An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction
The rapid development of assisted reproduction technologies for the treatment of infertility appears to empower women through expanding their individual choice, but it is also creating new forms of suffering for them and their collaborators, especially in the context of transnational third-party reproduction. This paper explores the possibility of framing the ethical discourse around third-party reproduction by bringing attention to concerns of altruistic empathy for women who collaborate in the reproductive process, in addition to those of individualistic choice. This would entail moving beyond an ethic of liberty that is based on self-interest and the language of rights, to an alternative ethic of care that is based on self-restraint and the language of responsibilities. An ethic of care and responsibility would cultivate the empathetic self-reflection of the autonomous actor in relation to those others who are part of the enterprise of bringing a child into the world.
KeywordsAssisted reproduction technologies (ART) Third-party reproduction Ethic of care Responsibility
- Abrams, F. 2006. The misery behind the baby trade. Daily Mail, 17 July 2006. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-396220/The-misery-baby-trade.html.
- ASRM (American Society for Reproductive Medicine). 2008. Ovarian tissue and oocyte preservation. Fertility and Sterility 90: S241–S246.Google Scholar
- Baran, A., and R. Pannor. 1993. Lethal secrecies: the psychology of donor insemination, problem and solution. Cambridge: Amistead Press.Google Scholar
- Birman, Zviya, Eliezer, Witztum. 2010. To bear a child. Tel Aviv: Aryeh Nir Publishers (Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Buchanan, A., et al. 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Carse, Alisa L. 1991. The voice of care: Implications for bioethical education. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: 5–28.Google Scholar
- CEDAW. 1979. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. United Nations.Google Scholar
- Franklin, Sarah, and Celia Roberts. 2006. Born and made. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gilai-Ginor, Hannah. 2010. The desire for a baby: On the emotional price of infertility treatment. Accessed 25 Sept 2010. http://www.horuta.co.il/article03.html (Hebrew).
- Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hart, H.L.A. 1963. Law, liberty and morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ikemoto, Lisa C. 2009. Reproductive tourism: Equality concerns in the global market for fertility services. Law and Inequality 27: 277–309.Google Scholar
- Israel IVF Regulations. 2010. Public health (Extra-Corporeal Fertilization) regulations (Amendment). Kovetz Takanot 6931: 51.Google Scholar
- Jaggar, Alison M. 1999. Feminist ethics. In The blackwell guide to ethical theory, ed. Hugh LaFollette. Blackwell Publishing. http://www.scribd.com/doc/7455115/Alison-Jaggar-Feminist-Ethics.
- Joint SOGC-CFAS Guideline. 2006. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 28(3): 220–233.Google Scholar
- Katz Rothman, Barbara. 2000. Recreating motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, Margaret. 2001. The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis? Sociology 35(3): 715–728.Google Scholar
- Motluk, Alison. 2010. The human egg trade. The walrus. Accessed 24 Sept 2010. http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2010.04-health-the-human-egg-trade/.
- Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Rapp, Rayna. 2000. Testing women, testing the fetus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Remennick, Larissa. 2006. The quest for the perfect baby: Why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing. Sociology of Health & Illness 28(1): 21–53.Google Scholar
- Robertson, John. 1996. Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Lois. 2010. IVF doctors to raffle human eggs. The Sunday Times. Accessed 24 Sept 2010. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article7061155.ece.
- Sacks, Jonathan. 2002. The dignity of difference. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Sandel, Michael J. 2007. The case against perfection. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Shalev, Carmel, Gabriele, Werner-Felmayer. 2012. Patterns of globalized reproduction: Egg cells regulation in Israel and Austria. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Storrow, Richard F. 2006. Quests for conception: Fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory. Hastings Law Journal 57: 295–330.Google Scholar
- Tronto, Joan C. 2010. Feminist ethics, care and the politics of immigration. In Ethics—gender—medicine: Questions about health in political reflection, vol. 6, ed. Waltraud Ernst, 165–185. Germany: International Women’s and Gender Studies in Lower Saxony.Google Scholar