Advertisement

Use of natural Stipa tenacissima fibers for the removal of H2S in an alkaline aqueous medium

  • Hanen Azaza
  • Lassaad Mechi
  • Mohamed Ben Amor
  • Ismaîl Trabelsi
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The current research aims to use plants as substituent of chemical additives in the elimination of pollutants, therefore making polluting industries environmentally friendly. In the present work, the potential use of Stipa tenacissima (cultivated in the dry region of North Africa) in the removal of H2S in aqueous solution was investigated. The obtained experimental results showed successful elimination of H2S through reaction with Stipa tenacissima fibers in an alkaline aqueous medium. The effect of Stipa tenacissimas mass, temperature ranging 20–60 °C, and aeration on sulfide removal efficiency was examined. The study clearly revealed that the aeration processes enhanced the removal reaction, and the increase in temperature gave a better removal rate with an optimal mass ratio of Stipa tenacissima of 0.1 g to eliminate 0.2 mg H2S.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Air pollution Natural additive Removals of H2Stipa tenacissima fibers 

References

  1. Ahmad AL, Sunarti AR, Lee KT, Fernando WJN (2010) CO2 removal using membrane gas absorption. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4:495–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belmabkhout Y, De Weireld G, Sayari A (2009) Amine-bearing mesoporous silica for CO2 and H2S removal from natural gas and biogas. Langmuir 25:13275–13278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cetin M (2016a) A change in the amount of CO2 at the Center of the Examination Halls: case study of Turkey. Studies on Ethno-Medicine 10(2):146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cetin M, Sevik H, Saat A (2017) Indoor air quality: the samples of Safranbolu Bulak Mencilis cave. Fresenius Environ Bull 26(10):5965–5970Google Scholar
  5. Cetin M, Sevik H, Yigit N (2018a) Climate type-related changes in the leaf micromorphological characters of certain landscape plants. Environ Monit Assess 190:404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cetin M, Sevik H (2016a) Change of air quality in Kastamonu city in terms of particulate matter and CO2 amount. Oxid Commun 39(4-II):3394–3401Google Scholar
  7. Cetin M, Sevik H (2016b) Measuring the impact of selected plants on indoor CO2 concentrations. Pol J Environ Stud 25(3):973–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cetin, M., 2013. Chapter 27: Landscape engineering, protecting soil, and runoff storm water, InTech-Open Science-Open Minds, Online July 1st, 2013. Book: Advances in landscape architecture-environmental sciences, ISBN 978–953–51-1167-2, pp. 697–722.Google Scholar
  9. Cetin, M., 2015. Chapter 55: Using recycling materials for sustainable landscape planning, environment and ecology at the beginning of 21st century, ST. Kliment Ohridski University Press, Sofia, 821 p. ISBN:978–954-07-3999-1, pp. 783–788.Google Scholar
  10. Cetin M, Zeren I, Sevik H, Cakir C, Akpinar H (2018b) A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environ Monit Assess 190(3):167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Kaya O, Sahap A (2018c) Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environ Dev Sustain 20(1):361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cetin M (2016b) Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: a case study of Cide Coastline. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 4(9):800–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang HM, Chung MJ, Park SB (2009) Cryogenic heat-exchanger design for freeze-out removal of carbon dioxide from landfill gas. J Therm Sci Technol 4:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung YC, HO KL, Tseng CP (2007) Two-stage biofilter for effective NH3 removal from waste gases containing high concentrations of H2S. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. David R., Published Date: 19th November 2012. Sulfidic sediments and sedimentary rocks, 65, 1st Edition.Google Scholar
  16. Dennis JS, Scott SA (2010) In situ gasification of a lignite coal and CO2 separation using chemical looping with a Cu-based oxygen carrier. Fuel l89:1623–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díaz I, Ramos I, Fdz-Polanco M (2015) Economic analysis of microaerobic removal of H2S from biogas in full-scale sludge digesters. Bioresour Technol 192:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, McIlvried H, Srivastava RD (2008) Advances in CO2 capture technology – the U. S. Department of Energy’s carbon sequestration program. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabriel D, Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (2004) Conversion of full-scale wet scrubbers to biotrickling filters for H2S control at publicly owned treatment works. J Environ Eng ASCE 130(10):1110–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holtzapple M. T., 2003. Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition, 2nd Edition, pp. 3535–3542.Google Scholar
  21. Kravkaz Kuscu IS, Cetin M, Yigit N, Savaci G, Sevik H (2018) Relationship between enzyme activity (urease-catalase) and nutrient element in soil use. Pol J Environ Stud 5(27):2107–2112.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim WG, Kang HU, Jung KM, Kim SH (2008) Synthesis of silica nanofluid and application to CO2 absorption. Sep Sci Technol 43:3036–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liyuan D, May-Britt H (2014) Carbon nanotube reinforced PVAm/PVA blend FSC nanocomposite membrane for CO2/CH4 separation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 26:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mechi L, Ben AM (2015) Absorption of CO2 in aqueous solution with Stipa tenacissima fibers. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 37:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehtap O, Gozde S, Mehmet FF (2015) Use of zeolites for the removal of H2S: a mini-review 2. Fuel Process Technol 139:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Natalia V, Blinova D, Svec F (2012) Functionalized polyaniline-based composite membranes with vastly improved performance for separation of carbon dioxide from methane. J Membr Sci 423–424:514–521Google Scholar
  27. Nielsen AH, Vollertsen J, Hvitved-Jacobsen T (2004) Chemical sulfide oxidation of wastewater--effects of pH and temperature. Water Sci Technol 50(4):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olumide WA, Doan PM, Nathalie L, Ange N, Yaqian Z (2017) Laboratory-scale investigation of the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas and air using industrial waste-based sorbents. J Environ Chem Eng 5(2):1809–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peiffer S, Gade W (2007) Reactivity of ferric oxides toward H2S at low pH. Environ Sci Technol 41(9):3159–3164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sevik H., Ahmaida E. A., Cetin M., 2017. Chapter 31: Change of the air quality in the urban open and green spaces: Kastamonu sample. Ecology, planning and design. Eds: Irina Koleva, Ulku Duman Yuksel, Lahcen Benaabidate, St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, ISBN: 978–954–07-4270-0, pp. 409–422.Google Scholar
  31. Turkyilmaz A, Sevik H, Cetin M (2018a) The use of perennial needles as biomonitors for recently accumulated heavy metals. Landsc Ecol Eng 14(1):115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turkyilmaz A, Sevik H, Cetin M, Ahmaida Saleh EA (2018b) Changes in heavy metal accumulation depending on traffic density in some landscape plants. Pol J Environ Stud 27(5):2277–2284.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78620,pp.2277-2284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yanming Z, Krishna RP (2013) Gas-phase ozone oxidation of hydrogen sulfide for odor treatment in water reclamation plants. Ozone: science. Engineering 35:390–398Google Scholar
  34. Zhang JZ, Millero FJ (1994) Investigation of metal sulfide complexes in sea water using cathodic stripping square wave voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 284:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang ZJ, Zhang W, Chen X, Xia QB, Li Z (2010) Adsorption of CO2 on zeolite 13X and activated carbon with higher surface area. Sep Sci Technol 45:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang J, TONG Z (2006) H2S removal with cupric chloride for producing sulfur. Chinese. J Chem Eng 14(6):810–813Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit of Materials, Environment and Energy, Faculty of Sciences of GafsaUniversity of GafsaGafsaTunisia
  2. 2.Water Researches and Technologies Center Borj-Cedria TechnoparkUninersity of CartageCarthageTunisia

Personalised recommendations