Advertisement

Effect of fines content and plasticity on undrained shear strength of quartz-clay mixtures

  • Eyyüb Karakan
  • Süleyman Demir
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Data obtained from previous soil borings revealed that, natural soils free of fines are rarely encountered in the field. On this basis, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of plastic fines on mechanical behavior of sand (quartz)-clay mixtures. Two types (bentonite and kaolinite) of clay were mixed with quartz at rates ranging among 0% to 100% by dry weight. Evaluations were made based on changes in threshold fines content (FCt) with clay type and mechanical properties, consistency limits, and compaction characteristics. The results indicate that undrained shear strength (su) decreased up to 30% kaolinite content while increased with bentonite content from 0 to 100% which is an evidence of the effect of clay type on FCt. Furthermore, quartz-kaolinite mixtures have greater maximum dry unit weight that quartz-bentonite mixtures. On the contrary, the undrained shear strength of quartz-bentonite mixtures was greater than quartz-kaolinite mixtures.

Keywords

Quartz-clay mixtures Threshold fines content Fall cone test Plastic fines 

References

  1. Albrecht A, Benson C (2001) Effect of desiccation on compacted natural clays. J Geotech Geoenviron 127(1):67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayat M, Bayat E, Aminpour H, Salarpour A (2014) Shear strength and pore-water pressure characteristics of sandy soil mixed with plastic fine. Arab J Geosci 7(3):1049–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatz JA, Graham J, Chandler NA (2002) Influence of suction on the strength and stiffness of compacted sand bentonite. Can Geotech J 39(5):1005–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bray JD, Sancio RB (2006) Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 132(9):1165–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabalar AF, Hasan RA (2013) Compressional behaviour of various size/shape sand–clay mixtures with different pore fluids. Eng Geol 164:36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabalar AF, Mustafa WS (2015) Fall cone tests on clay–sand mixtures. Eng Geol 192:154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiu TF, Shackelford CD (1998) Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of compacted sand-kaolin mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(2):160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cubrinovski M, Ishihara K (2002) Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sands. Soils Found 42(6):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Magistris FS, Silvestri F, Vinale F (1998) Physical and mechanical properties of a compacted silty sand with low bentonite fraction. Can Geotech J 35(6):909–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng TW (2001) A linear log d log w model for the determination of consistency limits of soils. Can Geotech J 38(6):1335–1342Google Scholar
  11. Hansbo S (1957) A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall-cone test. In: Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute, 14. StockholmGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs W, Van Kesteren WGM, Winterwerp JC (2007) Permeability and consolidation of sediment mixtures as function of sand content and clay mineralogy. Int J Sediment Res 22(3):180–187Google Scholar
  13. Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Razmkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. J Seismol Earthq Eng JSEE 4(1):25Google Scholar
  14. Karim ME, Alam MJ (2014) Effect of non-plastic silt content on the liquefaction behavior of sand–silt mixture. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 65:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kochmanová N, Tanaka H (2011) Influence of the soil fabric on the mechanical properties of unsaturated clays. Soils Found 51(2):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolay PK, Ramesh KC (2016) Reduction of expansive index, swelling and compression behavior of kaolinite and bentonite clay with sand and class C fly ash. Geotech Geol Eng 34(1):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Komine H (2004) Simplified evaluation on hydraulic conductivities of sand–bentonite mixture backfill. Appl Clay Sci 26(1):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar GV, Wood DM (1999) Fall cone and compression tests on clay±gravel mixtures. Geotechnique 49(6):727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Likos WJ, Jaafar R (2014) Laboratory fall cone testing of unsaturated sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 140(8):04014043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Maio C, Santoli L, Schiavone P (2004) Volume change behaviour of clays: the influence of mineral composition, pore fluid composition and stress state. Mech Mater 36:435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray HH (2000) Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite, and palygorskite: a general overview. Appl Clay Sci 17(5):207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naeini SA, Jahanfar MA (2011) Effect of salt solution and plasticity index on undrain shear strength of clays. World Academy of Science. Eng Technol 49:982–986Google Scholar
  23. Park J, Santamarina JC (2017) Revised soil classification system for coarse-fine mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron 143(8):04017039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Purvana YM, Nikraj H, Jitsangiam P (2012) Experimental study of suction-monitored CBR test on sand-kaolin mixture. Int J Geomate 3(2 (SI.No.6)):419–422Google Scholar
  25. Sawangsuriya A, Edil TB, Bosscher PJ (2009) Modulus-suction-moisture relationship for compacted soils in postcompaction state. J Geotech Geoenviron 135(10):1390–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shayea A (2001) The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils. Eng Geol 62(4):319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simpson DC, Evans TM (2015) Behavioral thresholds in mixtures of sand and kaolinite clay. J Geotech Geoenviron 142(2):04015073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sridharan A, Gurtug Y (2004) Swelling behaviour of compacted fine-grained soils. Eng Geol 72(1):9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sridharan A, Prakash K (1999a) Mechanisms controlling the undrained shear strength behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 36(6):1030–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sridharan A, Prakash K (1999b) Influence of clay mineralogy and pore-medium chemistry on clay sediment formation. Can Geotech J 36(5):961–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stark TD, Choi H, McCone S (2005) Drained shear strength parameters for analysis of landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(5):575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sudjianto AT, Suryolelono KB, Mochtar IB (2011) The effect of variation index plasticity and activity in swelling vertical of expansive soil. International Journal of Engineering & Technology IJET-IJENS 11(6):117–123Google Scholar
  33. Thevanayagam S (2000) Liquefaction potential and undrained fragility of silty soils. 12WCEE 2000: 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Sunday 30 January - Friday 4 February 2000. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper HuttGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiwari B, Ajmera B (2011) A new correlation relating the shear strength of reconstituted soil to the proportions of clay minerals and plasticity characteristics. Appl Clay Sci 53(1):48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiwari B, Marui H (2003) Estimation of residual shear strength for bentonite-kaolin-Toyoura sand mixture. Journal of the Japan Landslide Society 40(2):124–133.  https://doi.org/10.3313/jls.40.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vallejo LE, Mawby R (2000) Porosity influence on the shear strength of granular material–clay mixtures. Eng Geol 58(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vanapalli SK (2009) Shear strength of unsaturated soils and its applications in geotechnical engineering practice. Unsaturated Soils – Buzzi, Fityus & Sheng (eds) © 2010. Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood DM (1985) Some fall cone tests. Geotechnique 35(1):64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wood DM (1990) Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  41. Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(3):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Geotechnical DivisionKilis 7 Aralik UniversityKilisTurkey

Personalised recommendations