Public Transport

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 165–186 | Cite as

Implementation of an iterative headway-based bus holding strategy with real-time information

Original Paper

Abstract

In high frequency bus service lines buses often come irregularly at the stops, often in bunches, due to the uncertainty of the passenger demand and behavior and unexpected conditions on the roads. Vehicle holding is a commonly used strategy among a variety of control strategies in transit operation in order to reduce bus bunching and regulate bus headways. This paper investigates a control strategy of holding a group of buses at a single or multiple control point(s). By incorporating any passenger boarding activities during holding, a single control point problem is developed and extended to multiple control points to reduce the variance of headways for the downstream stops. The problem is a non-convex optimization problem with linear constraints that minimizes the total passenger waiting time both on-board and at stops. A heuristic is then developed that is easy and fast to implement, which makes it suitable for real-time implementation. The model is evaluated with a simulation case study by using the real-time bus operation data (i.e., Automatic Vehicle Location and Automatic Passenger Count Data) from the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). The simulation results show that considering the boarding activities in the total waiting time, our model mitigates the error propagation and maintains steady performance, compared to the common models in the literature, which do not consider boarding while holding.

Keywords

Transit operations Headway regularity Bus holding Control strategy 

References

  1. Abkowitz M, Engelstein I (1984) Methods for maintaining transit service regularity. Transp Res Rec 961:1–8 Google Scholar
  2. Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M (1990) Implementing headway-based reliability control on transit routes. J Transp Eng 1(7):49–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abkowitz M, Tozzi T (1986) Transit route characteristics and headway-based reliability control. Transp Res Rec 1078:11–16 Google Scholar
  4. Barnett A (1974) On controlling randomness in transit operations. Transp Sci 8(2):102–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellei G, Gkoumas K (2009) Threshold- and information-based holding at multiple stops. Intell Transp Syst J 3(3):304–313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellei G, Gkoumas K (2010) Transit vehicles’ headway distribution and service irregularity. Public Transp 2(4):269–289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cortes CE, Saez D, Milla F, Munez A, Riquelme M (2010) Hybrid predictive control for real-time optimization of public transport system’s operations based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 18(5):757–769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CTAPerformance Metrics (2011) Available at http://www.transitchicago.com/assets/1/performance_metrics/CTA_Company_Wide_KPI_Dec_11.pdf. Last accessed on Jan 5, 2012
  9. Daganzo CF (2009) A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: systematic analysis and comparisons. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 43:913–921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R, Cipriano A (2009) Real-time control of buses in a transit corridor based on vehicle holding and boarding limits. Transp Res Rec 2090:59–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R (2012) How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance? Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 46:1202–1217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding Y, Chien S (2001) Improving transit service quality and headway regularity with real time control. Transp Res Rec 1760:160–171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eberlein XJ, Wilson NHM, Bernstein D (2001) The holding problem with real-time information available. Transp Sci 35(1):1–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu L, Yang X (2002) Design and implementation of bus-holding control strategies with real-time information. Transp Res Rec 1791:6–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu L, Liu Q, Kalamai P (2003) Real-time optimization model for dynamic scheduling of transit operations. Transp Res Rec 1857:48–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herman R, Lam T (1974) Trip characteristics of journeys to and from work. In: Transportation and traffic theory, proceedings of the sixth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, New York Google Scholar
  17. Hickman M (2001) An analytical stochastic model for the transit vehicle holding problem. Transp Sci 35(3):215–237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin J, Ruan M (2009) Probability-based bus headway regularity measure. Intell Transp Syst 3(4):400–408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Dell S, Wilson NHM (1999) Optimal real-time control strategies for rail transit operations during disruption. In: Computer aided systems in public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 471, pp 299–323 Google Scholar
  20. Oort NV, Wilson NHM, Nes RV (2010) Reliability improvement in short headway transit services. Transp Res Rec 2143:67–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oort NV, Boterman JW, Nes RV (2012) The impact of scheduling on service reliability: trip-time determination and holding points in long-headway services. Public Transp 4:39–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Puong A, Wilson NHM (2008) A train holding model for urban rail transit systems. In: Computer aided systems in public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 600, pp 319–337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen S, Wilson NHM (2001) An optimal integrated real-time disruption control model for rail transit systems. In: Computer-aided scheduling of public transport. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 505, pp 335–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun A, Hickman M (2008) The holding problem at multiple holding stations. In: Computer-aided systems in public transport, vol 600, pp 339–359. Part III CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toledo T, Cats O, Burghout W, Koutsopoulos HN (2010) Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 18(6):896–908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Turner JK, Wardrop JG (1951) The variation of journey time in central London. Road Research Laboratory Note No. RN/1511/JKT.JGW Google Scholar
  27. Turnquist MA (1981) Strategies for improving reliability of bus transit service. Transp Res Rec 818:7–13 Google Scholar
  28. Welding PI (1957) The instability of a close-interval service. Oper Res Q 8(3):133–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xuan Y, Argote J, Daganzo CF (2011) Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: optimal linear control and performance analysis. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 45:1831–1845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Anderson Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of California at RiversideRiversideUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, and Institute for Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations