Advertisement

An investigation of anthropogenic pollution in soil samples from residential areas in Erzincan city center and its vicinity by evaluating chemical factors

  • Paşa Yalçın
  • Erol Kam
  • Zeki Ünal Yümün
  • Dilek Kurt
Original Paper
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

To measure heavy metal pollution, 42 different soil samples were collected and analyzed from the center, cities, and villages of Erzincan. Average element concentrations in the soil samples in micrograms per gram were as follows: Cadmium (Cd, 6.1), Cobalt (Co, 52.2), Chromium (Cr, 739.6), Copper (Cu, 51.3), Nickel (Ni, 638.4), Lead (Pb, 14.2), and Zinc(Zn, 85.7), and these results were incompatible with natural background values. Heavy metal concentrations were at high levels, especially in agricultural regions and regions with mineral deposits. The results were compared to the allowable levels in soil dictated by pollution regulations in Turkey and some European countries. Krige (1962) method was used to evaluate the distribution of concentrations of heavy metals. Various methods such as Reverse Distance Weighted Interpolation Method (IDW), Local Polynomial, Radial-Based Function, and Kriging were used in preparing density maps. In the maps obtained, critical values for each heavy metal are defined. In addition, these critical values were compared with Krauskopf (1979) values. In this comparison, the values obtained in the samples showed ultramafic rocks in Erzincan region.

Keywords

Heavy metals Pollution Background Soil samples Erzincan 

References

  1. Abtew W, Obeysekera J, Shih G (1993) Spatial analysis for monthly rainfall in South Florida. Water Resour Bull 29:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banat KM, Howari FM, Al-Hamad AA (2005) Heavy metals in urban soils of central Jordan: should we worry about their environmental risks? Environ Res 97:258–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Başkan O (2004) Geostatistical application of engineering and physical property relations of gölbaşi local soils. PHD thesis. A. Ü. Institute of Science and Technology. Ankara (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  4. Comission of the Europen Communities (2006) Report from the commission to the council and the European parliament on the implementation of community waste legislation, Directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Dechang H, Xiaoke Z, Vijay Vikram Singh T, Qi L, Dazhong W, Wenju L (2009) Effects of heavy metal pollution of highway origin on soil nematode guilds in North Shenyang, China. J Environ Sci 21:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) GSLIB geostatistical software library and user's guide. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Düner M (2016) Erzincan province mine and energy resources, 33 pp. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  8. Fishel FM (2014) Pesticide toxicity profile: copper-based pesticides. University of Florida (p5)Google Scholar
  9. Holmgren GGS, Meye MW, Chaney RL, Daniels RB (1993) Cadmium, lead, zinc, copper, and nickel in agricultural soil of the United States of America. J Environ Qual 22:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imperato M, Adamo P, Naimo D, Arienzo M, Stanzione D, Violante P (2003) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy). Environ Pollut 124:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. İnal C, Turgut B, Yiğit CÖ (2002) Comparison of interpolation methods used in determination of geoid undulations in local areas. Selcuk University 30th year symposium in geodesy and photogrammetry engineering teaching. Konya. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  12. Koca H, Karadeniz V (2014) The activities of housing development administration (Toki) in Erzincan plain and the effects of them on urbanization. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 19(31):101–128. (In Turkish)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krauskopf KB (1979) Introduction to geochemistry. In: International series in the earth and planetary sciences. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo 617 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Krauskopf KB (1985) Introduction to geochemistry. In: McGraw-Hill international series in the earth and planetary sciences, vol 617, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  15. Krige D.G. (1962) Effective pay limits for selective mining. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 62:345–363Google Scholar
  16. Madrid L, Diaz-Barrientos E, Madrid F (2002) Distribution of heavy metal contents of urban soils in parks of Seville. Chemosphere 49:1301–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mineral Research and Exploration (2010) Mineral and energy resources of Erzincan province. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  18. Official Gazette: 31.05.2005 date, 25831 noGoogle Scholar
  19. Pehlivan H (2017) Investıgatıon of heavy metal pollution in sediments of southern Marmara Sea (the Kocasu Delta), Department of Environmental Engineering Master Degree, Master's Thesis (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  20. Santos-Francés F, Martínez-Graña AM, Alonso Rojo P, García Sánchez A (2017) Geochemical background and baseline values determination and spatial distribution of heavy metal pollution in soils of the Andes Mountain Range (Cajamarca-Huancavelica, Peru). Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(8):859.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Şener, Ş and Şener, E. (2015) Assessment of heavy metal distribution and contamination in the Kovada Lake (Isparta) bottom sediments. Süleyman Demirel University Journal Of Natural And Applied Science. 19(2):86–96. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  22. Setia RC, Kaur N, Setia N, Nayyar H (2008) Heavy metal toxicity in plants and phytoremediation. In: Crop improvement: strategies and applications, pp 206–218Google Scholar
  23. Sun Y, Zhou O, Xie X, Liu R (2010) Spatial, sources and risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of urban soils in typical regions of Shenyang, China. J Hazard Mater 174:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tóth G, Hermann T, Da Silva M, Montanarella L (2016) Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environ Int 88:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trangmar BB, Yost RJ, Wehara G (1985) Application of geostatistic to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv Agron 38:65–91Google Scholar
  26. Turekian KK, Wedepohl KH (1961) Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth’s crust. Geol Soc Am Bull 72:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei B, Yang L (2010) A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J 94:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wuana R.A., Okieimen F.E. (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated Soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Ecology, 2011:20.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/402647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yümün, Z.Ü. (2016) The effects of heavy metal concentrations in the Çanakkale strait (Turkey): morphological differences in the Holocene foraminiferal assemblages. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, 2016 1(2):77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yümün ZÜ (2017) The effect of heavy metal pollution on foraminifera in the Western Marmara Sea (Turkey). J Afr Earth Sci 129:346–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yümün and Önce (2017) Monitoring heavy metal pollution in foraminifera from the gulf of Edremit (Northeaster Aegean Sea) between Izmir, Balikesir and Çanakkale (Turkey). J Afr Earth Sci 130:110–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science Education, Faculty of EducationErzincan UniversityErzincanTurkey
  2. 2.Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and SciencesYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Environmental Engineering Department, Corlu Engineering FacultyNamik Kemal UniversityTekirdagTurkey
  4. 4.Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and SciencesMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations