Public Transport

, Volume 6, Issue 1–2, pp 21–34 | Cite as

Variability of commuters’ bus line choice: an analysis of oyster card data

  • Fumitaka Kurauchi
  • Jan-Dirk Schmöcker
  • Hiroshi Shimamoto
  • Seham M. Hassan
Original Paper

Abstract

A hyperpath can be defined as a set of attractive lines identified by the passenger, each of which might be the optimal one from the current stop, depending on lines’ arrival time, frequency, cost etc. This concept can lead to complex route choice and has been a fundamental assumption in most transit assignment models, despite few evidence whether passengers’ indeed select such complex strategies. This research uses time series smart card data from London to investigate flexibility in buses chosen by morning commuters. The analysis is based on n-step Markov models and proposes that the variations in bus lines taken by passengers who supposedly travel between the same OD pair every morning over several days should reflect the set of paths included in an (optimal) hyperpath. Our hypothesis is that a large variation in bus lines over days indicates a complex hyperpath whereas a passenger who takes the same line every morning does not consider many alternatives. Our results suggest that there is indeed significant variation in bus lines chosen, possibly in accordance with the theory of hyperpaths in networks with uncertainty.

Keywords

Bus line choice variation Oyster card data Travel behaviour Markov model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research, No. 2365312, (2011–2012) from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. This research has been carried out in collaboration with the DynCapCon project headed by Prof. Michael G.H. Bell during his time at Imperial College London and Dr. Achille Fonzone (Edinburgh Napier University). We would like to thank Transport for London who kindly provided us with the Oyster card data.

References

  1. Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2006) Mining public transport user behaviour from smart card data. In: 12th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing—INCOM 2006, Saint-Etienne, France, May 1410919 Google Scholar
  2. Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2008) Mining smart card data from an urban transit network. In: Wang J (ed) Encyclopedia of data warehouse and mining Google Scholar
  3. Andreasson I (1976) A method for the analysis of transit networks. In: Roubens M (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd European congress on operations research. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–8 Google Scholar
  4. Chapleau R, Trépanier M, Chu KK (2008) The ultimate survey for transit planning: complete information with smart card data and GIS. Paper presented at 8th international conference on survey in transport, Lacd’Annecy, France Google Scholar
  5. De Cea J, Fernández E (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport system: an equilibrium model. Transp Sci 27(2):133–147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fearnside K, Draper DP (1971) Public transport assignment—a new approach. Traffic Eng Control 13(7):298–299 Google Scholar
  7. Florian M (1977) Traffic equilibrium model of traffic by car and public transit modes. Transp Res 10:166–179 Google Scholar
  8. Florian M, Spiess H (1983) On two mode choice/assignment models. Transp Sci 17:32–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kato H, Kaneko Y, Inoue M (2010) Comparative analysis of transit assignment: evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Transp J 37(5):775–799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim JY, Kurauchi F, Uno N, Hagihara T, Daito T (2013) Using electronic toll collection data to understand traffic demand. J Intell Transp Syst. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2013.806858 published online, 29 May 2013 Google Scholar
  11. Kurauchi F, Bewll MGH, Schmöcker J-D (2003) Capacity constraint transit assignment with common lines. J Math Model Algorithms 2(4):309–327 Google Scholar
  12. Kurauchi F, Schmöcker J-D, Fonzone A, Hassan MS, Shimamoto H, Bell MGH (2012) Estimation of weights of times and transfers for hyperpath travellers. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, 2284, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC 89–99. doi: 10.3141/2284-11, 2012.10
  13. Kusakabe T, Iryo T, Asakura Y (2010) Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behaviour with smart card transaction data. Transp J 37(5):731–740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li D, Lin Y, Zhao X, Song H, Zou N (2011) Estimating a transit passenger trip origin-destination matrix using automatic fare collection system. In: Xu J, Yu G, Zhou S, Unland R (eds) Database systems for advanced applications. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6637. Springer, Berlin, pp 502–513 Google Scholar
  15. Mandl CE (1979) Evaluation and optimization of urban public transportation networks. Presented at the 3rd European congress on operations research, Amsterdam, Netherlands Google Scholar
  16. Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2006) Analyzing the variability of transit users behaviour with smart card data. In: The 9th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems—ITSC, Toronto, Canada, 17–20 September 2006, pp 8–13 Google Scholar
  17. Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2007) Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transp Policy 14(3):193–203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nguyen S, Pallottino S (1988) Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. Eur J Oper Res 37(2):176–186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nguyen S, Pallottino S, Gendreau M (1998) Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks. Transp Sci 32(1):54–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nishiuchi H, Kuwahara M, Miska M, Warita H (2010) OD volume variation and its prediction based on urban expressway ETC-OD data. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on transport research, p 2095, 2010.7 Google Scholar
  21. Nökel K, Wekeck S (2009) Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Paper presented at 88th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC Google Scholar
  22. Park JY, Kim DJ, Lim YT (2008) Use of smart card data to define public transit use in Seoul, South Korea. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 3–9. doi: 10.3141/2063-01
  23. Pelletier M, Trepanier M, Morency C (2011) Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 19:557–568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmöcker JD, Shimamto H, Kurauchi F (2013) Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths. Proc Soc Behav Sci 80(7):211–230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res 23B(2):83–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trépanier M, Tranchant N, Chapleau R (2007) Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. J Intell Transp Syst 11(1):1–14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Hurk E, Kroon LG, Maróti G, Vervest P (2012) Dynamic forecast model of time dependent passenger flows for disruption management. Paper presented at 12th conference on advanced systems for public transport in Santiago, Santiago, Chile, 23–27 July 2012 Google Scholar
  28. Wardman M (2004) Public transport values of time. Transp Policy 11:363–377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamazaki H, Uno N, Kurauchi F (2012) The effect of a new intercity expressway based on travel time reliability using electronic toll collection data. IET Intell Transp Syst 6(3):306–317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang F, Liu H (2007) A new modeling framework for traveller’s day-to-day route adjustment processes. In: Allsop RE, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG (eds) Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 813–837 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fumitaka Kurauchi
    • 1
  • Jan-Dirk Schmöcker
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Shimamoto
    • 3
  • Seham M. Hassan
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept of Civil Eng.Gifu UniversityGifu CityJapan
  2. 2.Dept of Urban ManagementKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan
  4. 4.Dept of Civil EngineeringAswan UniversityAswanEgypt

Personalised recommendations