Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 197–202 | Cite as

Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department: Current Status

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)


In the United States alone, nearly 7 million patients present annually to emergency departments (ED) with complaints of chest pain suspicious for acute coronary ischemia. Acute chest pain represents a clinical as well as economic challenge, resulting in elaborate, time-consuming, and expensive work-ups to avoid litigation related to missed diagnoses of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is an attractive noninvasive technique with promising data for use in the ED due to its high accuracy and negative predictive value. Recent studies have demonstrated that coronary CTA can aid in safe, rapid, and cost-efficient triage of patients with acute chest pain. Additional applications of plaque characterization, fractional flow analysis, and CT perfusion imaging hold promise in providing incremental data in patients with suspected ACS.


Coronary CT angiography Emergency department Chest pain Acute coronary syndrome 


Conflict of Interest

Abhay N. Bilolikar declares no conflict of interest. Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan declares no conflict of interest.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Medical Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2009 Emergency Department Summary. 2010. Accessed January 7, 2013.
  2. 2.
    •• Kohn MA, Kwan E, Gupta M, Tabas JA. Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain. J Emerg Med. 2005;29:383–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:219–24. These 3 recent randomized, controlled trials of use of coronary CTA in the emergency department compared with standard-of-care in acute chest pain patients have provided unequivocal evidence for this specific application. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1648–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meinertz T, Hamm CW. Rapid testing for cardiac troponins in patients with acute chest pain in the emergency room. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:973–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer AJ, Ardise J, Gulla J, Cangro J. Point-of-care testing reduces length of stay in emergency department chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:587–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Svensson L, Axelsson C, Nordlander R, Herlitz J. Prognostic value of biochemical markers, 12-lead ECG and patient characteristics amongst patients calling for an ambulance due to a suspected acute coronary syndrome. J Intern Med. 2004;255:469–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;29:116–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. ACCF/AHA Focused update of the guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 Guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123:2022–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1187–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1163–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood SS, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:364–76.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wackers FJ, Brown KA, Heller GV, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on radionuclide imaging in patients with suspected acute ischemic syndromes in the emergency department or chest pain center. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:246–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1414–22.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography vs standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:299–308.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1393–403.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cury RC, Feuchtner GM, Batlle JC, et al. Triage of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: implementation of coronary CT angiography in a large urban health care system. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:57–65.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(8):849–60.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, et al. The incremental prognostic value of cardiac CT in CAD using CONFIRM (COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation For clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(5):463–72Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G, et al. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:402–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haidary A, Bis K, Vrachliotis T, Kosuri R, Balasubramaniam M. Enhancement performance of a 64-slice triple rule-out protocol vs 16-slice and 10-slice multidetector CT-angiography protocols for evaluation of aortic and pulmonary vasculature. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:917–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halpern EJ, Levin DC, Zhang S, Takakuwa KM. Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol vs a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1039–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Haidary A, et al. Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;243:368–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gallagher MJ, Raff GL. Use of multislice CT for the evaluation of emergency room patients with chest pain: the so-called "triple rule-out". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71:92–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madder RD, Raff GL, Hickman L, et al. Comparative diagnostic yield and 3-month outcomes of "triple rule-out" and standard protocol coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5(3):165–71.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rogers IS, Banerji D, Siegel EL, et al. Usefulness of comprehensive cardiothoracic computed tomography in the evaluation of acute undifferentiated chest discomfort in the emergency department (CAPTURE). Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(5):643–50.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:407. e1–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve vs angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldstein J. CT Angiography to deduce coronary physiology. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:503–505.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feuchtner GM, Plank F, Pena C, et al. Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart. 2012;98(20):1510–7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1989–97.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 1988;78:1157–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte Jr M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2020–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Broadley AJ, et al. 16-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:749–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chinnaiyan KM, McCullough PA, Flohr TG, Wegner JH, Raff GL. Improved noninvasive coronary angiography in morbidly obese patients with dual-source computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(1):35–42.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raff GL. Radiation dose from coronary CT angiography: five years of progress. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:365–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologyWilliam Beaumont HospitalRoyal OakUSA

Personalised recommendations