Psychometric properties of a sluggish cognitive tempo scale in Japanese adults with and without ADHD
This study examined the psychometric properties, convergent validity, and divergent validity of a Japanese translation of Barkley (The Barkley adult ADHD rating scale–IV, Guilford Press, New York, 2011) rating scale for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) in adults. In total, 429 Japanese adults participated across three samples: 26 diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; ages 19–50), 81 adults without ADHD (ages 22–65), and 322 university students (ages 18–27). All participants completed rating scales of SCT, ADHD, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. A subset of participants completed the SCT measure at two time points two weeks apart. The SCT measure (5 items) showed acceptable levels of internal consistency and test–retest reliability. This scale also demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity, as evidenced by factor analyses between SCT and ADHD inattention (ADHD-IN) symptoms as well as adequate fit of a four-factor model involving SCT, ADHD-IN, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (ADHD-HI), and internalizing symptoms. Additionally, SCT and ADHD-IN dimensions were differentially associated with ADHD-HI and internalizing factors. The ADHD group scored higher on SCT ratings compared to the student and adult non-ADHD groups even after controlling for the severity of ADHD and internalizing symptoms. The 5-item SCT measure appears reliable and demonstrates preliminary evidence of validity in Japanese adults, providing initial support for the transcultural validity of the SCT construct. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the SCT items that did not meet criteria for convergent and discriminant validity in the current study, and to examine functional outcomes of individuals recruited based on clinically elevated SCT symptoms.
KeywordsAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Adult ADHD Japan Sluggish cognitive tempo Rating scale
The authors received no specific funding for this work. Stephen Becker is currently supported by award number K23MH108603 from the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Becker has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). Dr. McBurnett has received research support from IES and Shire and has received presentation honoraria from Sunovion.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barkley RA (2011) The Barkley adult ADHD rating scale–IV. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Becker SP, Barkley RA (2018) Sluggish cognitive tempo. In: Banaschewski T, Coghill D, Zuddas A (eds) Oxford textbook of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–153Google Scholar
- Becker SP Sluggish cognitive tempo: the need for global inquiry. World Psychiatry (in press)Google Scholar
- Becker SP, Langberg JM, Luebbe AM, Dvorsky MR, Flannery AJ (2014a) Sluggish cognitive tempo is associated with academic functioning and internalizing symptoms in college students with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol 70:388–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker SP, Leopold DR, Burns GL, Jarrett MA, Langberg JM, Marshall SA, McBurnett K, Waschbusch DA, Willcutt EG (2016) The internal, external, and diagnostic validity of sluggish cognitive tempo: a meta-analysis and critical review. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55:163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker SP, Garner AA, Tamm L, Antonini TN, Epstein JN (2017) Honing in on the social difficulties associated with sluggish cognitive tempo in children: Withdrawal, peer ignoring, and low engagement. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1286595 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernad MM, Servera M, Grases G, Collado S, Burns GL (2014) A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of the external correlates of sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD-inattention symptoms dimensions. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9866-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burns GL, Becker SP, Servera M, Bernad MD, García-Banda G (2017) Sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) inattention in the home and school contexts: parent and teacher invariance and cross-setting validity. Psychol Assess 29:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Japanese WAIS-III Publication Committee (2006) Japanese Wechsler adult intelligence scale, 3rd edn. Nihon Bunka Kagakusya, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Jarrett MA, Rapport HF, Rondon AT, Becker SP (2017) ADHD dimensions and sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in relation to self-report and laboratory measures of neuropsychological functioning in college students. J Atten Disord 21:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714560821 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kessler RC, Adler LA, Gruber MJ, Sarawate CA, Spencer T, Van Brunt DL (2007) Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 16:52–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.208 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH, Janavs J, Dunbar GC (1997) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatr 12:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, Burns GL, Beauchaine TP, Becker SP (2016) Bifactor latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms. Psychol Assess 28:917–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leopold DR, Bryan AD, Pennington BF, Willcutt EG (2015) Evaluating the construct validity of adult ADHD and SCT among college students: a multitrait-multimethod analysis of convergent and discriminant validity. J Atten Disord 19:200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714553051 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leopold DR, Christopher ME, Burns GL, Becker SP, Olson RK, Willcutt EG (2016) ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo throughout childhood: temporal invariance and stability from preschool through ninth grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 12:1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/jccp.12505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Little TD (2013) Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McBurnett K, Villodas M, Burns GL, Hinshaw SP, Beaulieu A, Pfiffner LJ (2014) Structure and validity of sluggish cognitive tempo using an expanded item pool in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9801-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2014) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Nitobe I (1905) Bushido: the soul of Japan. G. P. Putnam’s and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Otsubo T, Tanaka K, Koda R, Shinoda J, Sano N, Tanaka S, Aoyama H, Mimura M, Kamijima K (2005) Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatr Clin Neurosci 59:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01408.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rescorla L, Achenbach TM, Ivanova MY, Dumenci L, Almqvist F, Bilenberg N, Dobrean A, Döpfner M, Verhulst F (2007) Epidemiological comparisons of problems and positive qualities reported by adolescents in 24 countries. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.351 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakano Y, Fukui T, Kumano H, Horie H, Kawahara K, Yamamoto H, Nomura S, Suematsu H (1994) Development and validation of a New Mood Inventory. Japn Soc Psychosom Med 34:629–636Google Scholar
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2006) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Takeda T, Tsuji Y, Kurita H (2017) Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) self-report scale (ASRS-J) and its short scale in accordance with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Res Dev Disabil 63:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.02.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tseng W, Chang SC, Nishizono M (2005) Asian culture and psychotherapy: an overview. In: Tseng W, Chang SC, Nishizono M (eds) Asian culture and psychotherapy: implications for east and west. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu, pp 265–279Google Scholar