Effects of drilling fluids on the strength properties of clay-bearing rocks
- 48 Downloads
Certain drilling problems are frequently observed during different types of drilling (e.g. geothermal, oil, geotechnical). In order to maintain the stability of boreholes, analysis of the essential parameters affecting their stability, including induced post-drilling stresses, the geomechanical properties of the rocks encountered during drilling and the type of drilling fluid used, should be considered. Well pressure, which is a function of the density of the drilling fluid, should be kept at a level that will not create shear- or tensile-type failure around the borehole walls; however, the mechanical properties of rocks are not constant and can be varied due to the interaction between drilling fluid and rock materials especially for clay-bearing rocks. Despite being aware of these factors, to date, no comprehensive study has been conducted on these issues. In order to overcome these shortcomings, the variations in mechanical properties of two clay-bearing sediments, which were saturated with different types of drilling fluids that are widely used in drilling practices, were investigated. By considering the obtained geomechanical properties, the effect of drilling fluids was compared and evaluated in terms of degradation of mechanical properties. As the occurrence of excess pore pressures that can develop under undrained conditions around a borehole is essential to borehole stability, the distribution of excess pore pressures and plastic deformations was also investigated by a finite element-based borehole simulation under drained and undrained conditions. By considering the results of experimental and numerical studies, some recommendations were presented for understanding wellbore stability.
KeywordsDrilling fluid Wellbore instability Plastic deformation Clay-bearing rocks
The author is grateful to Assistant Professor Ali Ettehadi and Osman Ünal (Research assistant) for their kind help with the viscosity measurements of the drilling fluids, and to Naci Sertuğ Şenol (Graduate student) for his help in rock sampling studies.
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit (Project No. 2016-GAP-MÜMF-0004) of İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University.
- Aadnoy BS (1996) Modern well design. A. A. Balkema Publishers, NetherlandGoogle Scholar
- API Specification 13A (2010) Specifications for drilling fluid materials, 18th edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, p 130Google Scholar
- Dönmez M, Akçay AA, Türkecan A (2014) İzmir-K 18 Paftası, 1:100.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, No:213, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
- Ewy RT, Bovberg CA, Stankovich RJ (2008) Shale triaxial strength alteration due to brine exposure. The 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium (USRMS), 29 June-2 July, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
- Gündoğdu MN (1982) Geological, mineralogical and geochemical investigatoin of the Neogene aged Bigadic sedimentary basin. PhD Thesis, Geological Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
- ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974-2006. Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group. ISRM, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
- Javalagi S and Singireddy SR (2012) Hydraulic fluid properties and its influence on system performance. Master’s degree project. Division of fluid and mechatronic systems department of management and engineering. LIU-IEI-TEK-A--12/01284—SEGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Feng Q, Wang Y, Bai Y, Wei J, Song Z (2017) The effect of polymer-fiber stabilization on the unconfined compressive strength and shear strength of sand. Adv Mater Sci Eng Article ID 2370763, 9 pagesGoogle Scholar
- Mkpoikana R, Dosunmu A, Eme C (2015) Prevention of shale instability by optimizing drilling fluid performance. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, 4-6 August, Lagos, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
- Nmebgu CGJ, Ohazurulike LV (2014) Wellbore instability in oil well drilling: a review. Int J Eng Res Dev 10(5):11–20Google Scholar
- Pasic B, Medimurec NG, Matanovic D (2007) Wellbore instability: causes and consequences. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik 19:87–98Google Scholar
- Plaxis (2016) PLAXIS material models manual. Plaxis, DelftGoogle Scholar
- Shakib JT, Jalalifar H, Akhgarian E (2013) Wellbore stability in shale formation using analytical and numerical simulation. J Chem Petrol Eng 47(1):51–60Google Scholar
- Yan C, Deng J, Yu B (2013) Wellbore stability in oil and gas drilling with chemical-mechanical coupling. Sci World J 2013:720271Google Scholar
- Yu B, Yan C, Nie Z (2013) Chemical effect on wellbore instability of Nahr Umr shale. Sci World J 2013:931034Google Scholar
- Zhang J (2017) Effects of porosity and permeability on invasion depth during drilling mud-filtrate invading into a reservoir dynamically. Adv Comput Sci Res 76:203–206Google Scholar