Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 465–487 | Cite as

Hegemony Reloaded – Warum die globalisierungskritische Bewegung nicht von der neoliberalen Krise profitiert

  • Annette Freyberg-Inan
  • Christian Scholl
Studie

Zusammenfassung

Wie können wir erklären, dass die Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise nicht von einer gegenhegemonialen Formation begleitet wird, die die neoliberale Hegemonie ernsthaft herausfordert? Die drei Hauptelemente unserer Erklärung sind 1) die Isolation hegemonialer Kräfte, 2) ihre Vereinnahmung moderater Kritik und 3) die Versicherheitlichung radikaler Kritik. Als Resultat des Zusammenspiels dieser hegemonialen Verteidigungsstrategien hat der Dissens der globalisierungskritischen Bewegung nicht zu einer gegenhegemonialen Formation geführt.

Schlüsselwörter

Globalisierungskritik Protest Neoliberalismus Hegemonie Gegenhegemonie Finanzkrise 

Hegemony Reloaded: Why the Anti-Globalization Movement Does not Benefit From the Neoliberal Crisis

Abstract

Why has neoliberal crisis not enabled a strengthening of counter-hegemonic capacity? Our explanation focuses on 1) the ability of hegemonic powers to insulate themselves from critique; 2) the co-optation of moderate critical discourse for the legitimation of further neoliberal measures; 3) the marginalization of radical dissent via current security discourses. Together, these factors help explain how neoliberal forces successfully prevent globalization-critical movements from becoming effectively counter-hegemonic.

Keywords

Counter-globalization Protest Neoliberalism Hegemony Counter-hegemony Financial crisis 

Literatur

  1. Arrighi, G. (2005). Hegemony unravelling (I and II). New Left Review, 32, 23–80. (33, 83–116).Google Scholar
  2. Backmund, M., Donat, U., & Ullmann, K. (2008). Feindbild Demonstrant: Polizeiliche Desinformationspolitik in Heiligendamm. In Republikanischer Anwältinnen- und Anwälteverein, Legal Team (Hrsg.), Feindbild Demonstrant. Polizeigewalt, Militäreinsatz, Medienmanipulationen: Der G8-Gipfel aus Sicht des Anwältlichen Notdienstes (S. 111–130). Berlin: Assoziation A.Google Scholar
  3. Bagge Laustsen, C., & Weaver, O. (2000). In defence of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitisation. Millennium, 29(3), 705–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balzacq, T., & Carrera, S. (Hrsg.). (2006). Security vs freedom? A challenge for europe’s future. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. BAO Kavala – Besondere Aufbauorganisation Kavala. (2007a). Amtliche Bekanntmachung der Polizeidi­rektion Rostock. http://gipfelsoli.org/Repression/Allgemeinverfuegung. Zugegriffen: 6. Feb. 2014.
  6. BAO Kavala – Besondere Aufbauorganisation Kavala. (2007b). Kavala Report 2. Rostock: BAO Kavala.Google Scholar
  7. Beyeler, M., & Kriesi, H. (2005). Transnational protest and the public sphere. Mobilization, 10(1), 95–109.Google Scholar
  8. Biermann, K. (2007, 21. Mai). Ein scharfes Symbol. Zeit Online. http://www.zeit.de/online/2007/21/heiligendamm-zaun. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  9. Birchfield, V., & Freyberg-Inan, A. (2004). Constructing opposition in the age of globalization: The potential of ATTAC. Globalizations, 1(2), 278–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birchfield, V., & Freyberg-Inan, A. (2005). Organic intellectuals and counter-hegemonic politics in the age of globalisation: The case of ATTAC. In C. Eschle & B. Maiguashca (Hrsg.), Critical theories, world politics and the ‚anti-globalization movement‘ (S. 154–73). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Birchfield, V., & Freyberg-Inan, A. (2009). ATTAC (Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens). In I. Ness (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of revolution and protest: 1500 to the present (S. 297–301). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Buttigieg, J. A. (2005). The contemporary discourse on civil society: A Gramscian critique. Boundary 2, 32(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzan, B. (2006). Will the ‚Global War on Terrorism‘ be the new Cold War? International Affairs, 82(6), 1101–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, A. F. (2007). Celebrity diplomacy and the G8: Bono and Bob as legitimate international actors. Working Paper for the Centre for International Governance Innovation, No. 29. http://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/paper_29-web.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. Feb. 2014.
  16. Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories.Google Scholar
  17. Chopra, R. (2003). Neoliberalism as Doxa: Bourdieu’s theory of the state and the contemporary Indian discourse on globalization and liberalization. Cultural Studies, 17(3), 419–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conway, J. (2004). Citizenship in a time of empire: The World Social Forum as a new public space. Citizenship Studies, 8(4), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox, R. (1986). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. In R. O. Keohane (Hrsg.), Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cox, R. (1993). Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: An essay in method. In S. Gill (Hrsg.), Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (S. 49–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crehan, K. (2002). Gramsci, culture, and anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Day, R. J. F. (2005). Gramsci is dead: Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  24. Della Porta, D. (Hrsg.). (2009). Democracy in social movements. Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Moca, L., & Reiter, H. (Hrsg.). (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dowling, E. (2010). Determining the materiality of events: An investigation into the social and political transformations produced by counterglobalisation struggles. PhD dissertation. Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar
  27. Fernandez, L. (2008). Policing dissent: Social control and the anti-globalization movement. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher, W., & Ponniah, T. (2003). Another world is possible: Popular alternatives to globalization at the World Social Forum. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Focus Online. (2007, 1. Juni). G8-Gipfel: Journalisten erstreiten Akkreditierung. http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/g8-gipfel_aid_62238.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  30. Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006). And a world to win: Is there an alternative-globalization consensus? In S. F. Krishna-Hensel (Hrsg.), Global cooperation: Challenges and opportunities in the twenty-first century (S. 201–220). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Freyberg-Inan, A. (2009). Ethical challenges of the European Neighborhood Policy. International Studies Association Annual Conference, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Freyberg-Inan, A. (2011). Global governance through factual constraint: The ascension of the IMF in the financial and Euro-crisis. International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal.Google Scholar
  33. Gamson, W. A. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  34. Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114–125.Google Scholar
  35. Gibson, J. (2008). The myth of the multitude: The endogenous demise of alter-globalist politics. Global Society, 22(2), 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gill, S. (2000). The postmodern prince. Millenium, 29(1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Greenberg, J., & Knight, G. (2004). Framing sweatshops: Nike, global production and the American news media. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Habermas, J. (1983). Ziviler Ungehorsam – Testfall für den demokratischen Rechtsstaat. In P. Glotz (Hrsg.), Ziviler Ungehorsam im Rechtsstaat (S. 29–53). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  40. Hamburger Morgenpost. (2007, 2. Juni). Kritik an Verweigerung der G8-Akkreditierung von Journalisten. http://www.mopo.de/news/g8-kritik-an-verweigerung-der-g8-akkreditierung-von-journalisten,5066732,5546424.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  41. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Heller, R., Kahl, M., & Pisoiu, D. (2012). The ‚Dark‘ Side of normative argumentation: The case of counterterrorism policy. Global Constitutionalism, 1(2), 278–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  46. Hopkins, N., & Connolly, K. (2000, 24. Aug.). Riots threaten Prague Autumn. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2000/aug/24/imf.economics. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  47. Hudig, K., & Dowling, E. (2010). Whatever happened to the counter-globalization movement? Some reflections on antagonism, vanguardism, and professionalization. In A. Choudry & D. Kapoor (Hrsg.), Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (S. 69–84). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  48. Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Ignatieff, M. (2004). The lesser evil: Political ethics in an age of terror. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Juris, J. (2005). Violence performed and imagined: Militant action, the black bloc and the mass media in Genoa. Critique of Anthropology, 25(4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Juris, J. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kidd, D. (2003). Becoming the media: The global IMC Network. In A. Opel & D. Pompper (Hrsg.), Representing resistance: Media, civil disobedience, and the global justice movement (S. 224–240). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  53. Kingsnorth, P. (2003). One no, many yeses: A journey to the heart of the global resistance movement. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kirton, J. (2005). Gleneagles G8 boosts Blair at home, 2005 Gleneagles summit analytical and compliance studies, G8 Information Center. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/2005gleneagles/coverage.html. Zugegriffen: 3. März 2014.
  55. Klein, N. (2004). Reclaimig the commons. In T. Mertes (Hrsg.), A movement of movements: Is another world really possible? (S. 219–229). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  57. Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie. (2007). Gewaltbereite Politik und der G8-Gipfel: Demonstrationsbeobachtungen vom 2.–8. Juni 2007 rund um Heiligendamm. Köln: Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie.Google Scholar
  58. Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (1992). New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22(2), 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. Laclau, E., & C. Mouffe. (1984). Hegemony & socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic practice. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. Mac Sheoin, T. (2013). Framing the movement, framing the protests: Mass media coverage of the anti-globalization movement. Interface, 5(1), 272–365.Google Scholar
  63. Monroy, M. (2011). Using false documents against ‚Euro-anarchists‘: The exchange of Anglo-German undercover police highlights controversial policy operations. www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-146-undercover-exchange-protests.pdf. . Zugegriffen: 3. Sep. 2011.Google Scholar
  64. Overbeek, H., & van Apeldoorn, B. (Hrsg.). (2012). Neoliberalism in crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  65. Peters, M. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism and Neoliberalism: Between theory and politics. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  66. Ponniah, T. (2008). The meaning of the US Social Forum: A reply to Whitaker and Bello’s debate on the open space. Societies Without Borders, 3(1), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rajagopal, B. (2003). International Law from below: Development, social movements, and third World resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Rajagopal, B. (2006). Counter-hegemonic International Law: Rethinking human rights and development as a third World strategy. Third World Quarterly, 27(5), 767–783.Google Scholar
  69. Rat der Europäischen Union. (2002). Rahmenbeschluss des Rates vom 13. Juni 2002 zur Terrorismusbekämpfung (Dokument 2002/475/JI). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002F0475&from=EN. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  70. Rucht, D. (2013). Global justice movements and the mass media: Conceptual reflections and empirical findings. In T. Olesen (Hrsg.), Power and Transnational Activism (S. 190–213). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Rucht, D., & Teune, S. (2008). Eine Quantitative Analyse der G8-Berichterstattung in den Printmedien. In D. Rucht & S. Teune (Hrsg.), Nur Clowns und Chaoten? Die G8-Proteste in Heiligendamm im Spiegel der Massenmedien (S. 53–76). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  72. Rupert, M. (1995). Producing hegemony: The politics of mass production and American global power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Sanbonmatsu, J. (2004). The postmodern prince: Critical theory, Left strategy, and the making of a new political subject. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
  74. Scholl, C. (2012). Two sides of a barricade: (Dis)order and summit protests in Europe. New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
  75. Sen, J., Anand, A., Escobar, A., & Waterman, P. (2004). World social forum: Challenging empires. Neu Delhi: Viveka Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Sklair, L. (1997). Social movements for global capitalism: The transnational capitalist class in action. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 514–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skrimshire, S. (2005). Anti-G8 resistance and the state of exception. In D. Harvie, K. Milburn, B. Trott, & D. Watts (Hrsg.), Shut them down! The G8, gleneagles, and the movement of movements (S. 285–290). Leeds: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, J. (2004). The World Social Forum and the challenges of global democracy. Global Networks, 4(4), 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, J. (2008). Social movements for global democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Starhawk. (2001). Staying on the streets. In Anonymous (Hrsg.), On fire: The battle of Genoa and the anti-capitalist movement (S. 125–134). London: One Off Press.Google Scholar
  81. Starr, A. (2001). Naming the enemy: Anti-corporate social movements confront globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  82. Starr, A. (2005). Global revolt: A guide to the movements against globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  83. Starr, A., Fernandez, L., & Scholl, C. (2011). Shutting down the streets: Political violence and social control in the global era. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stephen, M. (2009). Alter-globalism as counter-hegemony: Evaluating the ‚postmodern prince‘. Globalizations, 6(4), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stephen, M. (2011). Globalisation and resistance: Struggles over common sense in the global political economy. Review of International Studies, 37(1), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Strange, S. (1988). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Teune, S. (2011). Communicating dissent: diversity of expression in the protest against the G8 summit in Heiligendamm. In H. Kouki & E. Romanos (Hrsg.), Protest beyond borders: Contentious politics in Europe since 1945 (S. 86–102). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  88. Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2012). The interdependency of mass media and social movements. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammel (Hrsg.), The sage handbook of political communication (S. 387–398). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  89. Waever, O. (2000). The EU as a security actor: Reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on postsovereign security orders. In M. Kelstrup & M. C. Williams (Hrsg.), International relations theory and the politics of European integration (S. 250–294). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Wallerstein, I. (2002). Three hegemonies. In P. O’Brien & A. Cleese (Hrsg.), Two hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001 (S. 357–376). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  91. Williamson, H. (2007, 2. Mai). Germany aims to please G8 guests. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3856f9b4-f8c4-11db-a940-000b5df10621.html#axzz3FZ4E16Lk. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2014.
  92. Worth, O., & Buckley, K. (2009). The world social forum: Postmodern prince or court Jester? Third World Quarterly, 30(4), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wright, C. (2005). Opening spaces: Power, participation and plural democracy at the World Social Forum. Ephemera, 5(2), 409–422.Google Scholar
  94. Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Politikwissenschaft, ResidenzschlossTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtDeutschland
  2. 2.ICISMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNiederlande

Personalised recommendations