Advertisement

Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 121–142 | Cite as

De invloed van compatibiliteit tussen patiënt en behandeling op de effectiviteit van de therapeut

  • Michael van den BoogaardEmail author
Getoetst

Samenvatting

Non-specifieke factoren (zoals de therapeutische alliantie) komen steeds meer naar voren als de belangrijkste determinanten van het succes van de therapeut. Er zijn zelfs aanwijzingen dat de specifieke factoren, die vooral bij in de tijd gelimiteerde protocollaire behandelingen een rol spelen, meer last dan gemak veroorzaken. In dit artikel bespreken we de resultaten van een post-hocanalyse van gegevens verzameld in een gerandomiseerd onderzoek naar protocollaire behandelingen voor depressie, over de invloed van de door de therapeut bereikte compatibiliteit tussen het theoretische model van de behandeling enerzijds en de ideeën van de patiënt over zijn klachten en problemen en de daarvoor in aanmerking komende benadering anderzijds. Compatibiliteit komt daarbij naar voren als een belangrijkere voorspeller van de uitkomst dan de therapeutische alliantie.

Literatuur

  1. Ablon, J.S. & Jones, E.E. (1999). Psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 64-75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, S.J. & Hilsenroth, M.J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1-33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(3rd ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(4th ed.) Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, T., Ogles, B.M., Patterson, C.L., Lambert, M.J. & Vermeersch, D.A. (2009). Therapist effects: facilitative interpersonal skills as a predictor of therapist success. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 755-768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, D.R. & Wampold, B.E. (1982). A comparison of the Couselor Rating Form and Counselor Effectiveness Rating Scale. Counselor Education and Supervision, 22, 25-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audenhove, C. van (1995). Indicatiestelling in de psychotherapie. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 21, 182-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, P., Gjerris, A. & Andersen J., e.a. (1983). A rating scale for depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 58-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beutler, L.E., Malik, M.L., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T.M., Talebi, H., Noble, S., e.a. (2004). Therapist variables. In M.J. Lambert (red.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change(5 ed., pp. 227-306). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Bleyen, K., Vertommen, H. & Van Audenhove, C. (1998). A negotiation approach to systematic treatment selection: an evaluation of its impact on the initial phase of psychotherapy. European Journal of Psychologica Assesment, 14, 14-25.Google Scholar
  11. Boogaard, T.M. van den (2006). Een empirisch onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van indicatiestellingsprocedures. In L.Claes, P. Bijttebier, T. Vercruysse, L. Hamelinck & E. De Bruyn (red.), Tot de puzzel past(pp. 205-215). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  12. Boogaard, T.M. van den (2012). The negotiated approach in the treatment of depressive disorders; the impact on patient-treatment compatibility and outcome(proefschrift). Amsterdam, Nederland: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
  13. Boogaard, T.M. van den, Verhaak, P.F., Van, D.R. & Spinhoven, P. (2011). The impact of causal attributions on diagnosis and successful referral of depressed patients in primary care. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 1733-1740.Google Scholar
  14. Bordin, E.S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouman, T.K. & Kok, A.R. (1987). Homogeneity of Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI): applying Rasch analysis in conceptual exploration. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 76, 568-573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crits-Christoph, P. & Gallop, R. (2006). Therapist effects in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program and other psychotherapy studies. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 178-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dozois, D.J.A. & Covin, R. (2013). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Beck Scale of Suicide Ideation (BSS). In M. Hersen (red.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, personality assessment, Vol. 2(pp. 50-67). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Duncan, B.L. & Moynihan, D.W. (1994). Applying outcome research: intentional utilization of the client’s frame of references. Psychotherapy, 31, 294-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards, B.C., Lambert, M.J., Moran, P.W., McCully, T., Smith, K.C. & Ellingson, A.G. (1984). A meta-analytic comparison of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression as measures of treatment outcome. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 93-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkin, I., Falconnier, L. & Martinovich, Z. (2007). Misrepresentations in Wampold and Bolt’s critique of Elkin, Falconnier, Martinovich, and Mahoney’s study of therapist effects. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 264-267.Google Scholar
  21. Elkin, I., Falconnier, L., Martinovich, Z. & Mahoney, C. (2006). Therapist effects in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 144-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elkin, I., Yamaguchi, J.L., Arnkoff, D.B., Glass, C.R., Sotsky, S.M. & Krupnick, J.L. (1999). ‘Patient-treatment fit’ and early engagement in therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 437-451.Google Scholar
  23. Faller, H. (1998). Behandlungserwartungen bei Patienten einer psychotherapeutischer Ambulanz. Psychotherapeut, 43, 8-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garcia, C. (2008). The role of acculturation, mental health beliefs, familism, knowledge of psychotherapy, cultural competency, and ethnic match in attitudes toward seeking psychological help in Latinos (dissertation). The Brooklyn Center: Long Island University.Google Scholar
  25. Goates-Jones, M.K. (2006). Client preferences for insight-oriented and action-oriented psychotherapy(dissertation). Maryland: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  26. Godoy-Izquierdo, D., Lopez-Chicheri, I., Lopez-Torrecillas, F., Velez, M. & Godoy, J.F. (2007). Contents of lay illness models dimensions for physical and mental diseases and implications for health professionals. Patient Education and Counseling, 67, 196-213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartong, E.G. Th.M. & Goekoop, J.G. (1985). De Montgomery-Asberg beoordelingsschaal voor depressie. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 27, 657-666.Google Scholar
  28. Held, B.S. (1991). The process/content distinction in psychotherapy revisited. Psychotherapy, 28, 207-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. HIacoviello, B.M., McCarthy, K.S., Barrett, M.S., Rynn, M., Gallop, R. & Barber, J.P. (2007). Treatment preferences affect the therapeutic alliance: implications for randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 194-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hollon, S.D. (1984). System for Rating Psychotherapy Audiotapes. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  31. Horvath, A.O. (2001). The alliance. Psychotherapy, 38, 365-372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horvath, A.O. & Greenberg, L.S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jong, K. de, Moerbeek, M. & Leeden, R. van der (2010). A priori power analysis in longitudinal three-level multilevel models: an example with therapist effects. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 273-284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kendall, P.C., Holmbeck, G.N. & Verduin, T. (2004). Methodology, design, and evaluation in psychotherapy research. In M.J. Lambert (red.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change(5th ed., pp. 16-43). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  35. Kim, D.M., Wampold, B.E. & Bolt, D.M. (2006). Therapist effects in psychotherapy: a random-effects modeling of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 161-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klerman, G.L. & Weissman, M.M. (1984). Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Kolden, G.G., Chisholm-Stockard, S.M., Strauman, T.J., Tierney, S.C., Mullen, E.A. & Schneider, K.L. (2006). Universal session-level change processes in an early session of psychotherapy: path models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 327-336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kwan, B.M., Dimidjian, S. & Rizvi, S.L. (2010). Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 799-804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambert, M.J., Hatch, D.R., Kingston, M.D. & Edwards, B.C. (1986). Zung, Beck, and Hamilton Rating Scales as measures of treatment outcome: a meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 54-59.Google Scholar
  40. Lutz, W., Leon, S.C., Martinovich, Z., Lyons, J.S. & Stiles, W.B. (2007). Therapist effects in outpatient psychotherapy: a three-level growth curve approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 32-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lynch, J., Moore, M., Moss-Morris, R. & Kendrick, T. (2011). Are patient beliefs important in determining adherence to treatment and outcome for depression? Development of the beliefs about depression questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133, 29-41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manthei, R.J., Vitalo, R.L. & Ivey, A.E. (1982). The effect of client choice of therapist on therapy outcome. Community Mental Health Journal, 18, 220-229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, D.J., Garske, J.P. & Davis, M.K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mergl, R., Henkel, V., Allgaier, A.K., Kramer, D., Hautzinger, M., Kohnen, R., e.a. (2010). Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80, 39-47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montgomery, S.A. & Asberg, M. (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382-389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Okiishi, J.C., Lambert, M.J., Eggett, D., Nielsen, L., Dayton, D.D. & Vermeersch, D.A. (2006). An analysis of therapist treatment effects: toward providing feedback to individual therapists on their clients’ psychotherapy outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1157-1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prins, M.A., Verhaak, P.F., Bensing, J.M. & Meer, M.K. van der (2008). Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression: the patients’ perspective explored. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1038-1058.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raue, P.J., Schulberg, H.C., Lewis-Fernandez, R., Boutin-Foster, C., Hoffman, A.S. & Bruce, M.L. (2010). Shared decision-making in the primary care treatment of late-life major depression: a needed new intervention? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, 1101-1111.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Russell, R.L., Jones, M.E. & Miller, S.A. (2007). Core process components in psychotherapy: a synthetic review of P-technique studies. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 273-291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spitzer, R.L. & Williams, J.B.W. (1985). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Patient version (SCID-P, 7/1/85). New York: Biometrics Research Department.Google Scholar
  51. Vervaeke, G. (1995). Voorkeursdisconfirmatie in psychotherapie: de impact van de gedisconfirmeerde behandelingstheorie op tevredenheid en werkalliantie(proefschrift). Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  52. Vervaeke, G. & Vertommen, H. (1996). De werkallliantievragenlijst (WAV). Gedragstherapie, 29, 139-144.Google Scholar
  53. Wampold, B.E. & Bolt, D.M. (2006). Therapist effects: clever ways to make them (and everything else) disappear. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 184-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wampold, B.E. & Bolt, D.M. (2007). The consequences of ‘anchoring’’ in longitudinal multilevel models: Bias in the estimation of patient variability and therapist effects. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 509-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wampold, B.E. & Brown, G.S. (2005). Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: a naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 914-923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watson, J.C. & Geller, S.M. (2005). The relation among the relationship conditions, working alliance, and outcome in both process-experiential and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 15, 25-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. William, B. & Healy, D. (2001). Perceptions of illness causation among new referrals to a community mental health team: ‘explanatory model’ or ‘exploratory map’? Social Science and Medicine, 53, 465-476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wong, E.C., Beutler, L.E. & Zane, N.W. (2007). Using mediators and moderators to test assumptions underlying culturally sensitive therapies: an exploratory example. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 169-177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zane, N., Sue, S., Chang, J., Huang, L., Huang, J., Lowe, S., Srinivasan, S., Chun, K., Kurasaki, K. & Lee, E. (2005). Beyond ethnic match: effects of client-therapist cognitive match in problem perception, coping orientation, and therapy goals on treatment outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology 33, 569-585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn, Stafleu van Loghum 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations