Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 6, Issue 12, pp 4993–5006 | Cite as

Probabilities of earthquake occurrences in Mainland Southeast Asia

  • Santi Pailoplee
  • Montri Choowong
Original Paper

Abstract

The frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes are used in this study to estimate the earthquake hazard parameters for individual earthquake source zones within the Mainland Southeast Asia. For this purpose, 13 earthquake source zones are newly defined based on the most recent geological, tectonic, and seismicity data. A homogeneous and complete seismicity database covering the period from 1964 to 2010 is prepared for this region and then used for the estimation of the constants, a and b, of the frequency–magnitude distributions. These constants are then applied to evaluate the most probable largest magnitude, the mean return period, and the probability of earthquake of different magnitudes in different time spans. The results clearly show that zones A, B, and E have the high probability for the earthquake occurrence comparing with the other seismic zones. All seismic source zones have 100 % probability that the earthquake with magnitude ≤6.0 generates in the next 25 years. For the Sagaing Fault Zone (zones C), the next Mw 7.2–7.5 earthquake may generate in this zone within the next two decades and should be aware of the prospective Mw 8.0 earthquake. Meanwhile, in Sumatra-Andaman Interplate (zone A), an earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 9.0 can possibly occur in every 50 years. Since an earthquake of magnitude Mw 9.0 was recorded in this region in 2004, there is a possibility of another Mw 9.0 earthquake within the next 50 years.

Keywords

Earthquake probability Earthquake catalogue Frequency–magnitude distribution Return periods Mainland Southeast Asia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was jointly sponsored by Integrated Innovation Academic Center: IIAC Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project (CU56-CC04), the Higher Education Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission (CC508B). Thanks also extend to T. Pailoplee for the preparation of the draft manuscript. We thank the Publication Counseling Unit (PCU), the faculty of science, Chulalongkorn University for a critical review and improved the English. We acknowledged thoughtful comments and suggestions by the Editor-In-Chief and anonymous reviewers which enhanced the quality of this manuscript significantly.

References

  1. Alves EI (2006) Earthquake forecasting using neural networks: results and future work. Nonlinear Dynamics 44:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand G, Rangin C (2003) Tectonics of the western margin of the Shan Plateau (central Myanmar): implications for the India-Indochina oblique convergence since the Oligocene. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 21:1139–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodri B (2001) A neural-network model for earthquake occurrence. J Geodyn 32:289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bott J, Wong I, Prachaub S, Wechbunthung B, Hinthong C, Sarapirome S (1997) Contemporary seismicity in northern Thailand and its tectonic implication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Stratigraphy and Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Asia and the South Pacific, Department of Mineral Resources, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 453–464Google Scholar
  5. Brown JC, Leicester P (1933) The Pyu earthquake of 3rd and 4th December, 1930 and subsequent Burma earthquakes up to January 1932. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India 42(1):1–140Google Scholar
  6. Caceres D, Kulhanek O (2000) Seismic Hazard of Honduras. Nat Hazard 22:49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charusiri P, Daorerk V, Choowong M, Muangnoicharoen N, Won-in K, Lumjuan A, Kosuwan S, Saithong P, Thonnarat P (2004) The study on the investigations of active faults in Changwat Kanchanaburi area, western Thailand. Technical Report, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai with English abstract)Google Scholar
  8. Charusiri P, Choowong M, Charoentitirat T, Jankaew K, Chutakositkanon V, Kanjanapayont P (2005) Geological and physical effect evaluation in the tsunami damage area for restoration and warning system. Technical Report, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University (in Thai with English abstract)Google Scholar
  9. Cuong NQ, Zuchiewicz WA (2001) Morphotectonic properties of the Lo River Fault near Tam Dao in North Vietnam. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 1:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duong CC, Feigl KL (1999) Geodetic measurement of horizontal strain across the Red River fault near Thac Ba, Vietnam. J Geod 73:298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eleftheria P, Xueze W, Vassilios K, Xueshen J (2004) Earthquake Triggering along the Xianshuihe fault zone of Western Sichuan, China. Pure Appl Geophys 161(8):1683–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenton CH, Charusiri P, Wood SH (2003) Recent paleoseismic investigations in Northern and Western Thailand. Ann Geophys 46(5):957–981Google Scholar
  13. Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(1):363–367Google Scholar
  14. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermann RE (1991) Seismicity rate variations and systematic changes in magnitudes in teleseismic catalogs. Tectonophysics 193:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermann RE, Creamer F (1994) Catalog errors and the M8 earthquake prediction algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 84:1551–1559Google Scholar
  17. Ishimoto M, Iida K (1939) Observations sur les seismes enregistres parle microsismographe construit dernierement. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 17:443–478 (in Japanese with French abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82:2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khana PK, Chakraborty PP (2005) Two-phase opening of Andaman Sea: a new seismotectonic insight. Earth Planet Sci Lett 229:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klaipongphan S, Chakramanont V, Pinrode J, Chittrakarn P (1991) Geological and seismicity evaluation. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1357–1363Google Scholar
  21. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  22. Lacassin R, Replumaz A, Leloup PH (1998) Hairpin river loops and strike-slip sense inversion of Southeast Asian strike-slip faults. Geology 26:703–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Le Dain AY, Tapponnier P, Molnar P (1984) Active faulting and tectonics of Burma and surrounding regions. J Geophys Res 89:453–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maryanto S, Mulyana I (2008) Temporal change of fractal dimension of explosion earthquakes and harmonic tremors at Semeru Volcano, East Java, Indonesia, using critical exponent method. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 42:537–541Google Scholar
  25. Molnar P, Deng Q (1984) Faulting associated with large earthquakes and the average rate of deformation in Central and Eastern Asia. J Geophys Res 89:6203–6227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nutalaya P, Sodsri S, Arnold EP (1985) Series on seismology. Volume II. Thailand. In: Arnold, EP (Ed.), Southeast Asia Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  27. Nuttee R, Charusiri P, Takashima I, Kosuwan S (2005) Paleo-earthquakes along the southern segment of the Sri Sawat Fault. Morphotectonic and TL-dating evidences. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geology, Geotechnology and Mineral Resources of Indochina, Khon Kaen, Thailand, Kanchanaburi, Western Thailand, pp 542–554Google Scholar
  28. Pailoplee S, Sugiyama Y, Charusiri P (2009) Deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analyses in Thailand and adjacent areas using active fault data. Earth Planets Space 61:1313–1325Google Scholar
  29. Pailoplee S, Sugiyama Y, Charusiri P (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in Thailand and adjacent areas by using regional seismic source zones. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences 21(5):757–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palasri C (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of Thailand. M.S. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul J, Burgmann R, Gaur VK, Bilham R, Larson KM, Ananda MB, Jade S, Mukal M, Anupama TS, Satyal G, Kumar D (2001) The motion and active deformation of India. Geophys Res Lett 28:647–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phoung NH (1991) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Vietnam based on seismotectonic regionalization. Tectonophysics 198:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Polachan S, Pradidtan S, Tongtaow C, Janmaha S, Intrawijitr K, Sangsuwan C (1991) Development of Cenozoic basins in Thailand. Mar Pet Geol 8:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajendran CP, Earnest A, Rajendran K, Das DR, Kesavan S (2003) The 13th September 2002 north Andaman (Diglipur) earthquake: an analysis in the context of regional seismicity. Curr Sci 84(7):919–924Google Scholar
  35. Reading HG (1980) Characteristics and recognition of strike-slip fault system. Spec Publ Int Ass Sediment 4:7–26Google Scholar
  36. Rhodes BP, Charusiri P, Kosuwan S, Lamjuan A (2005) Tertiary evolution of the Three Pagodas Fault, Western Thailand. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geology, Geotechnology and Mineral Resources of Indochina, Khon Kaen, Thailand, pp 498–505Google Scholar
  37. Rhodes BP, Perez R, Lamjuan A, Kosuwan S (2004) Kinematics and tectonic implications of the Mae Kuang Fault, northern Thailand. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 24(1):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Royal Irrigation Department (RID) (2006) Active fault investigation in Mae Yom fault zone, Kaeng Seur Ten Dam Site, Song district, Phrae Province, Thailand. Technical Report, Royal Irrigation Department, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai with English abstract)Google Scholar
  39. Shanker D, Singh VP (1997) Seismic risk analysis for the occurrence of medium size earthquakes in Kangraregion of Himachal Pradesh, India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 63(A2):197–202Google Scholar
  40. Takemoto K, Halim N, Otofuji Y, Tran VT, Le VD, Hada S (2005) New paleomagnetic constraints on the extrusion of Indochina: Late Cretaceous results from the Song Da terrane, northern Vietnam. Earth Planet Sci Lett 229:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tun ST (2008) Active faults in the Central Myanmar basin. Proceedings of the International Symposia on Geosciences Resources and Environments of Asian Terranes Bangkok, Thailand, p 63 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  42. Udchachon M, Charusiri P, Daorerk V, Won-in K, Takashima I (2005) Paleo-seismic studies along the southeastern portion of the Phrae Basin, Northern Thailand. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geology, Geotechnology and Mineral Resources of Indochina, Khon Kaen, Thailand, pp 511–519Google Scholar
  43. Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:684–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wong I, Fenton C, Dober M, Zachariasen J, Terra F (2005) Seismic hazard evaluation of the Tha Sae project, Thailand. Technical Report, Punya Consultants Co. LtdGoogle Scholar
  45. Yadav RBS (2009) Seismotectonic modeling of NW Himalaya: a perspective on future seismic hazard. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Earthquake Engineering, IIT Roorkee, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  46. Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:939–964Google Scholar
  47. Zuchiewicz W, Cuong NQ, Bluszcz A, Michalik M (2004) Quaternary sediments in the Dien Bien Phu fault zone, NW Vietnam: a record of young tectonic processes in the light of OSL-SAR dating results. Geomorphology 60:269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zuniga FR, Wiemer S (1999) Seismicity patterns: are they always related to natural causes? Pure Appl Geophys 155:713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earthquake and Tectonic Geology Research Unit (EATGRU), Department of Geology, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations