Promoting professional behaviour in undergraduate medical, dental and veterinary curricula in the Netherlands: evaluation of a joint effort*

  • S.J. van Luijk
  • R.C. Gorter
  • W.N.K.A. van Mook
Onderzoek

Summary

Background:

From 2002 onwards, a nationwide working group of representatives from all medical (8), dental (3) and veterinary medicine (1) schools collaborated in order to develop and implement recommendations for teaching and assessing professional behaviour.

Aim:

The aim of this article is to describe the outcomes of this process, including hurdles encountered and challenges to be met.

Method:

By a qualitative survey, information was requested on teaching professional behaviour, assessment, instruments used, consequences of unprofessional behaviour, and faculty training.

Results:

All schools have adopted at least parts of the 2002 recommendations. Differences exist mainly in the organisational structure of teaching and assessment as well as in the assessment instruments used. In all schools a longitudinal assessment of professional behaviour was accomplished.

Conclusion:

All schools involved have made progress since 2002 with regard to teaching and assessment of professional behaviour, resulting in a shift from an instrumental to a cultural change for some schools. A stimulating factor was society’s call to focus on patient safety and therefore on assessment of unprofessional behaviour. Hurdles yet to be taken are the involvement of students in the assessment process, teacher confidence in personal assessment capacities, remediation programs and logistic and administrative support. (Luijk SJ. van, Gorter RC, Mook WNKA van. Promoting professional behaviour in undergraduate medical, dental and veterinary curricula in the Netherlands: evaluation of a joint effort. Netherlands Journal of Medical Education 2011;30(4)152–161.)

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002;77(6):502–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen JJ, Cruess S, Davidson C. Alliance between society and medicine. JAMA 2007;298 (6):670–673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Expectations and obligations: professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2008;51(4):579–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Russell TR. Quality and safety initiatives in the future practice of surgery: meeting patient demands for enhanced professionalism. Surgery Today 2009;39:739–745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75:612–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stephenson A, Higgs R, Sugerman J. Teaching professional development in medical schools. The Lancet 2001;357:867–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martimianakis MA, Maniate JM & Hodges BD. Sociological interpretations of professionalism. Med Ed 2009;43: 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hafferty FW & Castellani. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med 2010;85(2):288–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 1999;282 (9): 830–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cruess SR & Cruess RL. The cognitive base of professionalism. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR & Steinert Y (Editors), Teaching Medical Professionalism. Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baernstein A, Amies Oelschlager AE, Chang TA, Wenrich MD. Learning professionalism: perspectives of preclinical medical students. Acad Med 2009;84 (5):574–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287(2):226–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Veloski JJ, Fields SK, Boex JR, Blank LL. Measuring professionalism: A review of Studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 2005;80(4):366–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee AG, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R, Oetting TA, Abramoff M, Carter K. Teaching and assessing professionalism in ophthalmology residency training programs. Survey of Ophthalmology 2007;52(3): 300–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD. A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review. Acad Med 2009;84(5): 551–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanna E, Premi J, Turnbull J. Results of remedial continuing medical education in dyscompetent physicians. Acad Med 2000;75(2):174–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papadakis MA, Teherane A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, Veloski JJ, Hogson CS. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behaviour in medical school. N. Eng J Med 2005;353 (25):2673–2682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hauer KE, Ciccone A, Henzel TR, Katsufrakis P, Miller SH, Norcross WA, Papadakis MA, Irby DM. Acad Med 2009;84(12):1822–1832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larriviere D, Beresford HD. Professionalism in neurology: The role of law. Neurology 2008;71:1283–1288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Projectteam Consilium Abeundi. Professioneel Gedrag, onderwijs, toetsing, begeleiding en regelgeving. Uitgave van DMW/VSNU, Utrecht; 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luijk SJ van (Editor). Professional behaviour: teaching, assessing and coaching students. Final report and appendices. Mosae Libris: ISBN 90-5278-442-6; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mook NK van, Luijk SJ van, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Zwaveling JH, Schuwirth LW, Vleuten CP van der. The concepts of professionalism and professional behaviour: conflicts in both definition and learning outcomes. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2009; 20, e85–e89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Irvine D. The performance of doctors: The new professionalism. The Lancet 3 1999;(53):1174–1177.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hafferty FW, Castellani B. A sociological framing of medicine’s modern-day professionalism movement. Med Educ 2009;43:826-828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van de Camp K, Vernooy- Dassen MJ, Grol RP. How to conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Teach 2004;26(8):696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castellani B & Hafferty FW. The complexities of Medical Professionalism. In: Professionalism in Medicine, Wear D, Aultman JM (Editors) Springer 2006.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y (Editors). Teaching medical professionalism. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luijk SJ van, Smeets JGE, Smits J, Wolfhagen H, Perquin MLF. Assessing professional behaviour and the role of academic advice at the Maastricht Medical School. Med. Teacher 2000;22:168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change. Med Ed 2005;39:127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steinert Y, Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Fuks A. Faculty development as an instrument of change: a case study on teaching professionalism. Ac Med 2007;82(11): 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schaub-de Jong MA, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk M. The role of peer meetings for professional development in health science education: a qualitative analysis of reflective essays. Adv.in Health Sci Educ 2009;14:503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mook NK van, Luijk SJ van, Grave W de, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Schuwirth LW, Vleuten CP van der. Teaching and learning professional behavior in practice. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2009;20, e105–e111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn, Stafleu van Loghum 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.J. van Luijk
    • 1
  • R.C. Gorter
    • 2
  • W.N.K.A. van Mook
    • 3
  1. 1.VU Medisch CentrumAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Academisch Centrum voor TandheelkundeAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.afdeling Intensive Care en Interne GeneeskundeMaastricht Universitair Medisch CentrumMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations