock-hewn settlement in Urgup (Cappadocia) Turkey. Environ Geol 50:473–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valagussa A, Frattini P, Crosta GB (2014) Earthquake-induced rockfall hazard zoning. Eng Geol 182:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vandewater CJ, Dunne WM, Mauldon M, Drumm EC, Batemann V (2005) Classifying and assessing the geologic contribution to rockfall hazard. Environ Eng Geosci 11:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varnes DJ (1978) Slopemovement types and processes. In: RL Schuster, RJ Krizek (eds) Landslides, analysis and control. Transportation Research Board, special report no. 176, National Academy of Sciences, pp 11–33Google Scholar
  74. Wieczorek GF, Morrissey MM, Lovine G, Godt J (1998) Rock-Fall hazards in the Yosemite Valley, US Geological Survey Open-file report 98–467, 1:1200, 7 pp., available at: https://greenwood.cr.usgs.gov/pub/open-file-reports/ofr-98-0467
  75. Wieczorek, GF, Stock GM, Reichenbach P, Snyder JB, Borchers JW, Godt JW (2008) Investigation and hazard assesment of the 2003 and 2007 Staircase Falls rock falls, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8, 412–432Google Scholar
  76. Wyllie DC, Mah CW (2004) Rock slope engineering—civil and mining, 4th edn. Spoon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Yagiz S, Gokceoglu C (2010) Application of fuzzy inference system and nonlinear regression models for predicting rock brittleness. Expert Syst Appl 37:2265–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yılmaz I, Yildirim M, Keskin I (2008) A method for mapping thespatial distribution of RockFall computer program analyses results using ArcGIS software. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Al-Kathery M, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimous HD (2015) Assessment of rockfall hazard at Al-Noor Mountain, Makkahcity (Saudi Arabia) using spatio-temporal remote sensing data andfield investigation. J Afr Earth Sci 101:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zorlu K, Tunusluoğlu MC, Gorum T, Nefeslioglu AH, Yalçın A, Turer D, Gökceoglu C (2011) Landform effect on rockfall and hazard mapping in Cappadocia (Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 62:1685–1693.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0653-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations