Advertisement

Netherlands Heart Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 199–204 | Cite as

Rate control in atrial fibrillation, insight into the RACE II study

  • H. F. Groenveld
  • H. J. G. M. Crijns
  • J. G. P. Tijssen
  • M. Alings
  • H. L. Hillege
  • Y. S. Tuininga
  • M. P. Van den Berg
  • D. J. Van Veldhuisen
  • I. C. Van GelderEmail author
ICIN

Introduction

Currently, in Europe, more than 6 million patients have atrial fibrillation (AF) [1]. It is expected that this number will double in the next 30–50 years [1, 2, 3]. With AF, the risk of death, stroke and heart failure is increased [4, 5, 6], and exercise capacity and quality of life are reduced [7, 8]. Thus, AF is not a benign disease. Despite efforts to maintain sinus rhythm, AF is a progressive arrhythmia [9, 10, 11] and many patients eventually develop permanent AF. Until recently, the treatment of this specific patient group was not evidence based. An evidence-based treatment strategy is indispensable considering the large patient population.

It was not until the beginning of this decade that it became apparent that it was not the rhythm that determined the prognosis, i.e. there was no difference in outcome between rate (treatment aimed at heart rate reduction) and rhythm control (treatment aimed at restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm) [ 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18...

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by a major grant obtained from the Netherlands Heart Foundation and unrestricted educational grants from AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Roche and Sanofi Aventis France paid to the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute Netherlands.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Van Gelder reports receiving consulting fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Cardiome, grant support from Medtronic, Biotronik and St. Jude Medical, lecture fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Medtronic. Dr. Crijns reports receiving consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis and AstraZeneca, grant support from St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, Medapharma and Merck, and honoraria from Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis, Medapharma, Merck, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Biosense Webster, Dr. Alings reports receiving consulting fees from Bayer-AG, BMS-Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, Dr. Van Veldhuisen reports having received Board memberships from Amgen, BG Medicine, Johnson & Johnson, Sorbent, Novartis, and Vifor.

References

  1. 1.
    Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2010;12:1360–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:949–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98:946–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, et al. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1765–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorian P, Jung W, Newman D, et al. The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hagens VE, Ranchor AV, Van Sonderen E, et al. Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lown B, Amarasingham R, Neuman J. New method for terminating cardiac arrhythmias. Use of synchronized capacitor discharge. JAMA. 1962;182:548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown KW, Whitehead EH, Morrow JD. Treatment of cardiac arrhythmias with synchronized electrical countershock. Can Med Assoc J. 1964;90:103–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McDonald L, Resnekov L, O’Brien K. Direct-current shock in treatment of drug-resistant cardiac arrhythmias. Br Med J. 1964;1:1468–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1789–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, et al. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1690–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Opolski G, Torbicki A, Kosior DA, et al. Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) study. Chest. 2004;126:476–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogawa S, Yamashita T, Yamazaki T, et al. Optimal treatment strategy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: J-RHYTHM study. Circ J. 2009;73:242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2667–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114:e257–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cooper HA, Bloomfield DA, Bush DE, et al. Relation between achieved heart rate and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management [AFFIRM] study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Rienstra M, et al. Does intensity of rate control influence outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation? Data of the RACE study. Am Heart J. 2009;158:785–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yahalom J, Klein HO, Kaplinsky E. Beta-adrenergic blockade as adjunctive oral therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1977;71:592–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    David D, Segni ED, Klein HO, et al. Inefficacy of digitalis in the control of heart rate in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: beneficial effect of an added beta adrenergic blocking agent. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44:1378–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stern EH, Pitchon R, King BD, et al. Clinical use of oral verapamil in chronic and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1982;81:308–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lang R, Klein HO, Weiss E, et al. Superiority of oral verapamil therapy to digoxin in treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1983;83:491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Panidis IP, Morganroth J, Baessler C. Effectiveness and safety of oral verapamil to control exercise-induced tachycardia in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving digitalis. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:1197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DiBianco R, Morganroth J, Freitag JA, et al. Effects of nadolol on the spontaneous and exercise-provoked heart rate of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation receiving stable dosages of digoxin. Am Heart J. 1984;108:1121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Myers J, Atwood JE, Sullivan M, et al. Perceived exertion and gas exchange after calcium and beta-blockade in atrial fibrillation. J Appl Physiol. 1987;63:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Atwood JE, Myers JN, Sullivan MJ, et al. Diltiazem and exercise performance in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1988;93:20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koh KK, Song JH, Kwon KS, et al. Comparative study of efficacy and safety of low-dose diltiazem or betaxolol in combination with digoxin to control ventricular rate in chronic atrial fibrillation: randomized crossover study. Int J Cardiol. 1995;52:167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koh KK, Kwon KS, Park HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of digoxin alone and in combination with low-dose diltiazem or betaxolol to control ventricular rate in chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Atwood JE, Myers J, Quaglietti S, et al. Effect of betaxolol on the hemodynamic, gas exchange, and cardiac output response to exercise in chronic atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1999;115:1175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Farshi R, Kistner D, Sarma JS, et al. Ventricular rate control in chronic atrial fibrillation during daily activity and programmed exercise: a crossover open-label study of five drug regimens. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:304–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Olshansky B, Rosenfeld LE, Warner AL, et al. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study: approaches to control rate in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Gelder IC, Wyse DG, Chandler ML, et al. Does intensity of rate-control influence outcome in atrial fibrillation? An analysis of pooled data from the RACE and AFFIRM studies. Europace. 2006;8:935–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Gelder IC, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Crijns HJ, et al. RAte Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between lenient versus strict rate control in patients with and without heart failure. Background, aims, and design of RACE II. Am Heart J. 2006;152:420–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Groenveld HF, Tijssen JG, Crijns HJ, et al. Rate Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: successful and failed strict rate control against a background of lenient rate control. Data from the RACE II study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:741–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Friberg L, Rosenqvist M. Cardiovascular hospitalization as a surrogate endpoint for mortality in studies of atrial fibrillation: report from the Stockholm Cohort Study of Atrial Fibrillation. Europace. 2011;13:626–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nieuwlaat R. The value of cardiovascular hospitalization as an endpoint for clinical atrial fibrillation research. Europace. 2011;13:601–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lechat P, Hulot JS, Escolano S, et al. Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II Trial. Circulation. 2001;103:1428–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van Veldhuisen DJ, Aass H, El Allaf D, et al. Presence and development of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure. Experiences from the MERIT-HF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:539–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Connolly SJ, Camm AJ, Halperin JL, et al. Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2268–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Van den Berg MP, et al. The effect of rate control on quality of life in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: data from the RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation II) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Groenveld
    • 1
  • H. J. G. M. Crijns
    • 2
  • J. G. P. Tijssen
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. Alings
    • 5
  • H. L. Hillege
    • 6
  • Y. S. Tuininga
    • 7
  • M. P. Van den Berg
    • 1
  • D. J. Van Veldhuisen
    • 1
  • I. C. Van Gelder
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, ThoraxcenterUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Maastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtthe Netherlands
  3. 3.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
  4. 4.Interuniversity Cardiology Institute NetherlandsUtrechtthe Netherlands
  5. 5.Amphia HospitalBredathe Netherlands
  6. 6.Trial Coordination Center, Department of EpidemiologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
  7. 7.Deventer HospitalDeventerthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations