Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 2739–2750 | Cite as

Hydrogeochemical characteristics of Karst Aquifer from a semi-arid region of Southern India and impact of rainfall recharge on groundwater chemistry

  • Farooq Ahmad DarEmail author
  • Jerome Perrin
  • Shakeel Ahmed
  • Allu China Narayana
  • Jean Riotte
Original Paper


The highly heterogeneous and anisotropic property of karst aquifers is a result of the dissolution and karstification of carbonate rocks. Hydrogeochemical evolution and possible water–rock interaction is therefore discussed through spatial and temporal variations in physico–chemical variables of groundwater. Samples were collected both from spring and bore wells. Dissolution of carbonate minerals is the main source of major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+ and HCO3 ) in the water. Agricultural activities cause an increase in the concentration of pollution-related ions (nitrates, sulphates, chlorides, etc.). The variability of water chemistry was discussed in terms of different processes like dilution and water–rock interactions, etc. The study reveals a pronounced seasonal hydrochemical variation in the limestone aquifer. In general, the karst groundwater is of Ca–Mg–HCO3 type. Hydrogeochemical signature also helped to analyse the recharge types in the area. The semi-arid climate of the area also contributes to the increase of concentration of certain ions.


Hydrogeochemistry Karst aquifer Semi-arid Southern India 



The authors are grateful to Prof. Mrinal K. Sen, the Director, CSIR-NGRI, Hyderabad, for permission to publish the work. The first author is thankful to the University Grants Commission and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for financial support through JRF/SRF. The French Embassy is also acknowledged for providing traineeship for 4 months in France. Thanks are due to Dr. Krishnaiah and other Belum Cave employees of Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation and Mr. Wajid-u-din and Mr. Ahmed-u-din for support during field works. We are highly thankful to the two reviewers who have commented on every aspect of the paper that greatly helped to modify its contents.


  1. Blavoux B, Mudry J (1983) Chemical separation of karst springs hydrographs. Hydrogeol J 4:270–278Google Scholar
  2. Boyer DG, Pasquarell GC (1996) Agricultural land use effects on nitrate concentrations in a mature karst aquifer. J Am Water Resour Assoc 32:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhmann D, Dreybrodt W (1985) The kinetics of calcite dissolution and precipitation in geologically relevant situations of karst areas. Chem Geol 48:189–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dar FA (2014) Hydrogeological characteristics of carbonate formations of the Cuddapah Basin, India. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  5. Dar FA, Perrin J, Riotte J, Gebauer HD, Narayana AC, Ahmed S (2011) Karstification in the Cuddapah Sedimentary Basin, Southern India. Implications for Groundwater Resources. Acta Carsologica 40(3):457–472Google Scholar
  6. Dar FA, Perrin J, Ahmed S, Narayana AC (2014) Review: carbonate aquifers and future perspectives of Karst hydrogeology in India. Hydrogeol J. doi: 10.1007/s10040-014-1151-z
  7. El-Sayed MH, El-Fadl M, Shawky HA (2012) Impact of hydrochemical processes on groundwater quality, Wadi Feiran, South Sinai, Egypt. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6(3):638–654Google Scholar
  8. Ford DC, Williams PW (2007) Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Wiley, pp. 562Google Scholar
  9. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 604Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling world’s water chemistry. Science 170:1088–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glynn PD, Plummer N (2005) Geochemistry and the understanding of ground-water systems. Hydrogeol J 13:263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GSI (1997) Cuddapah geological quadrangle map series (1:250,000). Geological Survey of India, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  13. Hess JW, White WB (1988) Storm response of the karstic carbonate aquifer of south-central Kentucky. J Hydrol 99:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobson RL, Langmuir D (1974) Controls on the quality variation of some carbonate spring waters. J Hydrol 23:247–265Google Scholar
  15. Jankowski J, Acworth RI (1997) Impact of debris-flow deposits on hydrogeochemical process and the development of dry land salinity in the Yass River catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Hydrogeol J 5(4):71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeong CH (2001) Effect of land use and urbanization on hydrochemistry and contamination of groundwater from Taejon area, Korea. J Hydrol 253:194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karimi H, Raeisi E, Bakalowicz M (2005) Characterising the main karst aquifers of the Alvand basin, northwest of Zagros, Iran, by a hydrogeochemical approach. Hydrogeol J 13(5–6):787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katz BG, Gopalan TB, Bullen TD, Davis JH (1998) Use of chemical and isotopic tracers to characterise the interaction between groundwater and surface water in mantled karst. Groundw J 35:1014–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingsbury JA (2008) Relation between flow and temporal variations of nitrate and pesticides in two Karst Springs in Northern Alabama. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44:478–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kingsbury JA, Shelton JM (2002) Water quality of the Mississippian carbonate aquifer in parts of middle Tennessee and Northern Alabama, 1999. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4083, 36 pp., Nashville, Tennessee.
  21. Krawczyk WE, Ford DC (2006) Correlating specific conductivity with total hardness in limestone and dolomite Karst waters. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar JV (1983) Geological and hydrogeological studies of part of Cuddapah basin. PhD thesis. Osmania University, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  23. Lang YC, Liu CQ, Zhao ZQ, Li SL, Han GL (2006) Geochemistry of surface and ground water in Guiyang, China: water/rock interaction and pollution in a karst hydrological system. Appl Geochem 21(6):887–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langelier WF, Ludwig HF (1941) Graphical method for indicating of the mineral character of natural waters. J Am Water Works Assoc 34:335–352Google Scholar
  25. Langmuir M (1971) The geochemistry of some carbonate ground waters in central Pennsylvania. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 35:1023–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magaritz M, Aravena R, Peaia H, Suzuki O, Grill A (1989) Water chemistry and isotope study of streams and springs in Northern Chile. J Hydrol 108:323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayback M (1987) Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from river dissolved loads. Am J Sci 287:401–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer J (1999) Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater chemistry in Petitjohns Cave, Northwest Georgia, USA. J Cave Karst Stud 61(3):131–138Google Scholar
  29. Mayo AL, Loucks DL (1995) Solute and isotopic geochemistry and ground water flow in the central Wasatch Range, Utah. J Hydrol 172:31–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moral F, Cruz-Sanjulian JJ, Olıas M (2008) Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the carbonate aquifers of Sierra de Segura (Betic Cordillera, southern Spain). J Hydrol 360:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Musgrove M, Banner JL (2004) Controls on the spatial and temporal variability of vadose dripwater geochemistry: Edwards aquifer, central Texas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68(5):1007–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrin J, Jeannin P-Y, Zwahlen F (2003) Implications of the spatial variability of the infiltration water chemistry for the investigation of a karst aquifer. Hydrogeol J 11(6):673–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perrin J, Jeannin P-Y, Cornaton F (2006) The role of tributary mixing in chemical variations at a karst spring. J Hydrol 332:158–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson EW, Davis RK, Brahana JV, Orndorff HA (2000) Movement of nitrate through regolith covered karst terrain, Northwest Arkansas. J Hydrol 256(1–2):35–47Google Scholar
  35. Piper AMA (1953) Graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. Groundwater Note 12. United State Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  36. Plummer LN, Wigley TML, Parkhurst DL (1978) The kinetics of calcite dissolution in CO2 water systems at 5–60 C and 0.0-1.0 atm CO2. Am J Sci 278:179–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scanlon BR (1990) Relationships between groundwater contamination and major-ion chemistry in a karst aquifer. J Hydrol 119(1–4):271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scanlon BR, Thrailkill J (1987) Chemical similarities among physically distinct spring types in a karst terrain. J Hydrol 89:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuster ET, White WB (1971) Seasonal fluctuations in the chemistry of limestone spring: a possible means for characterizing carbonate aquifers. J Hydrol 14:93–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spalding RF, Exner ME, Martin GE, Snow DD (1993) Effects of sludge disposal on groundwater nitrate concentrations. J Hydrol 142:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ternan JL (1972) Comments on the use of a calcium hardness variability index in the study of carbonate aquifers with reference to the Central Pennines, England. J Hydrol 16:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tizro AT, Voudouris KS (2007) Groundwater quality in the semi-arid region of the Chahardouly basin, West Iran. Hydrol Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6893 Google Scholar
  43. Toran L, White WB (2005) Variation in nitrate and calcium as indicators of recharge pathways in Nolte Spring, PA. Environ Geol 48:854–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vervier P (1990) Hydrochemical characterization of the water dynamics of a karstic system. J Hydrol 121:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vesper DJ, Loop CM, White WB (2003) Contaminant transport in Karst aquifers. Speleogenesis Evol Karst Aquifers 1(2):2Google Scholar
  46. Wicks CM, Engeln JF (1997) Geochemical evolution of a karst stream in Devils Icebox Cave, Missouri, USA. J Hydrol 198(1–4):30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams PW (1983) The role of the subcutaneous zone in karst hydrology. J Hydrol 61:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu P, Tang C, Zhu L, Liu L, Cha X, Tao X (2009) Hydrogeochemical characteristics of surface water and groundwater in the karst basin, southwest China. Hydrol Process 23:2012–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farooq Ahmad Dar
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jerome Perrin
    • 2
  • Shakeel Ahmed
    • 1
  • Allu China Narayana
    • 3
  • Jean Riotte
    • 4
  1. 1.IFCGRCSIR-National Geophysical Research InstituteHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.BRGMOrleans Cedex 02France
  3. 3.Centre for Earth and Space SciencesUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia
  4. 4.Indo-French Cell for Water Sciences (IFCWS)IRDBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations