Public Transport

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 443–456 | Cite as

Demonstration and evaluation of an intermittent bus lane strategy

  • Nicolas ChiabautEmail author
  • Anais Barcet
Case Study and Application


The innovative concept of intermittent bus lanes may lead to an important increase of bus system performance while limiting the reduction of the capacity devoted to general traffic. The main idea is that a general traffic lane can be intermittently converted to an exclusive bus lane. Frequently studied by analytical papers, practical demonstrations of the intermittent bus lane strategy are not numerous. Especially, the results of the two previous field tests are very specific to the test sites and are hardly transposable. This paper tries to fill this gap by proposing the results and the lessons learned of a new real-field demonstration in Lyon, France. After a detailed presentation of the 350-m case study, effects of an intermittent bus lane strategy on traffic conditions are evaluated. Then, analyses of the impacts on the bus systems performance are carefully performed and also compared to more classical bus operations: a transit signal priority strategy. The results show that an intermittent bus lane can be a promising strategy especially when it is combined with transit signal priority. The median travel time of the buses is significantly reduced whereas the regularity of the line increases.


Intermittent bus lane Traffic management Transit signal priority Experimentation 



The authors are grateful to the Metropole de Lyon (Mr. Pierre Soulard and his team) for their energy to experiment such an innovative solution. We also thank them for all the support in the data collection. This project is partly supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 646592 – MAGnUM project). An earlier version of this paper was presented at TRB:


  1. Bagherian M, Mesbah M, Ferreira L (2015) Using delay functions to evaluate transit priority at signals. Public Transp 7(1):61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrebi SJ, Hans E, Chiabaut N, Laval JA, Leclercq L, Watkins KE (2018) Comparing bus holding methods with and without real-time prediction. Transp Res Part C 87:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiabaut N (2015) Investigating impacts of pickup-delivery maneuvers on traffic flow dynamics. Transp Res Proced 6:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiabaut N, Xie X, Leclercq L (2012) Road capacity and travel times with bus lanes and intermittent priority activation: analytical investigations. Transp Res Rec 2315:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiabaut N, Xie X, Leclercq L (2014) Performance analysis for different designs of a multimodal urban arterial. Transp B Transp Dyn 2(3):229–245Google Scholar
  6. Currie G, Lai H (2008) Intermittent and dynamic transit lanes: Melbourne, Australia, experience. Transp Res Rec 2072:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eichler M (2006) Bus lanes with intermittent priority: assessment and design. Master’s thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Eichler M, Daganzo CF (2006) Bus lanes with intermittent priority: strategy formulae and an evaluation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 40(9):731–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guler S, Cassidy M (2012) Strategies for sharing bottleneck capacity among buses and cars. Transp Res Part B Methodol 46(10):1334–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guler I, Menendez M (2015) Pre-signals for bus priority: basic guidelines for implementation. Public Transp 7(3):339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2013) Transit capacity and quality of service manual, 3rd edn. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Thamizh Arasan V, Vedagiri P (2010) Study of the impact of exclusive bus lane under highly heterogeneous traffic condition. Public Transp 2:135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Todd M, Barth M, Eichler M, Daganzo C, Shaheen S (2006) Enhanced transit strategies: bus lanes with intermittent priority and ITS technology architectures for TOD enhancement. In: California PATH Research Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-2006-2Google Scholar
  14. Viegas J, Lu B (1997) Turn of the century, survival of the compact city, revival of public transport. In: Meersman H, Van de Voorde E (eds) Transforming the port and transportation business. Studiecentrum voor Economisch en Sociaal Onderzoek, Antwerp, Belgium, pp 55–63Google Scholar
  15. Viegas J, Lu B (2004) The intermittent bus lane signals setting within an area. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 12(6):453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Viegas J, Roque R, Lu B, Vieira J (2007) The intermittent bus lane system: demonstration in Lisbon. In: Proceedings of the 86th transportation research board annual meeting (TRB)Google Scholar
  17. Wu J, Hounsell N (1998) Bus priority using pre-signals. Transp Res Part A 32(8):563–583Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Lyon, ENTPE, IFSTTAR, LICITLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations