Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 6, Issue 8, pp 2829–2842 | Cite as

An integrated GIS and hydrochemical approach to assess groundwater contamination in West Ismailia area, Egypt

  • Mohamed O. ArnousEmail author
  • Ahmed E. El-Rayes
Original Paper


Groundwater is a very important resource across Ismailia area as it is used in domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes. This makes it absolutely necessary that the effects of land use change on groundwater resources are considered when making land use decisions. Careful monitoring of groundwater resource helps minimize the contamination of this resource. This study developed a GIS-based model to assess groundwater contamination in the West Ismailia area based on its hydrochemical characteristics. The model incorporated five different factors which are standardized to a common evaluation scale. The produced factor maps include the depth to the water table, the potential recharge, the soil type, the topography, and the thickness of saturation. These maps are combined in ERDAS Imagine, ARC INFO, and ARC GIS software using geostatistics and a weighted overlay process to produce the final groundwater potential risk map. The model output is then used to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination by domestic, agricultural, and industrial sources. The produced risk maps are then combined with the groundwater contamination potentiality map using an arithmetic overlay in order to identify areas which were vulnerable to contamination. The results of this study revealed that the groundwater is highly vulnerable to contamination that may result from the inappropriate application of agrichemicals and domestic and industrial activities. The produced integrated potential contamination maps are very useful tools for a decision maker concerned with groundwater protection and development.


Geospatial Geostatistics Hydrochemistry Land use/land cover Groundwater contamination assessment 


  1. Afify HF (2004) Municipal contamination of water resources at some villages of Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. PhD thesis, Geology Department, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Adamat RAN, Foster IDL, Baban SMJ (2003) Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq Basin of Jordan using GIS, remote sensing and DRASTIC. Appl Geogr 23:303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydro geologic settings. USEPA document no. EPA/600/2-85-018Google Scholar
  4. Anbazhagan S, Nair AM (2005) Geographic information system and groundwater quality mapping in Panvel Basin, Maharashtra, India. Environ Geol 45(6):753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JR, Harday EE, Roach JT, Witmer WE (1976) Land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensing data. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, Reston, Virginia, 964, pp 138–145Google Scholar
  6. Anderson EL, Chrostowski PC, Vreeland JL (1990) Risk assessment for use in groundwater management. In: McTernan WF, Kaplan E (eds) Risk assessment for groundwater pollution control. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 111–125Google Scholar
  7. Arnous MO (2004) Geo-environmental assessment of Cairo–Ismailia road area, Egypt, using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS). PhD thesis, Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 283 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnous MO, Sidi Cheikh MA, Mongi BZ, Aliout R, Hadj-Ali R, Garouni Y, Sid S, Marini A, Muntoni F (2009) Remote sensing technology applications for desertification mapping: a case study, Oudia Area, Tunisia, desertification and risk analysis using high and medium resolution satellite data. NATO Sci Peace Secur Ser C Environ Secur 2009(2):183–197. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8937-4_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnous MO, Aboulela HA, Green DR (2011) Geo-environmental hazards assessment of the north western Gulf of Suez, Egypt. J Coast Conserv 15(1):37–50. doi: 10.1007/s11852-010-0118-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atteia O, Dubois JP, Webster R (1994) Geostatistical analysis of soil contamination in the Swiss Jura. Environ Pollut 86:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baalousha HM (2010) Mapping groundwater contamination risk using GIS and groundwater modelling. A case study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Arab J Geosci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-010-0135-0
  12. Bartels C, Beurden A (1998) Using geographic principles for environmental assessment and risk mapping. J Hazard Mater 61:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlon C, Critto A, Marcomini A, Nathanail P (2001) Risk based characterisation of contaminated industrial site using multivariate and geostatistical tools. Environ Pollut 111:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee R, Gourab Tarafder G, Paul S (2010) Groundwater quality assessment of Dhanbad district, Jharkhand, India. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Lambin E (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens 25:1565–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniela D (1997) GIS techniques for mapping groundwater contamination risk. Nat Hazard 20(2–3):279–294Google Scholar
  17. Davis J (2002) Statistics and data analysis in geology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, 638 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Ducci D (1999) GIS techniques for mapping groundwater contamination risk. Nat Hazards 20:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eason A, Tim US, Wang X (2000) Integrated modeling environment for statewide assessment of groundwater vulnerability from pesticide use in agriculture. 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects and Research Needs. Banff, Alberta, Canada, GIS/EM4 No. 182Google Scholar
  21. EHCW (Egyptian Higher Committee of Water) (1995) Egyptian standards for drinking and domestic water according to the Act 27/1978 in regulating of the public water supplies. Egyptian Governmental Press, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  22. El-Alfy M, Merkel B (2006) Hydrochemical relationships and geochemical modeling of ground water in El-Arish area, north Sinai, Egypt. Hydrol Sci Technol 22(1–4):47–62, ISSN 0887-686XGoogle Scholar
  23. El-Fawal FM (1992) Quaternary sedimentology west of the Suez Canal. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Geology. Sinai Develop., Ismailia, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  24. El-Fayoumy IF (1968) Geology of groundwater supplies in the region east of the Nile Delta and its extension in north Sinai. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, Geology Department, Cairo University, Egypt, 207 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. El-Rayes AE, Shendi EH, Geriesh MH, Afify HF (2004) Contamination and treatment model of domestic water supplies of Ismailia District, Ismailia, Egypt. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Geology of Sinai for Development Ismailia, Egypt, pp 69–80Google Scholar
  26. El-Shamy IZ, Geriesh MH (1991) Hydrogeology of west Ismailia area, Egypt. Desert Inst Bull 42(2):271–288Google Scholar
  27. El-Shazly EM, Abd El-Hady MA, El-Shazly MM, El-Kassas IA, El-Ghawaby MA, Salman AB, Morsi MA (1975) Geology and groundwater potential studies of El Ismailia master plan study area. Remote Sensing Research Project, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  28. ESRI (1995) Cell-based modelling with grid. On-line computer help system. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  29. ESRI (2001) ArcGIS™ Spatial Analyst: advanced GIS spatial analysis using raster and vector data. ESRI, Redlands, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  30. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, USA) (1998) Using the arcinfo kriging technique to interpolate groundwater quality in KwaZulu/Natal, South Africa.
  31. Facchinelli A, Sacchi E, Mallen L (2001) Multivariate statistical and GIS-based approach to identify heavy metal sources in soils. Environ Pollut 114:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farnham I, Stetzenbach K, Singh A, Johannesson K (2000) Deciphering groundwater flow systems in Oasis Valley, Nevada, using trace element geochemistry, multivariate statistics, and geographical information system. Math Geol 32:943–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fritch TG, McKnight CL, Yelderman JC, Arnold JG (2000) Environmental auditing: an aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy Aquifer, Central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. J Environ Manag 25(3):337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geriesh MH (1989) Hydrogeological investigation of west Ismailia area. MSc thesis, Suez Canal University, Egypt, 120 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Geriesh MH (1994) Hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater resources in the Suez Canal region. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Geriesh MH, El-Rayes AE (2001) Municipal contamination of shallow groundwater beneath south Ismailia Villages. 5th International Conference on Geochemistry. Alexandria University, Egypt, pp 241–253Google Scholar
  37. Ghodeif KO, Arnous MO, Geriesh MH (2011) Define a protected buffer zone for Ismailia Canal, Egypt using geographic information systems. Arab J Geosci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0326-3
  38. Goossens R, Ranst EV (1998) The use of remote sensing to map gypsiferous soils in the Ismailia Province (Egypt). Geoderma 87:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goossens R, De Dapper M, De Vliegher BM (1994) A model to simulate and predict soil salinity and waterlogging (Elaborated for the Nile Delta fringes, Egypt). IEEE Xplore, pp 773–775Google Scholar
  40. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 483 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Haimes YY (1984) Risk assessment for the prevention of groundwater contamination. In: Groundwater contamination, National Research Council (U.S.). Geophysics Study Committee, Geophysics Research Forum (U.S.). Geophysics Study Committee, National Academy Press, Washington, D C, pp 166–177Google Scholar
  42. Helsel DR (1990) Less than obvious: statistical treatment of data below the detection limit. Environ Sci Technol 24(12):1766–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hong IA, Chon HT (1999) Assessment of groundwater contamination using geographic information systems. Environ Geochem Heal 21(3):273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 561 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Khalifa IH, Arnous MO (2010) Assessment of hazardous mine waste transport in west central Sinai, using remote sensing and GIS approaches: a case study of Um Bogma area, Egypt. Arab J Geosci. doi: 10.1007/s12517-010-0196-0
  46. Lopiano KK, Young LJ, Gotway CA (2011) A comparison of errors in variables methods for use in regression models with spatially misaligned data. Stat Methods Med Res 20:29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGrath D, Zhang C, Carton OT (2004) Geostatistical analyses and hazard assessment on soil lead in Silvermines area, Ireland. Environ Pollut 127:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Michalak WZ (1993) GIS in land use change analysis: integration of remotely sensed data into GIS. Appl Geogr 13(1):28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mimi Z, Assi A (2009) Intrinsic vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping for karst aquifers: a case study. J Hydrol 364:298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell A (2005) The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, volume2: spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press, 252 ppGoogle Scholar
  52. Morris B, Foster S (1998) Cryptosporidium contamination hazard assessment and risk management for British groundwater sources. Water Sci Technol 41:67–77Google Scholar
  53. Olea RA (1991) Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary. Oxford University Press, New York, 177 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Pandey PK, Khare RN, Sharma R, Sar SK, PandeyM BP (1999) Arsenicosis and deteriorating groundwater quality: unfolding crisis in central-east Indian region. Curr Sci 77:686–693Google Scholar
  55. Praharaja T, Swaina SP, Powellb MA, Hartb BR, Tripathya S (2002) Delineation of groundwater contamination around an ash pond: geochemical and GIS approach. Environ Int 27:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Satapathy DR, Salve PR, Katpatal YB (2009) Spatial distribution of metals in ground/surface waters in the Chandrapur district (Central India) and their plausible sources. Environ Geol 56(7):1323–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shu T (1995) Kriging and mapping of copper, lead, and mercury contents in surface soil in Shenzhen area. Water Air Soil Pollut 83(1–2):161–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00482601 Google Scholar
  59. Singh DSH, Lawrence JF (2007) Groundwater quality assessment of shallow aquifer using geographical information system in part of Chennai city Tamilnadu. J Geol Soc India 69:1067–1076Google Scholar
  60. Singh AK, Mondal GC, Singh S, Singh PK, Singh TB, Tewary BK, Sinha A (2007) Aquatic geochemistry of Dhanbad, Jharkhand: source evaluation and quality assessment. J Geol Soc India 69:1088–1102Google Scholar
  61. Suk H, Lee K (1999) Characterization of a ground water hydrochemical system through multivariate analysis: clustering into ground water zones. Ground Water 37:358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swanson S, Bahr J, Schwar M, Potter K (2001) Two-way cluster analysis of geochemical data to constrain spring source waters. Chem Geol 179:73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tao S (1995) Kriging and mapping of copper, lead and mercury contents in surface soil in Shenzhen area. Water Air Soil Pollut 83:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waller LA, Gotway CA (2004) Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Wiley, New York, 520 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2010) Guidelines for drinking water quality recommendation. Incorporating first and second addenda to third edition. World Health Organisation Report, Geneva; Volume 1: RecommendationsGoogle Scholar
  67. Zheng M, Wang Y, Xie J, Wu J, Li J, Peng J, Song J (2011) Changes of spatial distributions in copper and lead in Shenzhen surface soil over a 20-year period. Environ Earth Sci 64:151–156. doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0831-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceSuez Canal UniversityIsmailiaEgypt

Personalised recommendations