Advertisement

Effects of drilling fluids on the strength properties of clay-bearing rocks

  • Hasan Karakul
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Certain drilling problems are frequently observed during different types of drilling (e.g. geothermal, oil, geotechnical). In order to maintain the stability of boreholes, analysis of the essential parameters affecting their stability, including induced post-drilling stresses, the geomechanical properties of the rocks encountered during drilling and the type of drilling fluid used, should be considered. Well pressure, which is a function of the density of the drilling fluid, should be kept at a level that will not create shear- or tensile-type failure around the borehole walls; however, the mechanical properties of rocks are not constant and can be varied due to the interaction between drilling fluid and rock materials especially for clay-bearing rocks. Despite being aware of these factors, to date, no comprehensive study has been conducted on these issues. In order to overcome these shortcomings, the variations in mechanical properties of two clay-bearing sediments, which were saturated with different types of drilling fluids that are widely used in drilling practices, were investigated. By considering the obtained geomechanical properties, the effect of drilling fluids was compared and evaluated in terms of degradation of mechanical properties. As the occurrence of excess pore pressures that can develop under undrained conditions around a borehole is essential to borehole stability, the distribution of excess pore pressures and plastic deformations was also investigated by a finite element-based borehole simulation under drained and undrained conditions. By considering the results of experimental and numerical studies, some recommendations were presented for understanding wellbore stability.

Keywords

Drilling fluid Wellbore instability Plastic deformation Clay-bearing rocks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Assistant Professor Ali Ettehadi and Osman Ünal (Research assistant) for their kind help with the viscosity measurements of the drilling fluids, and to Naci Sertuğ Şenol (Graduate student) for his help in rock sampling studies.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit (Project No. 2016-GAP-MÜMF-0004) of İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University.

References

  1. Aadnoy BS (1996) Modern well design. A. A. Balkema Publishers, NetherlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki T, Tan CP, Bamford WE (1993) Effects of deformation and strength anisotropy on borehole failures in saturated shales. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(7):1031–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. API Specification 13A (2010) Specifications for drilling fluid materials, 18th edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 130Google Scholar
  4. Chen G, Chenevert MA, Sharma MM, Yu M (2003) A study of wellbore stability in shales including poroelastic, chemical, and thermal effects. J Pet Sci Eng 38:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dönmez M, Akçay AA, Türkecan A (2014) İzmir-K 18 Paftası, 1:100.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, No:213, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyke CG, Dobereiner L (1991) Evaluating the strength and deformability of sandstones. Q J Eng Geol 24:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ergüler ZA, Ulusay R (2009) Water-induced variations in mechanical properties of clay-bearing rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(2):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ewy RT, Bovberg CA, Stankovich RJ (2008) Shale triaxial strength alteration due to brine exposure. The 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS), 29 June-2 July, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerçek, H. (2007). Poisson’s ratio values for rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Grillet AM, Wyatt NB, Gloe LM (2012) Polymer gel rheology and adhesion. In: De Vicente J (ed) Rheology, IntechOpen.  https://doi.org/10.5772/2065 Google Scholar
  12. Gündoğdu MN (1982) Geological, mineralogical and geochemical investigatoin of the Neogene aged Bigadic sedimentary basin. PhD Thesis, Geological Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins AB (1998) Aspects of rock strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He S, Liang L, Zeng Y, Ding Y, Lin Y, Liu X (2016) The influence of water-based drilling fluid on mechanical property of shale and the wellbore stability. Petroleum 2(1):61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974-2006. Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group. ISRM, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  16. Javalagi S and Singireddy SR (2012) Hydraulic fluid properties and its influence on system performance. Master’s degree project. Division of fluid and mechatronic systems department of management and engineering. LIU-IEI-TEK-A--12/01284—SEGoogle Scholar
  17. Karakul H, Ulusay R (2013) Empirical correlations for predicting strength properties of rocks from P-wave velocity under different degrees of saturation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(5):981–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lashkaripour GR (2002) Predicting mechanical properties of mudrock from index parameters. Bull Eng Geol Environ 61:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu X, Zeng W, Liang L, Xiong J (2016) Experimental study on hydration damage mechanism of shale from the Longmaxi formation in southern Sichuan Basin, China. Petroleum 2:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu J, Feng Q, Wang Y, Bai Y, Wei J, Song Z (2017) The effect of polymer-fiber stabilization on the unconfined compressive strength and shear strength of sand. Adv Mater Sci Eng Article ID 2370763, 9 pagesGoogle Scholar
  21. Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mkpoikana R, Dosunmu A, Eme C (2015) Prevention of shale instability by optimizing drilling fluid performance. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, 4-6 August, Lagos, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  23. Nmebgu CGJ, Ohazurulike LV (2014) Wellbore instability in oil well drilling: a review. Int J Eng Res Dev 10(5):11–20Google Scholar
  24. Pasic B, Medimurec NG, Matanovic D (2007) Wellbore instability: causes and consequences. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik 19:87–98Google Scholar
  25. Plaxis (2016) PLAXIS material models manual. Plaxis, DelftGoogle Scholar
  26. Shakib JT, Jalalifar H, Akhgarian E (2013) Wellbore stability in shale formation using analytical and numerical simulation. J Chem Petrol Eng 47(1):51–60Google Scholar
  27. Shilko EV, Dimaki AV, Psakhie SG (2018) Strength of shear bands in fluidsaturated rocks: a nonlinear effect of competition between dilation and fluid flow. Sci Rep 8:1428.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19843-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Geotechnique 4:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torok A, Vasarhelyi B (2010) The influence of fabric and water content on selected rock mechanical parameters of travertine, examples from Hungary. Eng Geol 115:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vasarhelyi B (2005) Statistical analysis of the influence of water content on the strength of the Miocene limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed AS (2014) Hyperbolic rheological model with shear stress limit for acrylamide polymer modified bentonite drilling muds. J Pet Sci Eng 122:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wong LNY, Maruvanchery V, Liu G (2016) Water effects on rock strength and stiffness degradation. Acta Geotech 11(4):713–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan C, Deng J, Yu B (2013) Wellbore stability in oil and gas drilling with chemical-mechanical coupling. Sci World J 2013:720271Google Scholar
  34. Yılmaz I (2010) Influence of water content on the strength and deformability of gypsum. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(2):342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu B, Yan C, Nie Z (2013) Chemical effect on wellbore instability of Nahr Umr shale. Sci World J 2013:931034Google Scholar
  36. Zhang J (2017) Effects of porosity and permeability on invasion depth during drilling mud-filtrate invading into a reservoir dynamically. Adv Comput Sci Res 76:203–206Google Scholar
  37. Zosel A (1985) Adhesion and tack of polymers: influence of mechanical properties and surface tensions. Colloid Polym Sci 263:541–553 ISSN 0303-402XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineeringİzmir Kâtip Çelebi UniversityİzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations