Hazard identification for equipment-related fatal incidents in the U.S. underground coal mining

  • Vladislav Kecojevic
  • Zainalabidin Md Nor


Based on the number of fatalities per year, a persistent area of concern in mine safety continues to be equipment related. Data from the period 1995 through 2007 were studied in order to identify major hazards for underground mining equipment-related fatal incidents and to perform an analysis of those that occurred over the last 13 years. Reports on equipment-related fatal incidents were obtained from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). The results show that underground mining equipment including continuous miner, shuttle car, roof bolter, load-haul-dump (LHD), longwall and hoisting contributed to a total of 69 mining-related fatalities. The study reveals that the major hazard for continuous mining equipment-related fatal incidents is “Failure of victim to respect equipment working area”, while the highest number of fatalities for shuttle car is attributed to the hazard “Failure of mechanical components.” The study further reveals that the highest number of fatalities for roof bolter, LHD, and longwall are attributed to the hazards “Working under unsupported roof”, “Failure of management to provide safe working conditions”, and “Failure of mechanical components”, respectively. It is determined that one fatality for the hoisting system is attributed to the hazard “Failure of mechanical components” and one to the hazard “Failure to follow safe maintenance procedure”. Finally, approaches to prevention were also discussed in this paper.


coal mining safety equipment fatal incidents hazard 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anon, 1982. Toward Safer Underground Coal Mines, National Research Council, Committee on Underground Coal Mine Safety, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess-Limerick R, 2006. Identifying injury risks associated with underground coal mining equipment. In: Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association Congress (Pikaar R N, Koningsveld E A P, Settels P J M, eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Burgess-Limerick R, Steiner L, 2007. Preventing equipment related injuries in underground U.S. coal mines. Mining Engineering, 59(9): 20–32.Google Scholar
  4. Butani S J, 1986. Hazard analysis of mining equipment by mine type and geographical region. In: Engineering health and safety in coal mining (Khair W, ed.). Littleton: Colorado.Google Scholar
  5. CAN/CSA Q850-97, 2002. Risk management: guideline for decision makers. Canadian Standard Association.Google Scholar
  6. Groves W, Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D, 2007. Analysis of fatalities and injuries involving mining equipment. Journal of Safety Research, 38(4): 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinrich H W, 1959. Industrial incident prevention: a scientific approach (4th Edition). McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  8. Helander M G, Krohn G S, Curtin R, 1983. Safety of roof-bolting operations in underground coal mines. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 5: 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D, Groves W, 2006. Risk analysis of equipment-related fatalities in U.S. mining operations. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection. Torino: 119–125.Google Scholar
  10. Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D, Groves W, Radomsky M, 2007. An analysis of equipment-related fatal accidents in U.S. mining operations: 1995–2005. Safety Science, 45(8): 864–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kecojevic V, Md-Nor Z A, Komljenovic D, Groves W, 2008. Risk assessment for belt conveyor-related fatal incidents in the U.S. Mining. Bulk Solids & Powder Science & Technology, 39(2): 3–15.Google Scholar
  12. Kecojevic V, Radomsky M, 2004. The causes and control of loader- and truck-related fatalities in surface mining operations. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 11(4): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Komljenovic D, Groves W, Kecojevic V, 2008. Injuries in U.S. mining operations—a preliminary risk analysis. Safety Science, 46(5): 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levens R, 1998. A general framework for prioritizing research to reduce injuries and diseases in mining. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 4(6): 1 285–1 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. May J P, 1990. Analysis of dump-point accidents involving mobile mining equipment. Information Circular 9250, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh Research Centre: 19.Google Scholar
  16. Md-Nor Z A, Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D, Groves W, 2008a. Risk assessment for loader and dozer-related fatal incidents in the U.S. mining. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 15(2): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Md-Nor Z A, Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D, Groves, W, 2008b. Risk assessment for haul truck-related fatalities in mining. Mining Engineering, 60(3): 43–49.Google Scholar
  18. Mine Safety and Health Administration, 2007. Equipment safety and health information.
  19. Phiri J, 1989. The development of statistical indices for the evaluation of hazards in longwall face operations. Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  20. Ramani R V, 1992. Personnel Health and Safety. Mining Engineering Handbook (Hartman H, ed.), 2: 995.Google Scholar
  21. Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand (AS/NZS 4360; 2004). Risk Management, Homebush, Wellington, Standard.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editorial Office of Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China) and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations