Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 725–742

Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya

  • Amar Deep Regmi
  • Krishna Chandra Devkota
  • Kohki Yoshida
  • Biswajeet Pradhan
  • Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
  • Takashi Kumamoto
  • Aykut Akgun
Original Paper

Abstract

The Mugling–Narayanghat road section falls within the Lesser Himalaya and Siwalik zones of Central Nepal Himalaya and is highly deformed by the presence of numerous faults and folds. Over the years, this road section and its surrounding area have experienced repeated landslide activities. For that reason, landslide susceptibility zonation is essential for roadside slope disaster management and for planning further development activities. The main goal of this study was to investigate the application of the frequency ratio (FR), statistical index (SI), and weights-of-evidence (WoE) approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping of this road section and its surrounding area. For this purpose, the input layers of the landslide conditioning factors were prepared in the first stage. A landslide inventory map was prepared using earlier reports, aerial photographs interpretation, and multiple field surveys. A total of 438 landslide locations were detected. Out these, 295 (67 %) landslides were randomly selected as training data for the modeling using FR, SI, and WoE models and the remaining 143 (33 %) were used for the validation purposes. The landslide conditioning factors considered for the study area are slope gradient, slope aspect, plan curvature, altitude, stream power index, topographic wetness index, lithology, land use, distance from faults, distance from rivers, and distance from highway. The results were validated using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. From the analysis, it is seen that the FR model with a success rate of 76.8 % and predictive accuracy of 75.4 % performs better than WoE (success rate, 75.6 %; predictive accuracy, 74.9 %) and SI (success rate, 75.5 %; predictive accuracy, 74.6 %) models. Overall, all the models showed almost similar results. The resultant susceptibility maps can be useful for general land use planning.

Keywords

Landslides Frequency ratio Statistical index Weights-of-evidence GIS Himalaya 

References

  1. Adhikari TL (2009) Disaster mitigation works along Narayanghat Mugling Highway. International seminar on hazard management for sustainable development Google Scholar
  2. Agterberg FP (1992) Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence modeling for resource evaluation. Nat Res Res 1(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF, Cheng Q, Wright DF (1993) Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping. In: Davis JC, Herzfeld UC (eds) Computers in geology, 25 years of progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  4. Akgün A, Kincal C, Pradhan B (2011) Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (West Turkey). Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8
  5. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander DE (2008) A brief survey of GIS in mass movement studies, with reflections on theory and methods. Geomorphology 94:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 44:120–135. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277Google Scholar
  9. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydro Sci Bull 24:43–69Google Scholar
  11. Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P, Pergalani F, Rampini A (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster–Shafer approaches. Nat Hazards 17:77–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1988) Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. Photogr Eng Remote Sens 54:1585–1592Google Scholar
  13. Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1989) Weights of evidence modeling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. Statistical Applications in the Earth Science, Geological Survey of Canada Paper 89-9:171–183Google Scholar
  14. Bonham-Carter GF (1991) Integration of geoscientific data using GIS. In: Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, Maguire DJ (eds) Geographic information systems: principle and applications. Longman, London, pp 171–184Google Scholar
  15. Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. In: Bonham-Carter F (ed) Computer methods in the geosciences. Pergamon, Oxford, p 398Google Scholar
  16. Bonham-Carter GF (2002) Geographic information systems for geoscientist: modeling with GIS. Pergamon, New York, pp 302–334Google Scholar
  17. Bui HB, Nguyen Q, Nguyen VT (2008) GIS-based weight of evidence modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping at Jaechon area, Korea. International Symposium on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences, 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2011) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031
  19. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012a) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using artificial neural network. Geomorphology. doi:10.1016/ j.geomorph.2012.04.023
  20. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012b) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree and naïve Bayes models. Math Probl Eng 2012:1–26. doi:10.1155/2012/974638 Google Scholar
  21. Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012c) Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Vietnam: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 96:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen CH, Ke CC, Wang CL (2009) A back-propagation network for the assessment of susceptibility to rock slope failure in the eastern portion of the Southern Cross-Island Highway in Taiwan. Environ Geol 57:723–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng K, Wei C, Chang S (2004) Locating landslides using multitemporal satellite images. Adv Space Res 33:296–301Google Scholar
  24. Chung CJ, Fabbri AG (1998) Three Bayesian prediction models for landslide hazard. In: Buccianti R, Potenza R, Nardi G (eds) Proceedings of International Association for Mathematical Geology 1998 Annual Meeting (IAMG 98), Ischia, Italy, 1998, pp 204–211Google Scholar
  25. Chung CJ, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chung CJ, Fabbri A (2005) Systematic procedures of landslide hazard mapping for risk assessment using spatial prediction models. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, New York, pp 139–177Google Scholar
  27. Carranza EJM, Castro O (2006) Predicting lahar-inundation zones: case study in West Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. Nat Hazards 37:331–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carranza EJM, Hale M (2001) Geologically constrained fuzzy mapping of gold mineralization potential, Baguio District, Philippines. Nat Resour Res 10:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carranza EJM, Hale M (2002) Evidential belief functions for data-driven geologically constrained mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Ore Geol R 22:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carranza EJM, Hale M (2000) Geologically constrained probabilistic mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Nat Res Res 9:237–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Dhakal S, Paudyal P (2008a) Predictive modeling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of evidence. Geomorphology 102(3–4):496–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Masuda T, Nishino K (2008b) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modeling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 54(2):314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Daneshfar B, Benn K (2002) Spatial relationships between natural seismicity and faults, southeastern Ontario and north-central New York State. Tectonophysics 353:31–44Google Scholar
  35. Dangol V (2000) Slope instability study and hazard mapping of Syangja district, Western Nepal. Unpublished Report, ICIMOD, Katmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  36. Dangol V, Upreti BN, Dhital MR, Wagner A, Bhattarai TN, Bhandari AN, Pant SR, Sharma MP (1993) Engineering geological study of a proposed road corridor in Eastern Nepal. Bull Dept Geol Tribhuvan University 3(1):91–107Google Scholar
  37. Deoja B, Dhital MR, Thapa B, Wagner A (1991) Mountain risk engineering handbook. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, 857 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Devkota K, Regmi AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yishida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6
  39. Dhital MR, Upreti BN, Dangol V, Bhandari AN, Bhattarai TN (1991) Geological engineering methods applied in mountain road survey: an example from Baitadi–Darchula Road Project (Nepal). J Nepal Geol Soc 7:49–67Google Scholar
  40. Dhital MR (2005) Landslide investigation and mitigation in Himalayas: focus on Nepal. Proceedings of the International Symposium “Landslide Hazard in Orogenic Zone from the Himalaya to Island Arc in Asia,” 25–26 September, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  41. DWIDP (2009) The study on disaster risk management for Narayanghar–Mugling Highway. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  42. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ganser A (1964) Geology of the Himalaya. Inter Science John Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gupta RP, Joshi BC (1990) Landslide hazard zonation using the GIS approach—a case study from the Ramganga Catchment, Himalayas. Eng Geol 28:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81:166–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hagen T (1969) Report on the geological survey of Nepal preliminary reconnaissance: Zürich, Mémoires de la soc. Helvétique des sci. naturelles, p 185Google Scholar
  50. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85:347–366Google Scholar
  51. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Gupta RP, Sarkar S (2008) Landslide risk assessment using danger pixel and fuzzy concepts in Darjeeling Himalayas. Landslides 5:407–416Google Scholar
  52. Kolat C, Doyuran V, Ayday C, Suzen LM (2006) Preparation of a geotechnical microzonation model using geographical information systems based on multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 87 (3–4):241–255Google Scholar
  53. Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee S (2007a) Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps generated through multiple logistic regression for three test areas in Korea. Earth Surf Proc & Landf 32:2133–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee S (2007b) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52:615–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2006) The application of artificial neural networks to landslide susceptibility mapping at Janghung, Korea. Mathematical Geol 38:199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee S, Pradhan B (2006) Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia. J Earth Syst Sci 115(6):661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mancini F, Ceppi C, Ritrovato G (2010) GIS and statistical analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Daunia area, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1851–1864Google Scholar
  60. Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2007) Weights of evidence modeling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi valley, Uttarakhand. Curr Sci 92(5):628–638Google Scholar
  61. Melchiorre C, Matteucci M, Azzoni A, Zanchi A (2008) Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation. Geomorphology 94:379–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mohammady M, Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models. J Asian Earth Sci 61:221–236. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005
  63. Moore ID, Grayson RB (1991) Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resour Res 27(6):1171–1191Google Scholar
  64. Muthu K, Petrou M, Tarantino C, Blonda P (2008) Landslide possibility mapping using fuzzy approaches. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 46(4):1253–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nagarajan R, Roy A, Vinod Kumar R, Mukherjee A, Khire MV (2000) Landslide hazard susceptibility mapping based on terrain and climatic factors for tropical monsoon regions. Bull Eng Geol Env 58:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nefeslioglu H, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir A, Duman T (2010a) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010:Article ID 901095. doi:10.1155/2010/901095
  67. Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir AS, Duman TY (2010b) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012:1–15. doi:10.1155/2010/901095
  68. Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 7(9):1264–1276. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3–4):331–343Google Scholar
  71. Oyagi N (1984) Landslides in weathered rocks and residuals soils in Japan an surrounding areas: state-of-the-art report. 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto, pp 1–131Google Scholar
  72. Pantha BR, Yatabe R, Bhandari NP (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation for roadside slope repair and maintenance in the Himalayan region. Episodes 31(4):384–291Google Scholar
  73. Poudyal CP, Chang C, Oh HJ, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61:1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2012a) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed Iran. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7
  75. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Deylami Moezzi K (2012b) A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster–Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. doi:10.1080/19475705.2012.662915
  76. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012c) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards 63(2):965–996. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2
  77. Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012d) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pourghasemi HR, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B, Deylami Moezzi K (2012e) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran. In: Pradhan B, Buchroithner M (eds) Terrigenous mass movements. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–49. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25495-6-2
  79. Pourghasemi HR, Goli Jirandeh A, Pradhan B, Xu C, Gokceoglu C (2012f) Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS. J Earth Syst Sci 61(15):221–236Google Scholar
  80. Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012g) Remote sensing data derived parameters and its use in landslide susceptibility assessment using Shannon’s entropy and GIS. Appl Mech Mater 225:486–491Google Scholar
  81. Pradhan B (2010a) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45:1244–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pradhan B (2010b) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. Int J Comput Intell Syst 3:370–381Google Scholar
  83. Pradhan B (2010c) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pradhan B (2012) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023
  85. Pradhan B (2011a) Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with geoinformation techniques for landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 18(3):471–493. doi:10.1007/s10651-010-0147-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pradhan B (2011b) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pradhan B, Singh RP, Buchroithner MF (2006) Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data. Adv Space Res 37:698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. I J Physical Sci 3(11):1–15Google Scholar
  89. Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):107–126Google Scholar
  90. Pradhan B, Pirasteh S (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3(2):26–34Google Scholar
  91. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 60:1037–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010a) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinformation (PFG) 1(1):17–32Google Scholar
  94. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010b) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ & Urban Syst 34:216–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J, Buchroithner MF (2012) Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess 184(2):715–727. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-1996-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Regmi AD, Yoshida K, Dhital MR, Devkota K (2012a) Effect of rock weathering, clay mineralogy, and geological structures in the formation of large landslide, a case study from Dumre Besei landslide, Lesser Himalaya Nepal. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-011-0311-7
  97. Regmi AD, Yoshida K, Nagata H, Pradhan AMS, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR (2012b) The relationship between geology and rock weathering on the rock instability along Mugling–Narayanghat road corridor, Central Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0497-6
  98. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010a) Assessing susceptibility to landslides: using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology 112:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010b) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Saito H, Nakayama D, Matsuyama H (2009) Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: the Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology 109:108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora KM, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sharma M, Kumar R (2008) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation: a case study from the Parwanoo area, Lesser and Outer Himalaya, H.P., India. B Eng Geol Environ 67:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stöcklin J (1980) Geology of Nepal and its regional frame. J Geol Soc London 137:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stöcklin J, Bhattarai KD (1978) Geology of the Kathmandu area and central Mahabharat range, Nepal Himalaya. Unpublished Report of the Department of Mines and Geology/UNDP, 86 pGoogle Scholar
  107. Upreti BN (1999) An overview of the stratigraphy and tectonics of the Nepal Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 17:577–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36(29):1101–1114Google Scholar
  109. van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ, Soeters R (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS based hazard zonation. Geol Rundsch 86:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. van Westen CJ, Seijmonsbergen AC, Mantovani F (1999) Comparing landslide hazard maps. Nat Hazards 20(2/3):137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wan S (2009) A spatial decision support system for extracting the core factors and thresholds for landslide susceptibility map. Eng Geol 108:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wan S, Lei TC, Huang PC, Chou TY (2008) Knowledge rules of debris flow event: a case study for investigation ChenYu Lan River Taiwan. Eng Geol 98:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wan S, Lei TC (2009) A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River, Taiwan. Knowl Based Syst 2(8):580–588Google Scholar
  115. Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2009) Anovel data mining technique of analysis and classification for landslide problems. Nat Hazards 52:211–230Google Scholar
  116. Xiao CC, Tian Y, Shi WZ, Guo QH, Wu L (2010) A new method of pseudo absence data generation in landslide susceptibility mapping with a case study of Shenzhen. Sci China Tech Sci 53(1):75–84. doi:10.1007/s11431-010-3219-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101(4):572–582Google Scholar
  118. Yeon YK, Han JG, Ryu KH (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using decision tree. Eng Geol 116:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yilmaz I (2009a) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. B Eng Geol Environ 68:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Yilmaz I (2009b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Yilmaz I (2010a) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yilmaz I (2010b) The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 60:505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zhu C, Wang X (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of information and weights-of evidence methods in Three Gorges Area. Int Conf Environ Sci Inf Appl Technol 2009:342–346. doi:10.1109/ESIAT.2009.187 Google Scholar
  124. Zare M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amar Deep Regmi
    • 1
  • Krishna Chandra Devkota
    • 2
  • Kohki Yoshida
    • 1
  • Biswajeet Pradhan
    • 3
  • Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    • 4
  • Takashi Kumamoto
    • 5
  • Aykut Akgun
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Geology, Faculty of ScienceShinshu UniversityMatsumotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of GeologyKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.Geospatial Information Science Research Centre (GISRC), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  4. 4.College of Natural Resources and Marine SciencesTarbiat Modares University (TMU)MazandaranIran
  5. 5.Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty ScienceOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan
  6. 6.Geological Engineering DepartmentBlack Sea Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations