Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 6, Issue 11, pp 4357–4362 | Cite as

Prediction of sawing performance based on index properties of rocks

  • Fatih BayramEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Performance analysis of all systems used in industrial production is very important subject in terms of capturing the low production cost. This subject is also important for choosing production methods in natural stone processing. Circular sawing is a commonly used method in natural stone processing. The preliminary prediction of circular sawing performance is very useful for stone producers. In this study, the prediction of sawing performance from some index properties of stones was conducted. The unit wear on diamond segments was evaluated as performance criteria. The statistical analysis was carried out, and this performance parameter was predicted from some index properties including cone indenter hardness, Shore hardness, Böhme surface abrasion, and brittleness. The most suitable prediction equation derived from regression analysis was selected. It was determined that this equation was statistically reliable for prediction of unit wear for natural stone processing.

Keywords

Natural stone Circular sawing Unit wear Index properties Regression analysis 

References

  1. Altindag R (2008) Relationships between brittleness and specific energy in excavation mechanics. International Proceedings of 9th Regional Rock Mechanics Symposium, İzmir, Turkey, pp 437–451Google Scholar
  2. Brook B (2002) Principles of diamond tool technology for sawing rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buyuksagis IS (2007) Effect of cutting mode on the sawability of granites using segmented circular diamond sawblade. J Mater Process Technol 183:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buyuksagis IS (2010) The effects of circular sawblade diamond segment characteristics on marble processing performance. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec 224:1559–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buyuksagis IS, Goktan RM (2005) Investigation of marble machining performance using an instrumented block-cutter. J Mater Process Technol 169:258–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassapi VB, Unver B, Singh RN (1987) Statistical assessment of sawability of rocks. A special report to De BeersGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado NS, Rey AR, Suarez del Rio LM, Sarria ID, Calleja L, Argandona VGR (2005) The influence of rock microhardness on the sawability of Pink Porrino Granite (Spain). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:161–166Google Scholar
  8. Ersoy A, Atici U (2004) Performance characteristics of circular diamond saws in cutting different types of rocks. Diam Relat Mater 13:22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ersoy A, Buyuksagis IS, Atici U (2005) Wear characteristics of circular diamond saws in the cutting of different hard and abrasive rocks. Wear 258:1422–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ertingshausen W (1985) Wear process in sawing hard stone. Ind Diamond Rev 5:254–258Google Scholar
  11. Eyuboglu AS, Ozcelik Y, Kulaksiz S, Engin IC (2003) Statistical and microscopic investigation of disc segment wear related to sawing Ankara andesites. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 40:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guney A (2011) Performance prediction of large-diameter circular saws based on surface hardness tests for Mugla (Turkey) marbles. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilio AD, Togna A (2003) A theoretical wear model for diamond tools in stone cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:1171–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Compilation arranged by the ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) Turkish National Group. ISRM, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahraman S, Gunaydin O (2008) Indentation hardness test to estimate the sawability of carbonate rocks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Konstanty J (2000) Diamond bonding and matrix wear mechanisms involved in circular sawing of stone. Ind Diamond Rev 60:55–65Google Scholar
  17. Konstanty J (2002) Theoretical analysis of stone sawing with diamonds. J Mater Process Technol 123:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Huang H, Shen JY, Xu XP, Gao YS (2002) Cost-effective machining of granite by reducing tribological interactions. J Mater Process Technol 129:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo SY (1996) Characteristics of diamond sawblade wear in sawing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 6:661–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo SY (1997) Investigation of the worn surfaces of diamond saw blades in sawing granite. J Mater Process Technol 70:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo SY, Liao YS (1995) Study of the behavior of diamond saw-blades in stone processing. J Mater Process Technol 51:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NCB (1977) NCB cone indenter. Mining Research and Development Establishment (MRDE) handbook no. 5. NCB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Pai DM (1987) A fundamentals study of the diamond sawing of rocks. Ph.D. Thesis. Arizona State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. Polini W, Turchetta S (2005) Evaluation of diamond tool wear. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 26:959–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polini W, Turchetta S (2007) Monitoring of diamond disk wear in stone cutting by means of force or acceleration sensors. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 35:454–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sengun N, Altindag R (2012) Prediction of specific energy of carbonate rock in industrial stones cutting process. Arab J Geosci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0429-x
  27. TSE (1981) Methods of testing for natural building stones (TS 699). TSE Publication, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  28. Ucun I, Aslantas K, Buyuksagis IS, Tasgetiren S (2011) An investigation on the effect of diamond concentration and matrix material composition in the circular sawing process of granites. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec 225:17–27Google Scholar
  29. Wei X, Wang CY, Zhou ZH (2003) Study on the fuzzy ranking of granite sawability. J Mater Process Technol 139:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wright DN, Cassapi VB (1985) Factors influencing stone sawability. Ind Diamond Rev 2:84–87Google Scholar
  31. Wright DN, Tagg WRJ (1998) The development of a rock classification system for use with diamond tools. Ind Diamond Rev 58:113–120Google Scholar
  32. Xu X (1999) Friction studies on the process in circular sawing of granites. Tribol Lett 7:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu X, Li Y, Yu Y (2003) Force ratio in the circular sawing of granites with a diamond segmented blade. J Mater Process Technol 139:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey

Personalised recommendations