Contemporary Jewry

, Volume 30, Issue 2–3, pp 273–278 | Cite as

Distance is Always Relative

Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

For all of American Jewry’s obsession with demography, the field remains murky and imprecise. There is disagreement over how many Jews there are and, whatever the number, what they believe and how they act. The distancing debate reflects this situation. Inevitably, intermarriage takes a toll in commitment to Israel, as well as in all other areas that constitute Jewish identity. At the end of the day, the issue of how American Jews relate to Israel is entwined in the powerful impact of advanced assimilation.

Keywords

Israel Distancing Assimilation Demography Jewish 

References

  1. Key, V.O., Jr. 1961. Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  2. Saxe, Leonard, and Barry Chazan. 2008. Ten days of Birthright Israel. Waltham, MA and Hanover: Brandeis Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Schick, Marvin. 1970. Learned Hand’s Court. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Schick, Marvin. 2000. A census of Jewish Day Schools in the United States. New York: Avi Chai.Google Scholar
  5. Schick, Marvin. 2005. A census of Jewish Day Schools in the United States: 2003–2004. New York: Avi Chai.Google Scholar
  6. Schick, Marvin. 2009. A census of Jewish Day Schools in the United States: 2008–2009. New York: Avi Chai.Google Scholar
  7. Tighe, Elizabeth, David Livert, Melissa Barnett, Leonard Saxe. in press. Cross-Survey analysis to estimate low incidence religious groups. Sociological Methods and Research. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. New York USA

Personalised recommendations