Triaxial test of drained sand reinforced with plastic layers

Original Paper

Abstract

During the past earthquake, the liquefaction phenomenon of saturated sand mixture has been the cause of severe damage to various buildings and other structures. The catastrophic nature of this type of failure obliged to build a structure on geosynthetics will be used to reinforce the soil and improve its mechanical properties. Reinforcing elements in the form of layers or sheets of waste materials in soil is important because of their use in practical civil engineering and geotechnical applications. The main advantages of such materials are they are locally available, inexpensive, and recyclable. Waste plastics have been successfully used as reinforcement in soil to improve shear strength parameters and the stiffness modulus. This paper focuses on the behavior of plastic reinforcement in sand under triaxial monotonic drained conditions. Laboratory triaxial compression tests were carried out to determine stress and strain, volumetric change behavior, and shear strength parameters and to estimate the strength ratio at various strain levels in sand reinforced with plastic layers. The test involved one to five plastic layers that were placed at regular vertical spacings within the sand. The results demonstrated that the inclusion of plastic layers increases the maximum deviator stress, shear strength parameters and ductility, with the maximum increase corresponding to the five layers of plastic. The inclusion of plastic layers reduces dilation and increases the strength ratio, with the percent increase being greater at higher strain levels. The lower secant modulus was measured in the unreinforced and reinforced sand, with the latter exhibiting higher values of secant modulus at axial strains of 1 % that tend to stabilize for higher values of axial strain.

Keywords

Triaxial test Soil reinforcement Geotextiles Waste plastic Shear strength Secant modulus 

References

  1. Al-Refeai TO (1990) Laboratory tests on geotextiles reinforced dune sans. Arab J Sci Eng 15(2A):165–174Google Scholar
  2. Athanasopoulos GA (1993) Effect of particle size on the mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile composites. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12: 255--273Google Scholar
  3. Ashmawy AK, Bourdeau PL (1998) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on stress–strain and volumetric response of sand. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Geosynthetics. Atlanta 2:1079–1082Google Scholar
  4. Bishop AW, Henkel DJ (1969) The measurement of soil properties in the triaxial test. Wiliam Clowes and Sons Limited, London and BecclesGoogle Scholar
  5. Consoli NC, Montardo JP, Prietto PDM, Passa GS (2002) Engineering behavior of sand reinforced with plastic waste. Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 128(6):462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dali BM (1989) Renforcement des sols par des nappes d’éléments souples et discontinus: Etude de procédé Plasterre. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lyon IGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray DH, Al-Refeai TO (1986) Behavior of fabric fiber reinforced sand. Geotech Eng 112(8):804–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray DH, Asce AM, Ohashi H (1983) Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand. Geotech Eng 109(3):335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haeri SM, Noorzad R, Oskoorouchi AM (2000) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behaviour of sand. Geotext Geomembr 18:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Head KH (1986) Manual of soil laboratory testing, 2. Pentech Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Lade PV, Duncan JM (1973) Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE, vol. 99, n° SM10:793–812Google Scholar
  12. Latha MG, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 25:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Messas T (1999) Caractérisation et renforcement des sols avec inclusion de nappes plastiques souples discontinues. Rev Fr Géotech 87:55–62Google Scholar
  14. Michalowski RL, Cermak J (2003) Triaxial compression of sand reinforced with fibers. Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 129(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moghaddas TSN, Asakereh A (2007) Strength evaluation of wet reinforced silty sand by triaxial test. International Journal of Civil Engineering 5(4):274–283Google Scholar
  16. Nguyen MD, Yang KH, Lee SH, Wu CS, Tsai MH (2013) Behavior of nonwoven-geotextile-reinforced sand and mobilization of reinforcement strain under triaxial compression. Geosynth Int 20:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Noorzad R, Mirmoradi SH (2010) Laboratory evaluation of the behavior of a geotextile reinforced clay. Geotext Geomembr 28:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rakotondramanitra JD (1988) Renforcement des sols par des nappes de déchets de matières plastiques. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lyon IGoogle Scholar
  19. Richa B (1992) Etude au triaxial dynamique de liquéfaction des sols renforcés par géotextiles. Université de Joseph Fourier IRIGM-LGM, Thèse de doctoratGoogle Scholar
  20. Vercueil D, Billet P, Cordary D (1997) Study of the liquefaction resistance of a saturated sand reinforced with geosynthetics. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Nouri
    • 1
  • A. Nechnech
    • 2
  • B. Lamri
    • 1
  • M. Lurdes Lopes
    • 3
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentUHBCHay Essalam ChlefAlgeria
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUSTHBBab Ezzouar AlgiersAlgeria
  3. 3.Civil Engineering DepartmentUPPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations