Huisarts en wetenschap

, Volume 59, Issue 10, pp 447–450 | Cite as

Het roer is om, maar waar gaan we naartoe?

Commentaar
First Online:

Samenvatting

Het Roer Moet Om (HRMO) is er op een unieke manier in geslaagd om onvrede bij huisartsen te kanaliseren en om te zetten in een vervolg, Het Roer Gaat Om (HRGO).1,2 In dit commentaar kijken wij naar de ontwikkelingen tot nu toe en naar mogelijkheden en problemen voor de toekomst.

Commentaar 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Campmans-Kuijpers MJ, Baan CA, Lemmens LC, Klomp ML, Romeijnders AC, Rutten GE. Association between quality management and performance indicators in Dutch diabetes care groups: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oude Wesselink SF, Lingsma HF, Ketelaars CAJ, Mackenbach JP, Robben PBM. Effect of government supervision on quality of integrated diabetes care: a cluster randomized trial. Medical Care 2015;53:784–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metzelthin S, Van Rossum E, De Witte L, Ambergen AW, Hobma SO, Sipers W, et al. Effectiveness of an interdisciplinary primary care approach to reduce disability in community dwelling frail older people: cluster randomized clinical trial. BMJ 2013;347:5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoogendijk EO, Van der Horst HE, Van de Ven PM, Twisk JW, Deeg DJ, Frijters DH, et al. Effectiveness of a geriatric care model for frail older adults in primary care: results from a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Eur J Int Med 2016;28:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruikes FG, Zuidema SU, Akkermans RP, Assendelft WJ, Schers HJ, Koopmans RT. Multicomponent program to reduce functional decline in frail elderly people: a cluster controlled trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29: 209–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Polyfarmacie bij ouderen. Utrecht: Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patterson SM, Hughes C, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:CD008165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hobma S. Polyfarmacie bij ouderen. Huisarts Wet 2013;56: 388–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reactie N.D. Scherpbier-de Haan website H&WGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Engels Y. Assessing and improving management in primary care practices in the Netherland and in Europe. Dissertation. Nijmegen: UMC St Radboud, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nouwens E, Van Lieshout J, Wensing M. Determinants of impact of a practice accreditation program in primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nouwens E, van Lieshout J, Bouma M, Braspenning J, Wensing M. Effectiveness of improvement plans in primary care practice accreditation: a clustered randomized trial. PLOS One 2014; 9(12): e114045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaal S, Verstappen W, Wolters R, Lankveld H, van Weel C, Wensing M. Prevalence and consequences of patient safety incidents in general practice in the Netherlands; a retrospective medical record review study. Implement Sci 2011;6:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKay J, Bradley N, Murray L, Bowie P. A review of significant events analysed in general practice: implications for the quality and safety of patient care. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hobbs FD, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T, et al. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. Lancet 2016;387:2323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson M, Walter F. Increases in general practice workload in England. Lancet 2016;387:2270–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke M, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, et al. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy-makers and clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD 009401.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research 2014;14:2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berwick DM. Era 3 for medicine and health care. JAMA 2016;315:1329–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burgers J. Op koers naar een nieuw tijdperk. Huisarts Wet 2016;59:257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.UMCRadboudThe Netherlands
  3. 3.afdeling huisartsgeneeskunde en gezondheidszorgonderzoekUniversiteit HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations