Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 101–108 | Cite as

Evaluation of hydrogeochemical parameters and quality assessment of the groundwater in Kottur blocks, Tiruvarur district, Tamilnadu, India

  • Thirunavukkarasu Ramkumar
  • Senapathi Venkatramanan
  • Irudhayanathan Anithamary
  • Sheik Mohamed Syed Ibrahim
Original Paper

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the water quality of Kottur block, Thiruvarur district, Tamilnadu. Groundwater samples from hand pumps and tube wells of 16 stations were analyzed during postmonsoon and premonsoon (2008) with the help of standard methods of APHA (1995). Dominance of cations are in the following order Na>Ca>K>Mg and Cl>SO4>HCO3>NO3 by anions in both the seasons. The analytical results shows higher concentration of total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, sodium, chloride, and sulfate which indicate signs of deterioration but values of pH, calcium, magnesium, and nitrate are within permissible limit as per World Health Organization standards. From the Piper trilinear diagram, it is observed that the majority of groundwater samples are Na-Cl and Ca-Mg-SO4 facies clearly indicates seawater incursion. In Wilcox diagram, most of the samples fall in low to very high sodium hazard and low to very high salinity hazard indicates moderately suitable for agricultural activities. Kelly’s ratio and magnesium ratio indicates most of the samples fall in suitable for irrigation purpose.

Keywords

Groundwater chemistry Piper trilinear diagram Wilcox diagram Kelly ratio Magnesium ratio 

References

  1. Anithamary, I (2008) Hydrogeochemical and environmental geochemistry of water in Kodiakarai region—coastal zone of Tamilnadu. Published M. Phil thesis. Annamalai University. Annamalainagar, Chidambaram 38Google Scholar
  2. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 19th edn. NewYork, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannerman RR (1994) Appraisal of the limestone aquifer of the Keta Basin, Ghana. In: Soveri J, Suokko T (eds) Future groundwater resources at risk. Publ. 222. International Association for Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, pp 315–321Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1991) Indian standard specification for drinking water, IS 10500. 24Google Scholar
  5. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey, p 604Google Scholar
  6. Garrels A (1976) Survey of low temperature water mineral relations. In: Interpretation of environmental isotope and hydrogeochemical data in groundwater hydrology, pp. 65–84. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  7. Helstrup T, Jorgensen NO, Banoeng-Yakubo B (2007) Investigation of hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater from the Cretaceous–Eocene limestone in southern Ghana and southern Togo using hierarchical cluster analysis. Hydrogeology 15:977–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jorgensen NO, Banoeng-Yakubo BK (2001) Environmental isotopes (18O, 2 H, and 87Sr/86Sr) as a tool in groundwater investigations in the Keta Basin, Ghana. Hydrogeology 9:190–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelley (1997) Heterogeneities in groundwater geochemistry of in a sand aquifer beneath an irrigated field. J Hydrol 198:254Google Scholar
  10. Laluraj, Gopinath, Dineshkumar (2005) Groundwater chemistry of shallow aquifers in the coastal zones of Cochin, India. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3:133–139Google Scholar
  11. Navarro A, Carnonal ME (2007) Evaluation of groundwater contamination beneath an urban environment: the Beso’s river basin (Barcelona, Spain). J Environ Manage 85:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piper (1953) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses. Trans. US Geol Survey. Groundwater Notes, 12Google Scholar
  13. Ramkumar T, Venkatramanan S, Anita Mary I, Tamil Selvi M, Ramesh G (2010) hydrogeochemical quality of groundwater in Vedaraniyam town, Tamilnadu, India. Res J Environ Earth Sciences 2:44–48Google Scholar
  14. Tutmet, Hatipoglu, Kaymak (2006) Modeling electrical conductivity of groundwater using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Comput Geosci 32:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Venkatramanan S, Ramkumar T, Vasudevan S, Ramesh G, Anitha Mary I, Vijayakumar V (2009) Assessment of Hydrogeochemistry of groundwater in Muthupet coastal region, Tamilnadu, India. Int J Appl Environ Sci 4:169–176Google Scholar
  16. Wilcox (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, p 969Google Scholar
  17. World Health Organization (WHO) (1984) Guidelines for drinking water 1: 52–82Google Scholar
  18. Yidana SM, Banoeng-Yakubo B, Akabzaa TM (2010) Analysis of groundwater quality using multivariate and spatial analyses in the Keta basin, Ghana. J Afr Earth Sci 58:220–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thirunavukkarasu Ramkumar
    • 1
  • Senapathi Venkatramanan
    • 2
  • Irudhayanathan Anithamary
    • 2
  • Sheik Mohamed Syed Ibrahim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia
  2. 2.Research scholar, Department of Earth SciencesAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia

Personalised recommendations