# Quantifying the CO_{2} Permit Price Sensitivity

- 146 Downloads
- 2 Citations

## Abstract

Equilibrium models have been widely used in the literature with the aim of showing theoretical properties of emissions trading schemes. This paper applies equilibrium models to empirically study permit prices and to quantify the permit price sensitivity. In particular, we demonstrate that emission trading schemes both with and without banking are inherently prone to price jumps.

## Keywords

CO_{2}emission allowances Equilibrium model Price sensitivity Banking value

# Quantifizierung der CO_{2}-Zertifikate-Preis Sensitivität

## Zusammenfassung

Zur Untersuchung der theoretischen Eigenschaften von Emissionshandelssystemen wurden in der Literatur meist Gleichgewichtsmodelle genutzt. In diesem Artikel nutzen wir Gleichgewichtsmodelle zur empirischen Untersuchung von Zertifikatepreisen und ihren Sensitivitäten. Wir zeigen insbesondere, daß Emissionshandelssysteme (auch wenn Banking zugelassen ist) Preisprozesse generieren, die Sprünge enthalten.

## References

- Carmona R, Fehr M, Hinz J, Porchet A (2009) Market design for emission trading schemes. SIAM Rev 9(3):465–469 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Chesney M, Taschini L (2008) The endogenous price dynamics of emission allowances and an application to CO
_{2}option pricing. Preprint Google Scholar - Cronshaw M, Kruse J (1996) Regulated firms in pollution permit markets with banking. J Regul Econ 9(2):179–189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- European Union (2006) EU emissions trading scheme delivers first verified emissions data for installations. Press release IP/06/612. Brussels Google Scholar
- Grüll G (2010) Modelling CO
_{2}permit prices. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsbibliothek Google Scholar - Grüll G, Taschini L (2011) Cap-and-trade properties under different hybrid scheme designs. J Environ Econ Manag 61(1):107–118 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hepburn C (2009) In: Helm D, Hepburn C (eds) Carbon taxes, emissions trading, and hybrid schemes. The economics and politics of climate change. Oxford University Press, London, pp 365–384 Google Scholar
- Hitzemann S, Uhrig-Homburg M (2010) Understanding the price dynamics of emission permits: a model for multiple trading periods. Preprint Google Scholar
- Jacoby HD, Ellerman AD (2004) The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy 32(4):481–491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jeanblanc M, Yor M, Chesney M (2009) Mathematical methods for financial markets. Springer, Berlin zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kling C, Rubin J (1997) Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. J Public Econ Theory 64:101–115 Google Scholar
- Milevsky MA, Posner SE (1998) Asian options, the sum of lognormals, and the reciprocal gamma distribution. J Financ Quant Anal 33(3):409–421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray BC, et al. (2009) Balancing cost and emissions certainty: an allowance reserve for cap-and-trade. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(3):84–103 Google Scholar
- Roberts MJ, Spence M (1976) Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. J Public Econ 3(5):193–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubin J (1996) A model of intertemporal emission trading, banking and borrowing. J Environ Econ Manag 31:269–286 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seifert J, Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M (2008) Dynamic behavior of CO
_{2}spot prices—theory and empirical evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 56(2):180–194 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar