Advertisement

Spatio-temporal analysis of temperature variability, trend, and magnitude in the Hindu Kush region using Monte Carlo and Sen’s slope approaches

  • Muhammad Dawood
  • Atta-ur Rahman
  • Sami Ullah
  • Ghani Rahman
  • Kamran Azam
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study explores the spatial and temporal deviations in temperature using Monte Carlo (MC) and Sen’s slope (SS) approaches in the Hindu Kush (HK) region. Climate change holds sturdy association against the temperature trend that has generated adverse impacts in the form of floods. In this attempt, for trend analysis, temperature has been selected as a meteorological parameter. This study mainly focuses on exploring the tendency in average temperature with respect to time and the consequential flood recurrences in the region. For the current study, data regarding temperature were typically collected from Pakistan Meteorological Department. In the study region, there are a total of seven meteorological station falls namely Dir, Chitral, Drosh, Saidu, Malam Jabba, Kalam, and Timergara. The temperature time series data was calculated and analyzed using MC and SS approaches for trend detection in order to demonstrate the kind of fluctuation in the Hindu Kush region. The resultant analysis further revealed that in the meteorological station of Dir, a more significant positive trend (α = 0.0001) was found in mean monthly maximum, minimum, and monthly normal temperature. Likewise, at Drosh, a positive trend is detected in mean monthly maximum (α = 0.04), monthly minimum (α = 0.003), and monthly average (α = 0.0005). Moreover, at Saidu met station, there is also a trend detected in temperature sub-variables such as monthly maximum (α = 0.0001) and monthly minimum (α = 0.001). In addition to these, at Kalam, there is a temperature trend noted for monthly minimum (α = 0.01) and monthly average (α = 0.02). Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that there is no trend detected in the remaining stations, i.e., Chitral, Malam Jabba, Drosh, and Timergara. The overall analysis discovered that there is a sturdy relationship between climate change phenomenon and temperature variability. After using SS test to the temperature data of mean monthly maximum (TMMMax), the results explored that Kalam station grips the highest magnitude, i.e., Q = 0.76; however, Timergara shows the lowermost, i.e., Q = − 0.34. For the monthly minimum temperature (TMMMin), at Kalam again, the highest value (Q = 0.005) was detected; however, other stations revealed a negative trend, except Drosh which express no change in terms of magnitude. Similarly, in terms of monthly normal temperature (TMNor), Timergara station (Q = − 0.4) verified a negative trend magnitude and Malam Jabba station again trendless. Among all, the met station of Malam Jabba which holds an altitude of 2591 m is a hilly station just followed by Kalam having 2103 m height; however, Dir holds 1375 m height and the rest of the met stations show low elevation. The main reason for the temperature difference is the altitude of the study region.

Keywords

Temperature Magnitude Trend Monte Carlo simulation model Sen’s slope estimator test 

References

  1. Beyene T, Lettenmaier D, Kabat P (2010) Hydrologic impacts of climate change on the Nile River Basin: implications of the 2007 IPCC scenarios. Climate Change 100(3):433–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen ZS, Chen YN, Li WH (2012) Response of runoff to change of atmospheric 0°C level height in summer in arid region of Northwest China. Science China 55:1533–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dichter, D. (1967). The north-west frontier of West Pakistan: a study in regional geography: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Douglas EM, Vogel RM, Kroll CN (2000) Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol 240:90–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El-Nesr MN, Abu-Zreig MM, Alazba AA (2010) Temperature trends and distribution in the Arabian Peninsula. Am J Environ Sci 6(2):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fishman GS (1999) Monte carlo: concepts, algorithms, and applications. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Folland CK, Salinger MJ (1996) Surface temperature trends and variations in New Zealand and the surrounding oceans, 1871–1993. Int J Climatol 15:1195–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleick PH (1987) Regional hydrologic consequences of increases in atmospheric CO2 and other trace gases. Climate Change 10:173–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gleick PH (1986) Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic impacts of global climatic changes. J Hydrol 88(1–2):97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hailemariam K (1999) Impact of climate change on the water resources of Awash River Basin, Ethiopia. Clim Res 12:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC. (2013). IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) on climate change 2013. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.UtzS8NKmrIU
  12. Kay AL, Rudd AC, Davies HN, Kendon EJ, Jones RG (2015) Use of very high resolution climate model data for hydrological modelling: baseline performance and future flood changes. Clim Chang 133(2):193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreft S, Eckstein D (2013) Briefing paper, Global Climate Risk Index 2014: who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2012 and 1993 to 2012. Germanwatch, Bonn. www.germanwatch.org/en/cri Google Scholar
  14. Modarres R, Silva VPR (2007) Rainfall trends in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. J Arid Environ 70:344–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Obeysekera J, Irizarry M, Park J, Barnes J, Dessalegne T (2011) Climate change and its implications for water resources management in South Florida. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(4):495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ozkul S (2009) Assessment of climate change effects in Aegean river basins: the case of Gediz and Buyuk Menderes Basins. Climate Change 97:253–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parker DE, Folland CK, Jackson M (1995) Marine surface temperature: observed variations and data requirements. Clim Change 31(2–4):559–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pohl S, Marsh P, Bonsal BR (2007) Modeling the impact of climate change on runoff and annual water balance of an Arctic Headwater Basin. ARCTIC 60(2):173–186Google Scholar
  19. Rahman A, Shaw R (2014) Floods in the Hindu Kush region: causes and socio-economic aspects. In: Shaw R, Nibanupudi HK (eds) Mountain Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo, pp 33–52Google Scholar
  20. Rahman A, Shaw R (2015) Disaster and climate change education in Pakistan. In: Rahman A, Khan AN, Shaw R (eds) Disaster Risk Reduction Approaches in Pakistan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 315–336Google Scholar
  21. Rahman G, Rahman A, Samiullah DM (2018) Spatial and temporal variation of rainfall and drought in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan during 1971–2015. Arab J Geosci 11(3):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rahman A, Khan AN (2011) Analysis of flood causes and associated socio-economic damages in the Hindu Kush region. Natural Hazard 59(3):1239–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rahman A, Khan AN (2013) Analysis of 2010-flood causes, and magnitude in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 66(2):887–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahoo GB, Schladow SG, Reuter JE, Coats R (2011) Effects of climate change on thermal properties of lakes and reservoirs, and possible implications. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(4):445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sen’s PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepherd A, Gill KM, Rood S, B. (2010) Climate change and future flows of Rocky Mountain Rivers: converging forecats from empirical trend projection and downscaled global circulation modelling. Hydrol Process 24(26):3864–3877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shinohara Y, Kumagai T o, Otsuki K, Kume A, Wada N (2009) Impact of climate change on runoff from a mid-latitude mountainous catchment in Central Japan. Hydrol Process 23(10):1418–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tabari H, Marofi S (2011) Changes of pan evaporation in the west of Iran. Water Resour Manag 25(1):97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vinnikov Ya K, Ya Grossman P, Lugine KM (1990) Empirical data on contemporary global climate change (temperature and precipitation). J Clim 3:666–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yan J, Changming L, Hongxing Z, Xuyong L, Xiang W (2010) Responses of river runoff to climate change based on nonlinear mixed regression model in Chaohe River Basin of Hebei Province, China. China Geographical Science 20(2):152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yunling H, Yiping Z (2005) Climate change from 1960 to 2000 in the Lancang River Valley, China. Mt Res Dev 25(4):341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang S, Hua D, Meng X, Zhang Y (2011) Climate change and its driving effect on the runoff in the Three-River Headwater• region. J Geogr Sci 21(6):963–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zheng X, Basker RE, Thomson CS (1997) Trend detection in regional mean temperature series: maximum, minimum, diurnal range, and SST. J Clim 10:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Dawood
    • 1
  • Atta-ur Rahman
    • 1
  • Sami Ullah
    • 1
  • Ghani Rahman
    • 2
  • Kamran Azam
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of GujratGujratPakistan
  3. 3.National Defence University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations