Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 11:542 | Cite as

Factors influencing hydrogen yield in water radiolysis and implications for hydrocarbon generation: a review

  • Wenqing Wang
  • Chiyang Liu
  • Wenhui Liu
  • Dongdong Zhang
Review Paper

Abstract

Hydrocarbon generation is a process of adding H and removing S, N, and other heteroatoms. Traditional theories of hydrocarbon generation and the evaluation of oil and gas reservoirs both neglect consideration of the influence of exogenous H2. To probe the possibility that exogenous H2 from water radiolysis influences hydrocarbon generation by source rocks, data from water radiolysis experiments are collected, and factors affecting H2 yield are summarized. The results indicate that the hydrogen yield of heavy ion (e.g., 4He ion) radiolysis is higher than that of proton radiolysis, while electron radiolysis and γ rays have the lowest H2 yields. The addition of solids, smaller pore size, larger specific surface area, neutral, and reductive environments and several short reduplicative irradiation steps favor increasing H2 yield. In the source rocks of the Chang 7 member in the Ordos Basin, the high content of uranium provided a large amount of radiant energy to the formation water during hydrocarbon generation. Given the abundant clay minerals, small pore size, and reducing environment of the source rocks, there is a significant possibility that the abundant uranium in the Chang 7 member radiated formation water producing H2 which is a promising source of exogenous H2 for hydrocarbon generation.

Keywords

Water radiolysis Hydrogen yield Exogenous H2 Hydrocarbon generation Uranium-rich source rocks Ordos Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. X.P. Ouyang for helpful suggestions and Dr. F. Chupin for technical assistance.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers 41330315 and 41402093.

References

  1. Brey RR, Rodriguez R, Harmon J, Winston P (2001) Investigation of irradiated soil byproducts. Waste Manag 21:581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cecal A, Hauta O, Macovei A, Popovici E, Rusu I, Puica NM (2008) Hydrogen yield from water radiolysis in the presence of some pillared clays. Rev Roum Chim 53:875–880Google Scholar
  3. Chapelle FH, O'Neill K, Bradley PM, Methe BA, Ciufo SA, Knobel LL, Lovley DR (2002) A hydrogen-based subsurface microbial community dominated by methanogens. Nature 415:312–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chupin F, Dannoux-Papin A, Ravache YN (2017) Water content and porosity effect on hydrogen radiolytic yields of geopolymers. J Nucl Mater 494:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coveney RM, Goebel ED, Zeller EJ, Dreschhoff GAM, Angino EE (1987) Serpentinization and the origin of hydrogen gas in Kansas. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 71:39–48Google Scholar
  6. Cowan RL (1996) Water chemistry of nuclear reactor systems. British Nuclear Energy Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dincer I (2012) Green methods for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:1954–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliot AJ, McCracken DR, Buxton GV, Wood ND (1990) Estimation of rate constant for near-diffusioncontrolled reactions in water at high temperature. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 86:1539–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eriksen TE, Christensen H, Bjergbakke E (1987) Hydrogen production in alpha-irradiated bentonite. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 116:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng X, Ao W, Tang X (2017) Characteristics and main controlling factors of the formation of pores in continental shale gas reservoirs: a case study of Chang 7 member in Ordos Basin. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition) [online], Available from: http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/22.1343.P.20170105.1631.002.html
  11. Fourdrin C, Aarrachi H, Latrille C, Esnouf S, Bergaya F, Le CS (2013) Water radiolysis in exchanged-montmorillonites: the H2 production mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 47:9530–9537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frances L, Grivet M, Renault JP, Groetz JE, Ducret D (2015) Hydrogen radiolytic release from zeolite 4A/water systems under γ irradiations. Radiat Phys Chem 110:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gluckauf E, Paneth FA (1946) The helium content of atmospheric air. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 185:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu QY, Kim DY, Liu J, Meng Y, Yang LX, Zhang DZ, Mao WL, Mao HK (2017) Dehydrogenation of goethite in Earth’s deep lower mantle. PNAS 114:1498–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt JM (1996) Petroleum geochemistry and geology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Kita I, Matsuo S, Wakita H (1982) H2 generation by reaction between H2O and crushed rock: an experimental study on H2 degassing from the active fault zone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 87:10789–10795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le CS, Rotureau P, Brunet F, Charpentier T, Blain G, Renault JP, Mialocq J-C (2005) Radiolysis of confined water: hydrogen production at a high dose rate. Chemphyschem 6:2585–2596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu CY, Wu BL (2016) Mineralization mechanism, spatial enrichment law of oil/gas coal and uranium coexisting in the same basin. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu XT (2001) Nuclear physics. Atomic Energy Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  20. Maeda Y, Kawana Y, Kawamura Y, Hayami S, Sugihara S, Okay T (2005) Hydrogen gas evolution from water included in a silica gel cavity and on metal oxides with γ-ray irradiation. JNucl Radiochem Sci 6:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mao HK, Hu QY, Yang LX, Liu J, Kim DY, Meng Y, Zhang L, Prakapenka VB,Yang W, Mao WL (2017) When water meets iron at Earth’s core-mantle boundary. Nat Sci Rev 0: 1–9Google Scholar
  22. Mapiour M, Sundaramurthy V, Dalai AK, Adjaye J (2010) Effects of the operating variables on hydrotreating of heavy gas oil: experimental, modeling, and kinetic studies. Fuel 89:2536–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Musat RM, Cook AR, Renault JP, Crowell RA (2012) Nanosecond pulse radiolysis of nanoconfined water. J Phys Chem 116:13104–13110Google Scholar
  24. Nakashima M, Masaki NM (1996) Radiolytic hydrogen gas formation from water adsorbed on type Y zeolites. Radiat Phys Chem 47:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakashima M, Tachikawa E (1987) Radiolytic gas production from tritiated water adsorbed on molecular sieve 5A. J Nucl Sci Technol 24:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Negron-Mendoza A, Ramos-Bernal S (1998) Radiolysis of carboxylic acids adsorbed in clay minerals. Radiat Phys Chem 52:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ortiz AL, Zaragoza MJM, Collins-Martínez V (2016) Hydrogen production research in Mexico: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:23363–23379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pastina B, LaVerne J (2001) Effect of molecular hydrogen on hydrogen peroxide in water radiolysis. J Phys Chem A 105:9316–9322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pastina B, LaVerne JA, Pimblott SM (1999) Dependence of molecular hydrogen formation in water on scavengers of the precursor to the hydrated electron. J Phys Chem A 103:5841–5846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pusch R, Karnland O (1996) Physico/chemical stability of smectite clays. Eng Geol 41:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pusch R, Kasbohm J, Thao HTM (2010) Chemical stability of montmorillonite buffer clay under repository-like conditions-a synthesis of relevant experimental data. Appl Clay Sci 47:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qiu XW(2011) Characteristics and dynamic settings of Yanchang period hydrocarbon-rich depression in Ordos Basin, China. Dissertation, Northwest UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahim I, Nomura S, Mukasa S, Toyota H (2015) Decomposition of methane hydrate for hydrogen production using microwave and radio frequency in-liquid plasma methods. Appl Therm Eng 90:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rotureau P, Renault JP, Lebeau B, Patarin J, Mialocq JC (2005) Radiolysis of confined water: molecular hydrogen formation. Chemphyschem 6:1316–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwarz HA, Losee JP, Allen AO (1954) Hydrogen yields in the radiolysis of aqueous solutions1. J Am Chem Soc 76:4693–4694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seewald JS (2003) Organic-inorganic interaction in petroleum-producing sedimentary basins. Nature 426:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugisaki R, Sugiura T (1986) Gas anomalies at three mineral springs and a fumarole before an inland earthquake, Central Japan. J Geophys Res 91:12296–12304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan CQ, Liu CY, Zhao JL, Zhang RR (2007) The radioactive abnormality characteristics of typical regions in Ordos Basin and its geological implications. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 60:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tissot BP, Welte DH (1978) Petroleum formation and occurrence-a new approach to oil and gas exploration. Springer Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wakita H, Nakamura Y, Kita I, Fujii N, Notsu K (1980) Hydrogen release: new indicator of fault activity. Science 210:188–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang MM, Li H, Qiu YB (2015) Coal-type uranium metallogenic analysis in Honghaigou area, Ili Basin, Xinjiang. Coal Geology China 27:12–16Google Scholar
  42. Wang XF, Liu WH, Xu YC, Zheng JJ, Zhang DW (2006) Thermal simulation experimental study on the effect of water on the formation of gaseous hydrocarbons in organic matters. Prog Nat Sci 16:1275–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wasselin-Trupin V, Baldacchino G, Bouffard S, Hickel B (2002) Hydrogen peroxide yields in water radiolysis by high-energy ion beams at constant let. Radiat Phys Chem 65:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamamoto TA, Seino S, Katsura M, Okitsu K, Oshima R, Nagata Y (1999) Hydrogen gas evolution from alumina nanoparticles dispersed in water irradiated with γ-ray. Nanostruct Mater 12:1045–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang H, Zhang W, Wu K, Li S, Peng P, Qin Y (2010) Uranium enrichment in lacustrine oil source rocks of the Chang 7 member of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China. J Asian Earth Sci 39:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang D, Gao J (1996) The effect of co-hydrogenation of petroleum heavy oil and coal on heavy oil properties. Petrochem Technol 25:466–470Google Scholar
  47. Zhang JD, Li ZY, Xu GZ, Peng YB, Wang G, Li HY, Li HY (2015) Significant progress and breakthrough in uranium exploration in China-examples of newly discovered and proven uranium deposits since the new century. Geological Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang K, Liu T, Dai L, Nie H (2012) Study on the variations of hydrotreating reactions for recycal oil. Pet Process Petrochem 43:5–9Google Scholar
  49. Zhang WZ, Yang H, Yang YH, Kong QF, Wu K (2008) Petrology and element geochemistry and development environment of Yanchang Formation Chang-7 high quality source rocks in Ordos Basin. Geochimica 37:59–64Google Scholar
  50. Zhao FM (2009) A review on geology study of carbonaceous-siliceous-pelitic rock type uranium deposit in China and the strategy for its development. Uranium Geology 25:91–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenqing Wang
    • 1
  • Chiyang Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wenhui Liu
    • 1
  • Dongdong Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of GeologyNorthwest UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Northwest UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations