Advertisement

Automatic extraction of sparse trees from high-resolution ortho-images

  • Bulent Bayram
  • Dursun Zafer Seker
  • Akhtar Jamil
  • Hatice Catal Reis
  • Nusret Demir
  • Salih Bozkurt
  • Abdulkadir Ince
  • Turgay Kucuk
Original Paper
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Obtaining information about tree species distribution in agricultural lands is a topic of interest for various applications, such as tree inventory, forest management, agricultural land management, crop estimation, etc. This information can be derived from images obtained from modern remote sensing technology, which is the most economical way as compare to field surveys covering large geographic areas. Therefore, in this study, a new method is proposed for extraction and counting of sparse and regular distributed individual pistachio trees from agricultural areas on large scale from high-resolution digital ortho-photo maps, which were obtained using an airborne sensor (Ultracam-X). The input images were first smoothed by applying Gaussian filter to reduce the impact of noise. Normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVI) were then derived to obtain vegetation areas followed by Otsu’s global thresholding algorithm to obtain candidate tree areas. Further, connected component (CC) analysis was applied to segregate each object. Morphological processing was performed to fill holes within tree objects and get smooth contours, which were obtained by using the Moore-neighbor tracing method (MNTM) for each CC, while geometrical constraints were applied to undermine possible non-tree elements from output image. To further improve the segmentation results for sparse trees, a new method was applied, called quadratic local analysis (QLA). QLA helped to segment the trees, which were missed by the Otsu method due to low contrast and resulted in improved accuracy (3–6%). The obtained results were compared with well-known support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Proposed method produced slightly better results (1–5%) than SVM for extraction of pistachio trees and obtained accuracy for QLA and SVM were 96 and 91% for region 1, while 91 and 90% for region 2 respectively.

Keywords

Automatic digitization Sparse tree extraction Otsu method Moore-neighbor tracing method Connect component analysis Morphological processing Support vector machine 

Notes

Funding information

This study is a part of TEYDEP Project entitled “Development of Object Based Neural Network Image Processing System Determination of Vegetation and Forestry Boundaries” (Project Nr. 7140512). It was supervised by EMI Group-Turkey and consulted by Prof. Dr. Bulent Bayram.

References

  1. Ardila JP, Bijker W, Tolpekin VA, Alfred S (2012) Multitemporal change detection of urban trees using localized region-based active contours in VHR images. Remote Sens Environ 124:413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baret F, Guyot G (1991) Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens Environ 35(2–3):161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng S, Katoh M, Guan Q, Yin N, Li M (2014) Estimating forest aboveground biomass by combining ALOS PALSAR and WorldView-2 data: a case study at Purple Mountain National Park, Nanjing, China. Remote Sens 6:7878–7910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dey V, Zhang Y, Zhong M, (2010) A review on image segmentation techniques with remote sensing perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Symposium (ISPRS10), vol. XXXVIII (Part 7A), Austria, pp. 31–42Google Scholar
  5. Gonzales RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2009) Digital image processing using MATLAB, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall Publishing, p 827Google Scholar
  6. Gebreslasie MT, Ahmed FB, Aardt JANV, Blakeway F (2011) Individual tree detection based on variable and fixed window size local maxima filtering applied to IKONOS imagery for even-aged Eucalyptus plantation forests, Int J Remote Sens Vol. 32, No. 15, 10 August 2011, 4141–4154Google Scholar
  7. Forthofer R, Lee E, Hernandez M (2006) Biostatistics: a guide to design, analysis and discovery, Elsevier Academic Press, 2nd Ed., USA, 528 pagesGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamuda E, Glavin M, Jones E (2016) A survey of image processing techniques for plant extraction and segmentation in the field. Comput Electron Agric 125:184–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heikkinen V, Tokola T, Parkkinen J, Korpela I, Jaaskelainen T (2010) Simulated multispectral imagery for tree species classification using support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:1355–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Z, Gong H and Zhu L (2007) Fast flooding information extraction in emergency response of flood disaster. Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop on Updating Geo-Spatial Databases with Imagery and the 5th ISPRS Workshop on DMGISs, Urumchi, 28–29 August 2007, 173–177Google Scholar
  11. Jin X, Davis CH (2005) Automated building extraction from high-resolution satellite imagery in urban areas using structural, contextual, and spectral information. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 14:2196–2206Google Scholar
  12. Kamiran N, Sarker MLR (2014) Exploring the potential of high resolution remote sensing data for mapping vegetation and the age groups of oil palm plantation. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 18:1Google Scholar
  13. Ke Y, Quackenbush LJ (2011) A review of methods for automatic individual tree crown detection and delineation from passive remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 32:4725–4747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch B, Heyder U, Welnacker H (2006) Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72(4):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwak DA, Lee WK, Lee JH, Biging GS, Gong P (2007) Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data. J For Res 12(6):425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin Y, Miao J, Yunjun Y, Lifu Z, Jiayuan L (2015) Use of UAV oblique imaging for the detection of individual trees in residential environments. Urban For Urban Green 14:404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Machado C, Beltrame AMK, Shinohara EJ, Giannotti M, Durieux L, Nobrega TMQ, Quintanilha JA (2014) Identifying concentrated areas of trip generators from high spatial resolution satellite images using object-based classification techniques. Appl Geogr 53:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maldonado W, Barbosa JC (2016) Automatic green fruit counting in orange trees using digital images. Comput Electron Agric 127:572–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okeh UM, Okoro CN (2012) Evaluating measures of indicators of diagnostic test performance: fundamental meanings and formulas. J Biom Biostat 3(1):1–10Google Scholar
  20. Park T, Lee J, Lee W, Kwak D, Kwak H, Lee S (2011) Automated individual tree detection and crown delineation using high spatial resolution RGB aerial imagery. Korean J Remote Sens 27(6):703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pouliot DA, King DJ (2005) Approaches for optimal automated individual tree crown detection in regenerating coniferous forests. Can J Remote Sens 31(3):255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Puissant A, Rougier S, Stumpf A (2014) Object-oriented mapping of urban trees using Random Forest classifiers. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 26:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Recio JA, Hermosilla T, Ruiz LA, Palomar J (2013) Automated extraction of tree and plot-based parameters in citrus orchards from aerial images. Comput Electron Agric 90:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9(1):62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ozcan, A.H., Sayar, Y., Hisar, D., Unsalan, C. 2015. Multiscale tree analysis from satellite images, 2015 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), 16–19 June 2015Google Scholar
  26. Schmitt M, Shahzad M, Zhu XX (2015) Reconstruction of individual trees from multi-aspect TomoSAR data. Remote Sens Environ 165:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shufelt JA (1999) Performance evaluation and analysis of monocular building extraction from aerial imagery. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(4):311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suhardiman A, Tsuyuki S, Setiawan Y (2016) Estimating mean tree crown diameter of mangrove stands using aerial photo. Procedia Environ Sci 33:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun H, Ding Y, Huang Y, Wang G (2016) Critical assessment of object segmentation in aerial image using Geo-Hausdorff distance, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B4, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic  https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B4-187-2016, 187–194)
  30. Wang L, Gong P, Biging GS (2004) Individual tree-crown delineation and treetop detection in high-spatial-resolution aerial imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70(3):351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Y (2016) Automatic extraction of building outline from high resolution aerial imagery, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B3, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic, (DOI:10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B3-419-2016, 419–423)Google Scholar
  32. Zou KH, O’Malley AJ, Mauri L (2007) Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 115:654–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39(4):561–577Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bulent Bayram
    • 1
  • Dursun Zafer Seker
    • 2
  • Akhtar Jamil
    • 1
  • Hatice Catal Reis
    • 3
  • Nusret Demir
    • 4
  • Salih Bozkurt
    • 1
  • Abdulkadir Ince
    • 1
  • Turgay Kucuk
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Geomatics EngineeringYTU, Yildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geomatics EngineeringITU, Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Geomatics EngineeringGumushane UniversityGumushaneTurkey
  4. 4.Faculty of Science, Department of Space Science and Technologies, Remote Sensing Application and Research CenterAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  5. 5.EMI Group Information Technologies Incorporated CompanyIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations