Advertisement

Two-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and time-domain-induced polarization (TDIP) study in hard rock for groundwater investigation: a case study at Choutuppal Telangana, India

  • Dewashish Kumar
  • Setbandhu Mondal
  • M. J. Nandan
  • P. Harini
  • B. M. V. Soma Sekhar
  • Mrinal K. Sen
Original Paper

Abstract

Groundwater investigation in a crystalline rock is a crucial task. A study was carried out at Choutuppal Telangana, India, under the pivotal research project of societal relevance. High-resolution electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and time-domain-induced polarization (TDIP) dataset were collected in a granitic terrain to solve the groundwater problem as people are facing acute shortage of drinking water in the study area. The interpreted results derived from two-dimensional (2D) inverted resistivity models revealed substantial resistivity contrast between the weathered and massive granite and delineated three groundwater prospects zones, where the degree of weathering of fractured granite decreases with depth. On the other hand, the induced polarization (IP) results reflect marginal chargeability contrast, which indicates groundwater prospect zone. The basement of the hard rock aquifer system is clearly delineated showing very high resistivity with a range from 5000 to ~4 × 105 Ohm.m, which is confirmed by drilling at two places. Both the wells are drilled during the month of April and June, 2013, which are productive with a yield varying from 82.14 to 105 l/min. This study may help in future planning for groundwater exploration strategy and development for groundwater resources.

Keywords

Electrical resistivity Induced polarization Granitic hard rock aquifer Groundwater exploration India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our sincere gratitude goes to Prof. Mrinal K. Sen, former Director and present Director CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India, for his encouragement and full support for the CSIR-800 activity and kind permission for carrying out this important research work for societal benefit through scientific intervention. Dr. V.S. Sarma, a retired chief scientist and project advisor, is duly acknowledged for reviewing this paper. The financial assistance provided for this project work by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, under the 12th Five Year Plan of CSIR-800 program is duly acknowledged. Authors thank Dr. S. Thiagarajan and Mr. Varun Kumar for drafting and improving the figures’ quality. Authors acknowledge both the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved the quality of the paper.

References

  1. Abdulaziz AM, Hurtado JM, Faid A (2012) Hydrogeological characterization of Gold Valley: an investigation of precipitation recharge in an intermountain basin in the Death Valley region, California, USA. Hydrogeol J 20(4):701–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ABEM (2012) ABEM Instruction Manual – Terrameter LS, Stockholm, 2012, pp 110Google Scholar
  3. Adepelumi AA, Yi MJ, Kim JH, Ako BD, Son JS (2006) Integration of surface geophysical methods for fracture detection in crystalline bedrocks of southwestern Nigeria. Hydrogeol J 14:1284–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aizebeokhai AP, Oyeyemi KD (2014) The use of the multiple-gradient array for geoelectrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging. J Appl Geophys 111:364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrade R (2011) Intervention of electrical resistance tomography (ERT) in resolving hydrological problems of a semi-arid granite terrain of southern India. J Geol Soc India 78(4):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babar M (2005) Hydrological properties of rocks chapter 5. Hydrogeomorphology—fundamentals. Applications and Techniques. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, p. 274Google Scholar
  7. Barker RD (1992) A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface. First Break 10:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batayneh Awni T (2001) Resistivity imaging for near-surface resistive dyke using two-dimensional DC resistivity techniques. J Appl Geophys 48:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beauvais A, Ritz M, Parisot JC, Dukhan J, Bantsimba C (1999) Analysis of poorly stratified lateritic terrains overlying a granitic bedrock in West Africa, using 2-D electrical resistivity tomography. Earth Planet Sci Lett 173:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beauvais A, Ritz M, Parisot JC, Bantsimba C, Dukhan M (2004) Combined ERT and GPR methods for investigating two-stepped lateritic weathering systems. Geoderma 119:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CGWB (2007) Groundwater information Nalgonda district, Telangana central ground water board. Ministry of Water Resources Government of India, southern region Hyderabad, Pp 1-34Google Scholar
  12. CGWB (2013) Groundwater information booklet. Ministry of Water Resources, Ganjam District, Orissa 1-18.Google Scholar
  13. Dahlin T (1996) 2-D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications. First Break 14:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahlin T, Loke MH (1998) Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modelling. J Appl Geophys 38:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophys Prospect 52:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlin T, Zhou B (2006) Multiple-gradient array measurements for multichannel 2D resistivity imaging. Near Surface Geophys 4:113–123Google Scholar
  17. Daily W, Ramirez A, Binley A, Labrecque D (2004) Electrical resistance tomography. Lead Edge 23:438–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gazoty A, Fiandaca G, Pedersen J, Auken E, Christiansen AV, Pedersen JK (2012) Application of time domain induced polarization to the mapping of lithotypes in a landfill site. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1793–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffiths DH, Barker RD (1993) Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths DH, Turnbull J (1985) A multi electrode array for resistivity surveying. First Break 3:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths DH, Turnbull J, Olayinka AI (1990) Two dimensional resistivity mapping with A computer controlled Array. First Break 8:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. GSI (1995) Geological survey of India’s geology and minerals map of Nalgonda district Telangana, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Hossain D (2000) 2D electrical imaging survey in hydrogeology, the Bangladesh. J Sediment Res 18(1):57–66Google Scholar
  24. Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (1966) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Koefoed O (1979) Geosounding principles: 1. Resistivity Sounding Measurements, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Krishnamurthy NS, Ananda Rao V, Kumar D, Singh KKK, Ahmed S (2009) Electrical resistivity imaging technique to delineate coal seam barrier thickness and demarcate Water filled voids. J Geol Soc India 73(5):639–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar D (2004) Conceptualization and optimal data requirement in simulating flow in weathered-fractured aquifers for groundwater management, Ph.D. Thesis, Osmania University, Hyderabad, 213 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar D (2012) Efficacy of electrical resistivity tomography technique in mapping shallow subsurface anomaly. J Geol Soc India 80(3):304–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar D, Rao VA, Nagaiah E, Raju PK, Mallesh D, Ahmeduddin M, Ahmed S (2010) Integrated geophysical study to decipher potential groundwater and zeolite-bearing zones in Deccan Traps. Curr Sci 98(6):803–814Google Scholar
  30. Kumar D, Mondal S, Nandan MJ, Harini P, Soma Sekhar BMV, Sen MK (2013) Analysis of full waveform 2D resistivity data for groundwater exploration – A case study, presented and published in Souvenir of AEG of 35th Annual Convention, Seminar on Exploration Geophysics, Special theme “Integration of Geosciences and Societal Development” during 3–5 October, 2013 at New Delhi, pp. 11–12Google Scholar
  31. Kumar D, Rao VA, Sarma VS (2014a) Hydrogeological and geophysical study for deeper groundwater resource in quartzitic hard rock ridge region from 2D resistivity data. J Earth Syst Sci 123(3):531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar D, Nandan MJ, Mondal S, Soma Sekhar BMV, Sridhar K, Balaji T (2014b) Full waveform inversion of 2D resistivity & IP data for groundwater exploration presented and published in Souvenir of 4th International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management held during 29th October – 1st November, 2014 at Hyderabad, India, pp. 5Google Scholar
  33. Leveinen J, Ronka E, Tikkanen J, Karro E (1998) Fractional flow dimensions and hydraulic properties of a fracture-zone aquifer, Leppavirta, Finland. Hydrogeol J 6:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loke MH, Dahlin T (2002) A comparison of the Gauss–Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. J Appl Geophys 49:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu K, MacNae J, Buselli, J (1999) A study of a two-dimensional resistivity and IP array. In: Proceedings of the SAGEEP (Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems), EEGS, the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Denver, 951–960Google Scholar
  37. Marechal JC, Dewandel B, Subrahmanyam K (2004) Contribution of hydraulic tests at different scales to characterize fracture network properties in the weathered-fissured layer of a hard rock aquifers. Water Resour Res 40:W11508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Owen RJ, Gwavava O, Gwaze P (2005) Multi-electrode resistivity survey for groundwater exploration in the Harare greenstone belt, Zimbabwe. Hydrogeol J 14:244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratna Kumari Y, Rai SN, Thiagarajan S, Kumar D (2012) 2D electrical resistivity imaging for delineation of deeper aquifers in parts of Chandrabhaga river basin, Nagpur district, Maharashtra, India. Curr Sci 102(1):61–69Google Scholar
  40. Revil A, Karaoulis M, Johnson T, Kemna A (2012) Review: some low-frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 20(4):617–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritz M, Parisot JC, Diouf S, Beauvais A, Diome F, Niang M (1999) Electrical imaging of lateritic weathering mantles over granitic and metamorphic basement of eastern Senegal, West Africa. J Appl Geophys 41:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robert T, Dassargues A, Brouyère S, Kaufmann O, Hallet V, Nguyen F (2011) Assessing the contribution of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self-potential (SP) methods for a water well drilling program in fractured/karstified limestones. J Appl Geophys 75:42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shamaun Kabir ASM, Hossain D, Abdullah R (2011) 2-D electrical imaging in some geotechnical investigation of Madhupur Clays, Bangladesh. J Geol Soc India 77(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh SP, Verma RAK (2015) Water resource management in hard rock terrain for sustaining irrigated agriculture—a case study of Jharkhand, India. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6(10):795–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Source (1998) Groundwater prospects map, Satellite Imagery NRSA. Govt. of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  46. Venkateswara Rao B, Siva Prasad Y, Srinivas Reddy K (2013) Hydrogeophysical investigation in a typical Khondalitic terrain to delineate the kaolinised layer using resistivity imaging. J Geol Soc India 81(4):521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dewashish Kumar
    • 1
  • Setbandhu Mondal
    • 1
  • M. J. Nandan
    • 1
  • P. Harini
    • 1
  • B. M. V. Soma Sekhar
    • 1
  • Mrinal K. Sen
    • 2
  1. 1.Council of Scientific and Industrial Research -National Geophysical Research InstituteHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations