Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 11:559 | Cite as

Potential nitrogen fixation changes under different land uses as influenced by seasons and biochar amendments

  • Agota Horel
  • Imre Potyó
  • Tibor Szili-Kovács
  • Sándor Molnár
S. I. BIOCHAR
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Implications of Biochar Application to Soil Environment under Arid Conditions

Abstract

Soil nutrient dynamics, potential biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) changes, and their relations were studied using four land use types. Further, we investigated BNF changes in the presence of biochar in soils. Soil samples were collected from arable, vineyard, grassland, and forest soils during four seasons, and analyzed for abiotic contents of total nitrogen, NH4+-N, NO3-N, ammonium lactate (AL)-soluble K2O, P2O5, and soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations. Potential N2 fixation was measured as ethylene (C2H4) production from acetylene (C2H2) reduction (ARA). The study focused on the changes in ARA when different types of biochars (T600, T650, and T700) were applied to soil samples in different amounts (0, 0.5, 2.5, and 5.0% wt wt−1) under laboratory conditions. We found strong correlations between soil chemical parameters and ARA values, especially in the case of soil pH, total N, SOC, and P2O5 contents. In the case of arable soil, the ARA measurements were up to 227 times higher compared to grassland and forest samples. Biochar application affected N2-fixing microbial responses among land use types, most notably decreases in arable lands and forest soils. We found that a high amount of biochar added to the soils can greatly suppress N2-fixing activities. Our results highlight the strong relationship between soil nutrient changes and the intensity of anthropogenic influence.

Keywords

Arable BNF ARA Forest Grassland Vineyard 

Notes

Funding information

This material is based upon work supported by the Hungarian National Research Fund (OTKA/NKFI) project OTKA PD-116157. This paper was also supported by the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

References

  1. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belnap J (2003) The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts. Front Ecol Environ 1:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0181:TWAYFD]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezdicek DF, Kennedy AC (1998) Microorganisms in action. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackmer AM, Bremner JM (1978) Inhibitory effect of nitrate on reduction of N2O to N2 by soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 10:187–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(78)90095-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cusack DF, Silver W, McDowell WH (2009) Biological nitrogen fixation in two tropical forests: ecosystem-level patterns and effects of nitrogen fertilization. Ecosystems 12:1299–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9290-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLuca TH, MacKenzie MD, Gundale MJ (2009) Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 251–270Google Scholar
  7. Fageria VD (2001) Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr 24:1269–1290.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-100106981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agron J 102:623–633.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halbleib CM, Ludden PW (2000) Regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. J Nutr 130:1081–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horel A, Bernard R, Mortazavi B (2014) Impact of crude oil exposure on nitrogen cycling in a previously impacted Juncus roemerianus salt marsh in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:6982–6993.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2599-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horel Á, Tóth E, Gelybó G, Dencső M, Potyó I (2018) Soil CO2 and N2O emission drivers in a vineyard (Vitis vinifera) under different soil management systems and amendments. Sustainability 10:1811.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanwar RS, Baker JL, Baker DG (1988) Tillage and split N-fertilization effects on subsurface drainage water quality and crop yields. Transactions of the ASAE 31:0453–0461.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Limmer C, Drake HL (1996) Non-symbiotic N2-fixation in acidic and pH-neutral forest soils: aerobic and anaerobic differentials. Soil Biol Biochem 28:177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00118-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maharning AR, Mills AAS, Adl SM (2009) Soil community changes during secondary succession to naturalized grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 41:137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masson-Boivin C, Giraud E, Perret X, Batut J (2009) Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes? Trends Microbiol 17:458–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2009.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mia S, van Groenigen JW, van de Voorde TFJ, Orama NJ, Bezemer TM, Mommer L, Jeffery S (2014) Biochar application rate affects biological nitrogen fixation in red clover conditional on potassium availability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mijangos I, Pérez R, Albizu I, Garbisu C (2006) Effects of fertilization and tillage on soil biological parameters. Enzym Microb Technol 40:100–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulongoy K (1995) Technical paper 2: biological nitrogen fixation. In: Tripathl BR, Psychas PJ (eds) Source book for alley farming research. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, p. 150-156. http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ilri/x5546e/x5546e05.htm#2.4%20factors%20limiting%20biological%20nitrogen%20fixation. Accessed 30 July 2018
  19. Ouyang L, Wang F, Tang J, Yu L, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochar amendment on soil aggregates and hydraulic properties. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:991–1002Google Scholar
  20. Quilliam RS, DeLuca TH, Jones DL (2013) Biochar application reduces nodulation but increases nitrogenase activity in clover. Plant Soil 366:83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1411-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reddy KR, Patrick WH, Broadbent FE (1984) Nitrogen transformations and loss in flooded soils and sediments. CRC Crit Rev Environ Control 13:273–309.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643388409381709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rillig MC, Wagner M, Salem M, Antunes PM, George C, Ramke H-G, Titirici M-M, Antonietti M (2010) Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl Soil Ecol 45:238–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:699–708.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roper MM, Smith NA (1991) Straw decomposition and nitrogenase activity (C2H2 reduction) by free-living microorganisms from soil: effects of pH and clay content. Soil Biol Biochem 23:275–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(91)90064-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111:743–767.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schiewer S, Horel A (2017) Biodiesel addition influences biodegradation rates of fresh and artificially weathered diesel fuel in Alaskan sand. J Cold Reg Eng 31:04017012.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Surda P, Lichner L, Nagy V, Kollar J, Iovino M, Horel A (2015) Effects of vegetation at different succession stages on soil properties and water flow in sandy soil. Biologia 70:1474–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thies JE, Rillig M (2009) Characteristics of biochar: biological properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 85–105Google Scholar
  30. Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Fujimaki H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use Manag 27:205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00340.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:HAOTGN]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  32. Welsh DT, Bourgués S, de Wit R, Herbert RA (1996) Seasonal variations in nitrogen-fixation (acetylene reduction) and sulphate-reduction rates in the rhizosphere of Zostera noltii: nitrogen fixation by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Mar Biol 125:619–628.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ye R, Wright AL, Inglett K, Wang Y, Ogram AV, Reddy KR (2009) Land-use effects on soil nutrient cycling and microbial community dynamics in the Everglades agricultural area, Florida. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 40:2725–2742.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620903173772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agota Horel
    • 1
  • Imre Potyó
    • 1
  • Tibor Szili-Kovács
    • 1
  • Sándor Molnár
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for Agricultural ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations