Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 7, Issue 11, pp 4665–4682 | Cite as

A new velocity field from the analysis of the Egyptian Permanent GPS Network (EPGN)

  • Mohamed SalehEmail author
  • Matthias Becker
Original Paper


For studying recent crustal movements and their relation to earthquake occurrence in large scales, the National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Helwan, Cairo, Egypt started in 2006 the establishment of the Egyptian Permanent GPS Network (EPGN). Beginning with 4 stations in 2007, 15 stations were operational at the end of 2011. In addition, a station in Alexandria of the French “Centre d'Études Alexandrines” (CEALX) was added as station to the EPGN. Nowadays, 16 stations are operational and an extension to 20 in the near future is expected. The collected EPGN data of the last 6 years are used in this work to throw light upon the present state of recent crustal movement of the whole of Egypt. Bernese software V. 5.0 was used for processing the collected data according to the IGS standards. In addition, selected IGS, AFREF, and EPN sites are processed for reference frame definition. In this first comprehensive analysis of the permanent network, a complete and consistent evaluation resulted in the first estimates of present day horizontal velocities and coordinate time series.


Egypt Time series Permanent GPS Stochastic model 



The authors would like to thank the staff member of the Crustal Movement Laboratory, Geodynamic Department, NRIAG for providing GPS data, special thank to Dr. Stefan Leinen from PSGD, TU-Darmstadt for his valuable help. Finally we thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for the support of this work.


  1. Agnew D (1992) The time-domain behavior of power-law noises. Geophys Res Lett 19:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamimi Z, Collilieux X, and Metivier L (2011) ITRF2008: an improved solution of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. J Geod 85: doi: 10.1007/s00190-011-0444-4
  3. Altamimi Z, Métivier L, Collilieux X (2012) ITRF2008 plate motion model. J Geophys Res 117, B07402. doi: 10.1029/2011JB008930 Google Scholar
  4. Argus D, Gordon R, Heflin M, Ma C, Eanes R, Willis P, Peltier WR, Owen S (2010) The angular velocities of the plates and the velocity of Earth’s center from space geodesy. Geophys J Int 180:913–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird P (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 4:1027. doi: 10.1029/2001GC000252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, and Meindl M (Eds.) (2007) Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0. Manual, Astronomical Institute, University of BerneGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1990) Current plate motions. Geophys J Int 101(2):425–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1994) Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions. Geophys Res Lett 21(20):2191–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jin S, Zhu W (2004) A revision of the parameters of the NNRNUVEL-1A plate velocity model. J Geodyn 38:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Langbein JO, Johnson H (1997) Correlated errors in geodetic time series: lmplications for time-dependent deformation. J Geophys Res 102:591–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langbein JO, Johnson H (1995) Noise level of geodetic monuments. EOS Trans Am Geophys Un 76:F142Google Scholar
  12. Langbein JO, Linker MF, McGarr AF, Slater LE (1987) Precision of two-color geodimeter measurements: results from 15 months of observations. J Geophys Res 92:11644–11656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahmoud S, Reilinger R, McClusky S, Vernant P, Tealeb A (2005) GPS evidence for northward motion of the Sinai block: implications for E. Mediterranean tectonics. Earth Planet Sci Lett 238:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandelbrot B, Van Ness J (1968) Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises, and applications. SIAM Rev 10:422–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mao A, Harrison CGA, Dixon TH (1999) Noise in GPS coordinate time series. J Geophys Res 104:2797–2816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClusky S et al (2000) Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105(B3):5695–5720. doi: 10.1029/1999JB900351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClusky S, Reilinger R, Mahmoud S, Ben Sari D, Tealeb A (2003) GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions,Geophys. J Int 155:126–138Google Scholar
  18. Reilinger RE, McClusky S, Vernant P, Lawrence S, Ergintav S, Cakmak R, Ozener H, Kadirov F, Guliev I, Stepanyan R, Nadariya M, Hahubia G, Mahmoud S, Sakr K, ArRajehi A, Paradissis D, Al-Aydrus A, Prilepin M, Guseva T, Evren E, Dmitrotsa A, Filikov SV, Gomez F, Al-Ghazzi R, Karam G (2006) GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J Geophys Res 111(B5), B05411. doi: 10.1029/2005JB004051 Google Scholar
  19. Said R (1990) The geology of Egypt. Balkema, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  20. Sella GF, Dixon TH, Mao A (2002) REVEL: a model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy. J Geophys Res 107(B4):2081. doi: 10.1029/2000JB000033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams SDP (2008) CATS: GPS coordinate time series analysis software. GPS Solutions 12:147–153. doi: 10.1007/s10291-007-0086-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams SDP (2003) The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series. J Geod 76:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s00190-002-0283-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wyatt FK (1982) Displacement of surface monuments: horizontal motion. J Geophys Res 87:979–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wyatt FK (1989) Displacement of surface monuments: vertical motion. J Geophys Res 94:1655–1664Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU-DarmstadtInstitute of GeodesyDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)HelwanEgypt

Personalised recommendations