Advertisement

Prioritization of subwatersheds based on quantitative morphometric analysis in lower Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu, India using DEM and GIS techniques

  • Anand Balasubramanian
  • Karunanidhi DuraisamyEmail author
  • Subramani Thirumalaisamy
  • Srinivasamoorthy Krishnaraj
  • Raneesh Kolladi Yatheendradasan
Original Paper

Abstract

Watershed prioritization is one of the most important processes in natural resource management system especially in areas of sustainable watershed development and planning. Morphometric characteristics are the viable entity to understand the hydrological behavior of the subwatershed. For prioritization of subwatershed, morphometric analysis was utilized by using the linear, areal, and relief aspects of the drainage basin. In this context, remote sensing and GIS has been proved to be an efficient tool to identify the morphological features. The Survey of India (SOI) topographical maps, satellite data IRS-LISS III, and Cartosat DEM data were utilized to understand the drainage pattern and also for prioritization of subwatershed areas. The prioritization of subwatershed has been attempted using novel and quantitative approaches based on compound parameter ranking for soil erosion. Lower compound factors were chosen as the most feasible for soil erosion. Based on the observation, eight subwatersheds with a higher degree of the slope were severely prone to soil erosion and remaining 21 subwatersheds occur in low-lying areas that can be developed as sustainable watersheds. The identified subwatershed requires immediate soil remediation and water conservation measures for efficient watershed planning and management. The proposed study might be helpful for resource planners, government agencies, private sectors, and other stake holders to take up soil conservation measures and fixation of water-harvesting structures for better decision making.

Keywords

Morphometry DEM Subwatershed Compound factor Prioritization Lower Bhavani basin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like thank to Dr. S. Thangavelu, Chairman, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore-641062, India for providing all facilities and a wonderful platform for research. The authors are also thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding information

The authors are greatly indebted to the Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS) Department of Science and Technology (Government of India), Ref. No: NRDMS/01/09/014 dated 31.12.2015 for providing the grants and support to carry out this work effectively.

References

  1. Adinarayana J, Ramakrishan N, Gopal Rao K (1995) An integrated approach for prioritisation of watersheds. J Environ Mgment 44(4):375–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90374-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal CS (1998) Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 26:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aher PD, Adinarayana J, Gorantiwar SD (2014) Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J. of Hydro 511:850–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR (1999) Prioritisation of sub-watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin—a remote sensing and GIS approach. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 27:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das AK, Mukherjee S (2005) Drainage morphometry satellite data and GIS in Raigad District, Maharastra. J. Geo. Soc. of India 65:577–586Google Scholar
  6. Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2013) Prioritization of Shakkar River catchment through morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J. of Emg. Tech. in Mech. Sci. and Engg 4(2):129–142Google Scholar
  7. Gottschalk LC (1964) Reservoir sedimentation. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York section 7–1Google Scholar
  8. Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 13:350–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56(3):275–370.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Javed A, Khanday MY, Rais S (2011) Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/ land cover parameters: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. J Geo Soc of India 78(1):63–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-011-0068-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khare D, Mondal A, Mishra PK, Kundu S, Meena PK (2014) Morphometric analysis for prioritization using remote sensing and GIS techniques in a hilly catchment in the State of Uttrakhand, India. Indian J Sci and Tech 7(10):1650–1662Google Scholar
  12. Magesh NS, Chandrasekhar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64(2):373–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0860-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Project NR 389042, Tech. Rept. 3. Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, N YGoogle Scholar
  14. Mueller JE (1973) Re-evaluation of the relationship of master streams and drainage basins: reply. Geol Soc Am Bull 84(9):3127–3130.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1973)84<3127:ROTROM>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nag SK (1998) Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chakra sub-basin Purulia District, West Bengal. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 26:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nookaratnam K, Srivastava YK, Venkateswarao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 33(1):25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pareta K, Pareta U (2011) Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of a Yamuna Basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. Int J of Geomatics and Geosci 2(1):248–269Google Scholar
  18. Patel DP, Dholakia MB, Naresh N, Srivastava PK (2012) Water harvesting structure positioning by using geo-visualization concept and prioritization of mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis in the lower Tapi basin. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 40(2):299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rai PK, Mohan K, Mishra S, Ahmad A, Mishra VN (2014) A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River basin, India. Appl Water Sci 7(1):217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rudraiah M, Govindaiah S, Vittala SS (2008) Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna River basin, Gulburga District, Karnataka. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 36:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schumn SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67(5):597–646.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma SK, Yadav A, Gajbhiye S, (2014) Remote sensing and GIS approach for prioritization of watershed. Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, ISBN 978-3-659-53529-1Google Scholar
  23. Singh S, Singh MC (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar River basin. Nat Geo J of India 43(1):31–43Google Scholar
  24. Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading textures of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248(9):655–668.  https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.248.9.655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sreedevi PD, Owais S, Khan HH, Ahamed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of South India using SRTM data and GIS. J. Geo. Soc. of India 73(4):543–552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0038-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srivastava VK, Maitra D (1995) Study of drainage pattern of Raniganj coalfield (Burdwan District) as observed on Landsat-TM/IRS LISS II imagery. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens 23:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38(6):913–920.  https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York section 4Google Scholar
  29. Suresh R (2007) Soil and water conservation engineering. Standard Publishers and Distributors, Delhi, pp 799–812Google Scholar
  30. Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH (2008) Prioritization of sub-watersheds for sustainable development and management of natural resources: an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and socio-economic data. Curr Sci 95(3):345–354Google Scholar
  31. Withanage NS, Dayawansa NDK, De Silva RP (2014) Morphometric analysis of the gal Oya River basin using spatial data derived from GIS. Trop Agr Res 26(1):175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anand Balasubramanian
    • 1
  • Karunanidhi Duraisamy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subramani Thirumalaisamy
    • 2
  • Srinivasamoorthy Krishnaraj
    • 3
  • Raneesh Kolladi Yatheendradasan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering (Centre for Geoinformatics and Water Technology)Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringAnna University, CEG CampusChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesPondicherry UniversityPuducherryIndia
  4. 4.Department of Agricultural Engineering (Centre for Geoinformatics and Water Technology)Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations