Advertisement

Podosophia

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 26–31 | Cite as

De hardloopblessure: schoenen aan of juist niet?

  • Chris RiezebosEmail author
Biomechanica en Bewegingsanalyse
  • 2 Downloads

Samenvatting

De laatste acht jaar is er in de wetenschap en daarbuiten een interessante (en soms heftige) discussie ontstaan over de vraag wat beter is: geschoeid hardlopen of blootsvoets (barefoot running). Uit de literatuur blijkt dat het geen verschil maakt voor het aantal blessures, maar dat juist het type voetlanding (op de hiel of op de voorvoet) veel meer effect heeft op de krachten tijdens het neerkomen dan het al dan niet dragen van schoenen. Ook blijkt dat bij het overgaan van geschoeid naar blootsvoets hardlopen, of naar hardlopen op minimalistisch schoeisel, meer dan de helft van de renners een hiellanding blijft gebruiken.

Trefwoorden

hardlopen geschoeid blootsvoets minimalistisch schoeisel voetlanding impact transient loading rate 

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Lieberman D, Venkadesan M, Werbel W, Daoud A, D’Andrea S, Davis I, Mang’Eni R, Pitsiladis Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010;463:531–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altman A, Davis I. Barefoot running: biomechanics and implications for running injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11(5):244–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gent R van, Siem D, Middelkoop M van, Os A van, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Koes B. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:469–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Middelkoop M van, Kolkman J, Ochten J van, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Koes B. Prevalence and incidence of lower extremity injuries in male marathon runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18:140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nigg B, Baltich J, Hoerzer S, Enders H. Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: ‘preferred movement path’ and ‘comfort filter’. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1290–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poppel D van, Scholten-Peeters G, Middelkoop M van, Verhagen A. Prevalence, incidence and course of lower extremity injuries in runners during a 12-month follow-up period. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:943–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NOC*NCF. 2016. Beschikbaar via https://www.nocnsf.nl/in-2016-recordaantal-sporters-in-nederland. Geraadpleegd op: 5 november 2018.
  8. 8.
    Altman A, Davis I. A Kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lieberman D. What we can learn about running from barefoot running: an evolutionary medical perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012;40(2):63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mei Q, Fernandez J, Fu W, Feng N, Yaodong Gu Y. A comparative biomechanical analysis of habitually unshod and shod runners based on a foot morphological difference. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;42:38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasegawa H, Yamauchi T, Kraemer W. Foot strike patterns of runners at 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(3):888–93.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kasmer M, Liu X, Roberts K, Valadao J. Foot-strike pattern and performance in a marathon. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(3):286–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasmer M, Wren J, Hoffman M. Foot strike pattern and gait changes during a 161-km ultramarathon. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(5):1343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larson P, Higgins E, Kaminski J, Decker T, Preble J, Lyons D, et al. Foot strike patterns of recreational and sub-elite runners in a long-distance road race. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(15):1665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larson P. Comparison of foot strike patterns of barefoot and minimally shod runners in a recreational road race. J Sport Health Sci. 2014;3:137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Southern Methodist University. Hiellanding geschoeid [videofilm]. Beschikbaar via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zavoQM3727s. Geraadpleegd op: 5 november 2018.
  17. 17.
    Southern Methodist University. Voorvoetlanding geschoeid [videofilm]. Beschikbaar via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO4MruQov4Q. Geraadpleegd op: 5 november 2018.
  18. 18.
    Southern Methodist University. Hiellanding blootsvoets [videofilm]. Beschikbaar via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPP7jFiTocQ. Geraadpleegd op: 5 november 2018.
  19. 19.
    Southern Methodist University. Voorvoetlanding blootsvoets [videofilm]. Beschikbaar via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjrEyfQC5NQ. Geraadpleegd op: 5 november 2018.
  20. 20.
    Ervilha U, Mochizuki L, Figueira A Jr, Hamill J. Are muscle activation patterns altered during shod and barefoot running with a forefoot footfall pattern? J Sports Sci. 2017;35(17):1697–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shih Y, Lin K, Shiang T. Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running? Gait Posture. 2013;38:490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clark K, Ryan L, Weyand P. Foot speed, foot-strike and footwear: linking gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:2037–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daoud A, Geissler G, Wang F, Saretsky J, Daoud Y, Lieberman D. Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(7):1325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gruber A, Edwards W, Hamill J, Derrick T, Boyer K. A comparison of the ground reaction force frequency content during rearfoot and non-rearfoot running patterns. Gait Posture. 2017;56:54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kluitenberg B, Bredeweg S, Zijlstra S, Zijlstra W, Buist-Kluitenberg I. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study. Bmc Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tam N, Prins D, Divekar N, Lamberts R. Biomechanical analysis of gait waveform data: exploring differences between shod and barefoot running in habitually shod runners. Gait Posture. 2017;58:274–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clark K, Ryan L, Weyand P. A general relationship links gait mechanics and running ground reaction forces. J Exp Biol. 2017;220:247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Clercq D, Aerts P, Kunnen M. The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study. J Biomech. 1994;27(10):1213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fontanella C, Matteoli S, Carniel E, Wilhjelm J, Virga A, Corvi A, Natali A. Investigation on the load-displacement curves of a human healthy heel pad: In vivo compression data compared to numerical results. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:1253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grigoriadis G, Newell N, Carpanen D, Christou A, Bull A, Spyros D, Masouros S. Material properties of the heel fat pad across strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;65:398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greene P, Coleman J. Elastic spring constants for running shoes: a mathematical model. J Comput Sci Syst Biol. 2015;8(4):215–8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Divert C, Mornieux G, Baur H, Mayer F, Belli A. Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26:593–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tam N, Darragh I, Divekar N, Lamberts R. Habitual minimalist shod running biomechanics and the acute response to running barefoot. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38:770–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Au I, Lau F, An W, Zhang J, Tony L, Chen T, Cheung R. Immediate and short-term biomechanical adaptation of habitual barefoot runners who start shod running. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(4):451–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RijswijkNederland

Personalised recommendations